Survival benefit of guideline-directed medical therapy in older patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Pub Date : 2026-09-24 DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326305
Elinor Tan, Chan Meei-Wah, Yao Hao Teo, Li Feng Tan, Vanda Wen Teng Ho, Weiqin Lin, Tiong-Cheng Yeo, Raymond Ching Chiew Wong, Ping Chai, William Kong, Ching-Hui Sia
{"title":"Survival benefit of guideline-directed medical therapy in older patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Elinor Tan, Chan Meei-Wah, Yao Hao Teo, Li Feng Tan, Vanda Wen Teng Ho, Weiqin Lin, Tiong-Cheng Yeo, Raymond Ching Chiew Wong, Ping Chai, William Kong, Ching-Hui Sia","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure-related mortality in older patients has increased. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains insufficient in this population. This study assessed the survival benefit of GDMT in elderly patients aged ≥65 years old with HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 5 February 2025. Inclusion criteria were age ≥65 years old with HFrEF, GDMT vs no GDMT and reported survival data. Pooled prevalence, HR and risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI were analysed. Heterogeneity was further explored through subgroup analyses. We evaluated potential small-study effects using Begg's rank correlation test, Egger's regression test, funnel plot inspection and trim-and-fill analysis. Publication bias was analysed visually using a funnel plot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34 studies with 92 916 patients from 1994 to 2024 were included. The GDMT group received three of the four main drug classes in three studies, two drug classes in four studies and at least one class in the remaining studies. There were no reported data on the survival benefits of older patients receiving four classes of GDMT. Frail older patients were less likely to receive GDMT (RR 0.63 (0.45-0.89), I2 50%, p=0.009). There was a survival benefit of GDMT in older patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (HR 0.69 (0.64-0.74) p<0.001, Tau<sup>2</sup> 0.03, I<sup>2</sup> 71%). Older patients receiving beta-blockers were more likely to develop bradycardia (RR 3.98 (2.72-5.82), p<0.001, I2 0%). There was no difference in hypotension, acute renal impairment and hypoglycaemia between the GDMT and control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of GDMT in older patients with LV systolic dysfunction was associated with a survival benefit. However, the presence of frailty may limit the successful implementation and tolerability of these therapies. High-quality studies are urgently needed to guide the development of novel strategies aimed at optimising the management of older, frail patients with LV systolic function.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":"1114-1124"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure-related mortality in older patients has increased. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains insufficient in this population. This study assessed the survival benefit of GDMT in elderly patients aged ≥65 years old with HFrEF.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 5 February 2025. Inclusion criteria were age ≥65 years old with HFrEF, GDMT vs no GDMT and reported survival data. Pooled prevalence, HR and risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI were analysed. Heterogeneity was further explored through subgroup analyses. We evaluated potential small-study effects using Begg's rank correlation test, Egger's regression test, funnel plot inspection and trim-and-fill analysis. Publication bias was analysed visually using a funnel plot.

Results: 34 studies with 92 916 patients from 1994 to 2024 were included. The GDMT group received three of the four main drug classes in three studies, two drug classes in four studies and at least one class in the remaining studies. There were no reported data on the survival benefits of older patients receiving four classes of GDMT. Frail older patients were less likely to receive GDMT (RR 0.63 (0.45-0.89), I2 50%, p=0.009). There was a survival benefit of GDMT in older patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (HR 0.69 (0.64-0.74) p<0.001, Tau2 0.03, I2 71%). Older patients receiving beta-blockers were more likely to develop bradycardia (RR 3.98 (2.72-5.82), p<0.001, I2 0%). There was no difference in hypotension, acute renal impairment and hypoglycaemia between the GDMT and control group.

Conclusions: The use of GDMT in older patients with LV systolic dysfunction was associated with a survival benefit. However, the presence of frailty may limit the successful implementation and tolerability of these therapies. High-quality studies are urgently needed to guide the development of novel strategies aimed at optimising the management of older, frail patients with LV systolic function.

指南指导的药物治疗对老年心力衰竭患者的生存益处:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:老年患者心力衰竭相关死亡率有所增加。针对心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的指导药物治疗(GDMT)在这一人群中仍然不足。本研究评估了GDMT在≥65岁HFrEF老年患者中的生存获益。方法:检索MEDLINE, EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆自成立至2025年2月5日。纳入标准为年龄≥65岁伴HFrEF、GDMT vs无GDMT和已报告的生存数据。分析合并患病率、HR和风险比(RR) (95% CI)。通过亚组分析进一步探讨异质性。我们使用贝格秩相关检验、艾格回归检验、漏斗图检验和补齐分析来评估潜在的小研究效应。发表偏倚采用漏斗图进行视觉分析。结果:1994 - 2024年共纳入34项研究,92916例患者。GDMT组在三项研究中接受了四种主要药物类别中的三种,在四项研究中接受了两种药物类别,在其余研究中至少接受了一种药物类别。没有关于接受四类GDMT的老年患者生存获益的报告数据。体弱的老年患者接受GDMT的可能性较低(RR 0.63 (0.45-0.89), I2 50%, p=0.009)。GDMT对老年左室(LV)收缩功能障碍患者有生存获益(HR 0.69 (0.64-0.74) p2 0.03, I2 71%)。接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的老年患者更容易发生心动过缓(RR 3.98(2.72-5.82))。结论:在左室收缩功能障碍的老年患者中使用GDMT与生存获益相关。然而,虚弱的存在可能会限制这些疗法的成功实施和耐受性。迫切需要高质量的研究来指导新策略的发展,旨在优化老年虚弱的左室收缩功能患者的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart
Heart 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书