"Me in a nutshell": Exploring the content and properties of central traits.

IF 6.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1037/pspp0000596
Elizabeth U Long, Norhan Elsaadawy, Erika N Carlson, Marc A Fournier
{"title":"\"Me in a nutshell\": Exploring the content and properties of central traits.","authors":"Elizabeth U Long, Norhan Elsaadawy, Erika N Carlson, Marc A Fournier","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trait taxonomies such as the Big Five have been effective in studying population-level trends but may obscure important individual differences in the structure, stability, and personal relevance of individuals' dispositional tendencies. Inspired by Gordon Allport's notion that people may be defined by distinctive \"organizing foci\" of personality, the current work introduces the <i>central trait approach,</i> which focuses on identifying the most defining aspects of an individual and understanding their unique manifestation in a person's life. To develop this framework, we examine open-ended descriptions of participants' central personality traits across four data sets (<i>n</i> = 1,488). We assess coverage of trait content by traditional trait taxonomies and then explore what makes a trait self-defining by predicting trait content from informational (e.g., extremity and stability of trait standing) and motivational (e.g., desirability of the trait) factors and qualitatively analyze extended descriptions of these traits for various identity themes. We find that most (but not all) traits fit the Big Five and that those that did mostly reflected participants' most extreme (but desirable) attributes. This work furthers our understanding of how aspects of personality become personally relevant and lays groundwork for future idiographic study of traits. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"763-785"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000596","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trait taxonomies such as the Big Five have been effective in studying population-level trends but may obscure important individual differences in the structure, stability, and personal relevance of individuals' dispositional tendencies. Inspired by Gordon Allport's notion that people may be defined by distinctive "organizing foci" of personality, the current work introduces the central trait approach, which focuses on identifying the most defining aspects of an individual and understanding their unique manifestation in a person's life. To develop this framework, we examine open-ended descriptions of participants' central personality traits across four data sets (n = 1,488). We assess coverage of trait content by traditional trait taxonomies and then explore what makes a trait self-defining by predicting trait content from informational (e.g., extremity and stability of trait standing) and motivational (e.g., desirability of the trait) factors and qualitatively analyze extended descriptions of these traits for various identity themes. We find that most (but not all) traits fit the Big Five and that those that did mostly reflected participants' most extreme (but desirable) attributes. This work furthers our understanding of how aspects of personality become personally relevant and lays groundwork for future idiographic study of traits. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

“简而言之我”:探索中心特征的内容和属性。
像“大五种”这样的特征分类法在研究群体水平的趋势方面是有效的,但可能会模糊个体在结构、稳定性和个体倾向的个人相关性方面的重要个体差异。戈登·奥尔波特(Gordon Allport)的观点认为,人可能是由个性的独特“组织焦点”来定义的,受到这一观点的启发,目前的工作引入了中心特征方法,该方法侧重于识别个人最具决定性的方面,并理解它们在一个人的生活中的独特表现。为了开发这个框架,我们研究了四个数据集(n = 1488)中参与者核心人格特征的开放式描述。我们通过传统的特质分类评估特质内容的覆盖范围,然后通过从信息性(如特质站立的极端性和稳定性)和动机性(如特质的可取性)因素预测特质内容来探索是什么使特质自我定义,并定性分析这些特质在不同身份主题下的扩展描述。我们发现大多数(但不是全部)特征符合五大特征,而那些符合的特征大多反映了参与者最极端(但最可取)的特征。这项工作进一步加深了我们对人格各方面如何与个人相关的理解,并为未来特质的具体研究奠定了基础。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书