Family socioeconomic status and job search: Pathways to job quality improvement for young adults without college degrees.

IF 6.7 1区 心理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of Applied Psychology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1037/apl0001362
Le Zhou, Borbala Csillag, Connie R Wanberg, Xuan Liu, Abdifatah A Ali
{"title":"Family socioeconomic status and job search: Pathways to job quality improvement for young adults without college degrees.","authors":"Le Zhou, Borbala Csillag, Connie R Wanberg, Xuan Liu, Abdifatah A Ali","doi":"10.1037/apl0001362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improving job quality through job transitions is crucial in early adulthood. However, young adults without college degrees, particularly those from lower socioeconomic status (SES) families, can struggle to break out of lower quality jobs. Integrating socioeconomic and psychological perspectives, this research examines how family SES impacts job quality improvement through job search among young adults without college degrees when they transition from one job to another. We develop and test a model that explicates how family SES influences job quality improvement through constraints and resources for job search and self-regulated job search processes. Partnering with a Midwest state government agency, we collected data from young job seekers without college degrees through four longitudinal surveys over 6 months. Our findings revealed that job seekers from lower (vs. higher) SES families faced more basic needs constraints and had fewer college degree holders in their job search networks. These factors, in turn, influenced job seekers' wage increase goals and their job search metacognition. We also found that job seekers with higher wage increase goals achieved larger wage improvement between their previous and new jobs, and those who engaged in more job search metacognition were more likely to secure improvements in benefits, find new jobs with promotion opportunities, and perceive improvements in working conditions. These findings extend the literature on job quality, job search, socioeconomic mobility, and inequality and provide practical implications for multiple stakeholder groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1352-1378"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001362","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving job quality through job transitions is crucial in early adulthood. However, young adults without college degrees, particularly those from lower socioeconomic status (SES) families, can struggle to break out of lower quality jobs. Integrating socioeconomic and psychological perspectives, this research examines how family SES impacts job quality improvement through job search among young adults without college degrees when they transition from one job to another. We develop and test a model that explicates how family SES influences job quality improvement through constraints and resources for job search and self-regulated job search processes. Partnering with a Midwest state government agency, we collected data from young job seekers without college degrees through four longitudinal surveys over 6 months. Our findings revealed that job seekers from lower (vs. higher) SES families faced more basic needs constraints and had fewer college degree holders in their job search networks. These factors, in turn, influenced job seekers' wage increase goals and their job search metacognition. We also found that job seekers with higher wage increase goals achieved larger wage improvement between their previous and new jobs, and those who engaged in more job search metacognition were more likely to secure improvements in benefits, find new jobs with promotion opportunities, and perceive improvements in working conditions. These findings extend the literature on job quality, job search, socioeconomic mobility, and inequality and provide practical implications for multiple stakeholder groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

家庭社会经济地位和求职:没有大学学位的年轻人提高工作质量的途径。
在成年早期,通过工作转换来提高工作质量至关重要。然而,没有大学学位的年轻人,特别是那些来自社会经济地位较低(SES)家庭的年轻人,可能很难摆脱低质量的工作。结合社会经济和心理学的观点,本研究考察了家庭经济地位如何影响没有大学学位的年轻人在换工作时通过求职来提高工作质量。我们开发并测试了一个模型,该模型解释了家庭SES如何通过求职约束和资源以及自我调节的求职过程来影响工作质量的提高。我们与一家中西部州政府机构合作,在6个月的时间里,通过4次纵向调查,收集了没有大学学位的年轻求职者的数据。我们的研究结果显示,来自较低(相对于较高)社会经济地位家庭的求职者面临更多的基本需求限制,并且在他们的求职网络中拥有大学学位的人较少。这些因素反过来又影响了求职者的加薪目标和求职元认知。我们还发现,具有更高加薪目标的求职者在前一份工作和新工作之间获得了更大的加薪,而那些从事更多求职元认知的求职者更有可能获得福利的改善,找到有晋升机会的新工作,并感受到工作条件的改善。这些发现扩展了关于工作质量、求职、社会经济流动性和不平等的文献,并为多个利益相关者群体提供了实际意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Psychology® focuses on publishing original investigations that contribute new knowledge and understanding to fields of applied psychology (excluding clinical and applied experimental or human factors, which are better suited for other APA journals). The journal primarily considers empirical and theoretical investigations that enhance understanding of cognitive, motivational, affective, and behavioral psychological phenomena in work and organizational settings. These phenomena can occur at individual, group, organizational, or cultural levels, and in various work settings such as business, education, training, health, service, government, or military institutions. The journal welcomes submissions from both public and private sector organizations, for-profit or nonprofit. It publishes several types of articles, including: 1.Rigorously conducted empirical investigations that expand conceptual understanding (original investigations or meta-analyses). 2.Theory development articles and integrative conceptual reviews that synthesize literature and generate new theories on psychological phenomena to stimulate novel research. 3.Rigorously conducted qualitative research on phenomena that are challenging to capture with quantitative methods or require inductive theory building.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书