Evaluating and Determining the Effects of Psychotropic Drugs on Motor Vehicle Driving Performance: Key Considerations of the Japanese Guideline and Criteria for Clinical Implementation of Evidence.

IF 1.9 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Tetsuo Nakabayashi, Kunihiro Iwamoto, Akiko Yamaguchi, Yuki Konishi, Momoe Saji, Reiji Yoshimura, Kousuke Kanemoto, Hirofumi Aoki, Masahiko Ando, Norio Ozaki
{"title":"Evaluating and Determining the Effects of Psychotropic Drugs on Motor Vehicle Driving Performance: Key Considerations of the Japanese Guideline and Criteria for Clinical Implementation of Evidence.","authors":"Tetsuo Nakabayashi, Kunihiro Iwamoto, Akiko Yamaguchi, Yuki Konishi, Momoe Saji, Reiji Yoshimura, Kousuke Kanemoto, Hirofumi Aoki, Masahiko Ando, Norio Ozaki","doi":"10.1002/npr2.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cross-national differences in automobile driving precautions stated in psychotropic drug package inserts primarily reflect regulatory policies and insufficient evaluation method standardization until recent years, rather than intrinsic ethnic differences. In January 2025, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) of Japan issued the Criteria for Determining the Effects of Psychotropic Drugs on Motor Vehicle Driving Performance. These criteria were published as an appendix to an earlier guideline for evaluating these effects published in December 2022. These guidelines and criteria, developed by the authors, provide methods for evaluating the effects of psychotropic drugs. However, these are not intended to assess the fitness of an individual patient to drive. The MHLW guideline and criteria recommend a tiered approach for assessing clinically meaningful driving impairment. Adverse events affecting alertness, such as drowsiness, caused by psychotropic drugs on driving performance are more frequent during the initial treatment stages and dose escalation. Therefore, evaluating the effects of psychotropic drugs on driving performance requires careful consideration of the persistence of clinically meaningful impairment. Additionally, understanding the magnitude and duration of such effects is crucial for selecting appropriate treatments and offering effective guidance to patients. The MHLW criteria categorize the effects of psychotropic drugs on driving performance into four levels based on their magnitude and duration. Furthermore, the MHLW criteria could help to determine which clinical trials are necessary to evaluate the persistence of clinically meaningful impairment. Namely, the MHLW criteria could be used to structure the substantial evidence needed for evaluating the effects on driving performance for approval applications and clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19137,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","volume":"46 1","pages":"e70092"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12893847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.70092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cross-national differences in automobile driving precautions stated in psychotropic drug package inserts primarily reflect regulatory policies and insufficient evaluation method standardization until recent years, rather than intrinsic ethnic differences. In January 2025, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) of Japan issued the Criteria for Determining the Effects of Psychotropic Drugs on Motor Vehicle Driving Performance. These criteria were published as an appendix to an earlier guideline for evaluating these effects published in December 2022. These guidelines and criteria, developed by the authors, provide methods for evaluating the effects of psychotropic drugs. However, these are not intended to assess the fitness of an individual patient to drive. The MHLW guideline and criteria recommend a tiered approach for assessing clinically meaningful driving impairment. Adverse events affecting alertness, such as drowsiness, caused by psychotropic drugs on driving performance are more frequent during the initial treatment stages and dose escalation. Therefore, evaluating the effects of psychotropic drugs on driving performance requires careful consideration of the persistence of clinically meaningful impairment. Additionally, understanding the magnitude and duration of such effects is crucial for selecting appropriate treatments and offering effective guidance to patients. The MHLW criteria categorize the effects of psychotropic drugs on driving performance into four levels based on their magnitude and duration. Furthermore, the MHLW criteria could help to determine which clinical trials are necessary to evaluate the persistence of clinically meaningful impairment. Namely, the MHLW criteria could be used to structure the substantial evidence needed for evaluating the effects on driving performance for approval applications and clinical implementation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估和确定精神药物对机动车驾驶性能的影响:日本指南和临床实施证据标准的关键考虑。
精神药品说明书中汽车驾驶注意事项的跨国差异主要反映的是近年来的监管政策和评价方法标准化程度不高,而非内在的民族差异。2025年1月,日本厚生劳动省(MHLW)发布了《确定精神药物对机动车驾驶性能影响的标准》。这些标准作为评估这些影响的早期指南的附录发布,该指南于2022年12月发布。这些指南和标准,由作者制定,为评估精神药物的作用提供了方法。然而,这些并不是为了评估个体患者的驾驶能力。MHLW指南和标准推荐了一种分级方法来评估临床有意义的驾驶损伤。影响警觉性的不良事件,如嗜睡,由精神药物引起的驾驶性能在初始治疗阶段和剂量增加期间更为频繁。因此,评估精神药物对驾驶性能的影响需要仔细考虑临床意义损害的持续性。此外,了解这些影响的程度和持续时间对于选择适当的治疗方法和为患者提供有效的指导至关重要。MHLW标准根据影响程度和持续时间将精神药物对驾驶表现的影响分为四个级别。此外,MHLW标准可以帮助确定哪些临床试验是必要的,以评估临床有意义的损害的持久性。也就是说,MHLW标准可用于构建评估批准申请和临床实施对驱动性能影响所需的实质性证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书