Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose Reduction for Patients With Brain Metastases From Non-Small Cell Lung Primary on Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003961
Jared H Chung, Salem M Tos, Georgios Mantziaris, Yuki Shinya, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Jack Guiry, Abhinav Kareddy, Tanvika Vegiraju, Edward Llinas, David Penberthy, Zhiyuan Xu, Ryan Gentzler, Camilo Fadul, Jason P Sheehan
{"title":"Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose Reduction for Patients With Brain Metastases From Non-Small Cell Lung Primary on Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy.","authors":"Jared H Chung, Salem M Tos, Georgios Mantziaris, Yuki Shinya, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Jack Guiry, Abhinav Kareddy, Tanvika Vegiraju, Edward Llinas, David Penberthy, Zhiyuan Xu, Ryan Gentzler, Camilo Fadul, Jason P Sheehan","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Lung cancer is the most common primary neoplasm that metastasizes to the brain. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline-suggested doses improves local control, it may increase adverse radiation events (AREs). This study evaluates whether reduced SRS doses can achieve comparable local control while minimizing toxicity in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) primary receiving concurrent systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of 264 patients with 1390 metastases from lung primary treated with SRS between December 2015 and January 2025. Of these, 82 patients with 433 metastases had NSCLC and received concurrent systemic therapy, defined as immunotherapy or targeted therapy within 30 days of SRS. Propensity score matching identified 38 patients with 93 metastases in the higher-dose (HD) group (20-24 Gy for <2 cm, 18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) and 42 patients with 93 metastases in the reduced-dose (RD) group (<20 Gy for <2 cm, <18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiographic AREs, including perilesional edema and radiation necrosis, were significantly more common in the HD group than in the RD group (23.7% vs 10.8%, P = .020). Local control was noninferior in the RD group (94.6%) compared with the HD group (90.3%, P = .400). Cumulative progression at 1, 3, and 5 years remained comparable between the RD (13%, 15%, and 15%, respectively) and HD (7.2%, 10%, and 10%, respectively) groups ( P = .500).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the contemporary era, RD SRS delivered concurrently with immunotherapy or targeted therapy may lower AREs without compromising local control to treat NSCLC brain metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1115-1126"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003961","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Lung cancer is the most common primary neoplasm that metastasizes to the brain. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline-suggested doses improves local control, it may increase adverse radiation events (AREs). This study evaluates whether reduced SRS doses can achieve comparable local control while minimizing toxicity in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) primary receiving concurrent systemic therapy.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 264 patients with 1390 metastases from lung primary treated with SRS between December 2015 and January 2025. Of these, 82 patients with 433 metastases had NSCLC and received concurrent systemic therapy, defined as immunotherapy or targeted therapy within 30 days of SRS. Propensity score matching identified 38 patients with 93 metastases in the higher-dose (HD) group (20-24 Gy for <2 cm, 18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) and 42 patients with 93 metastases in the reduced-dose (RD) group (<20 Gy for <2 cm, <18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm).

Results: Radiographic AREs, including perilesional edema and radiation necrosis, were significantly more common in the HD group than in the RD group (23.7% vs 10.8%, P = .020). Local control was noninferior in the RD group (94.6%) compared with the HD group (90.3%, P = .400). Cumulative progression at 1, 3, and 5 years remained comparable between the RD (13%, 15%, and 15%, respectively) and HD (7.2%, 10%, and 10%, respectively) groups ( P = .500).

Conclusion: In the contemporary era, RD SRS delivered concurrently with immunotherapy or targeted therapy may lower AREs without compromising local control to treat NSCLC brain metastases.

原发性非小细胞肺脑转移患者在免疫治疗或靶向治疗下的立体定向放射手术剂量降低。
背景和目的:肺癌是最常见的转移到脑部的原发肿瘤。虽然立体定向放射外科(SRS)使用美国放射肿瘤学学会指南建议的剂量可以改善局部控制,但它可能增加不良辐射事件(AREs)。本研究评估减少SRS剂量是否可以在减少非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)脑转移患者同时接受全身治疗的同时达到相当的局部控制。方法:我们对2015年12月至2025年1月期间接受SRS治疗的264例1390例肺原发转移患者进行了回顾性研究。其中,82例433例转移性NSCLC患者同时接受了全身治疗,定义为免疫治疗或靶向治疗,在SRS后30天内。倾向评分匹配在高剂量(HD)组(20-24 Gy)中鉴定出38例93例转移灶患者。结果:放射学上的AREs,包括病灶周围水肿和放射性坏死,在HD组中明显比在RD组中更常见(23.7% vs 10.8%, P = 0.020)。与HD组(90.3%,P = 0.400)相比,RD组(94.6%)的局部控制性并不差。RD组(分别为13%、15%和15%)和HD组(分别为7.2%、10%和10%)1、3和5年的累积进展具有可比性(P = .500)。结论:在当代,RD SRS与免疫治疗或靶向治疗同时进行,可以在不影响局部控制的情况下降低AREs,以治疗NSCLC脑转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书