Impact of AI Scribes on Physician Productivity and Workflow in Medical Oncology.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI:10.1200/OP-25-00612
Nima Toussi, Caroline Zhang, Jocelyn Kang, Edward J Licitra
{"title":"Impact of AI Scribes on Physician Productivity and Workflow in Medical Oncology.","authors":"Nima Toussi, Caroline Zhang, Jocelyn Kang, Edward J Licitra","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) scribes are being rapidly adopted in oncology, yet their real-world impact on physician productivity, workflow, and workplace satisfaction is understudied. We evaluated the quantitative and qualitative effects of an AI scribe with electronic medical record (EMR) integration in a multisite community oncology practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, multisite study enrolled 22 medical oncologists and three primary care physicians randomly assigned to receiving training and exposure to the Knowtex AI scribe in an initial phase or control phase. Physician billing data were collected for 6 months before the onboarding of intervention arm physicians and for 16 weeks afterward-within the 2024 fiscal year. Surveys administered at baseline and week 8 postexposure assessed documentation burden, quality, EMR experience, and overall documentation satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All enrolled providers adopted the Knowtex AI scribe during their respective study phase. Intervention arm physicians exhibited an increase in mean visits (β = 3.35, SE = 1.08, <i>P</i> = .010) and mean total billing per working day (β = $433.61 in US dollars, SE = $134.82, <i>P</i> = .007). There was no change in the number of diagnostic codes per visit. Physicians' perceptions of EMR challenges markedly decreased after implementing the AI scribe (<i>P</i> < .001) with no significant change in the quality of documentation. Physicians reported higher satisfaction with documentation workflow, reduced in-clinic documentation hours, and increased time with patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adoption of an AI scribe with EMR integration in oncology clinics may enhance certain billing metrics and positively shift physician perceptions of documentation processes and EMR challenges. These findings highlight potential benefits and limitations of AI scribes in improving physician productivity and satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"1797-1804"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) scribes are being rapidly adopted in oncology, yet their real-world impact on physician productivity, workflow, and workplace satisfaction is understudied. We evaluated the quantitative and qualitative effects of an AI scribe with electronic medical record (EMR) integration in a multisite community oncology practice.

Methods: This single-center, multisite study enrolled 22 medical oncologists and three primary care physicians randomly assigned to receiving training and exposure to the Knowtex AI scribe in an initial phase or control phase. Physician billing data were collected for 6 months before the onboarding of intervention arm physicians and for 16 weeks afterward-within the 2024 fiscal year. Surveys administered at baseline and week 8 postexposure assessed documentation burden, quality, EMR experience, and overall documentation satisfaction.

Results: All enrolled providers adopted the Knowtex AI scribe during their respective study phase. Intervention arm physicians exhibited an increase in mean visits (β = 3.35, SE = 1.08, P = .010) and mean total billing per working day (β = $433.61 in US dollars, SE = $134.82, P = .007). There was no change in the number of diagnostic codes per visit. Physicians' perceptions of EMR challenges markedly decreased after implementing the AI scribe (P < .001) with no significant change in the quality of documentation. Physicians reported higher satisfaction with documentation workflow, reduced in-clinic documentation hours, and increased time with patients.

Conclusion: Adoption of an AI scribe with EMR integration in oncology clinics may enhance certain billing metrics and positively shift physician perceptions of documentation processes and EMR challenges. These findings highlight potential benefits and limitations of AI scribes in improving physician productivity and satisfaction.

人工智能抄写器对肿瘤内科医生工作效率和工作流程的影响。
目的:人工智能(AI)抄写员在肿瘤学领域被迅速采用,但它们对医生生产力、工作流程和工作场所满意度的实际影响尚未得到充分研究。我们在一个多站点的社区肿瘤学实践中评估了人工智能抄写器与电子病历(EMR)集成的定量和定性效果。方法:这项单中心、多地点的研究招募了22名肿瘤学家和3名初级保健医生,随机分配在初始阶段或对照阶段接受Knowtex AI scriscribe的培训和接触。在干预组医生入职前6个月和干预组医生入职后16周(2024财政年度内)收集医生账单数据。在基线和暴露后第8周进行的调查评估了文件负担、质量、EMR体验和总体文件满意度。结果:所有入组的提供者在各自的研究阶段均采用Knowtex AI记录仪。干预组医生的平均就诊次数(β = 3.35, SE = 1.08, P = 0.010)和每个工作日的平均总账单(β = 433.61美元,SE = 134.82美元,P = 0.007)均有所增加。每次就诊的诊断代码数量没有变化。实施AI抄写器后,医生对EMR挑战的认知显著降低(P < 0.001),而文件质量没有显著变化。医生报告对文档工作流程的满意度更高,减少了门诊文档工作时间,增加了与患者相处的时间。结论:在肿瘤诊所中采用集成了EMR的人工智能抄写器可以提高某些计费指标,并积极改变医生对文档流程和EMR挑战的看法。这些发现强调了人工智能抄写器在提高医生工作效率和满意度方面的潜在好处和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书