Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis on Echocardiography Using Artificial Intelligence.

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis (CA) on echocardiography can be challenging due to the imaging overlap between CA and more prevalent causes of a hypertrophic phenotype. This study sought to (1) evaluate the performance of artificial-intelligence (AI) derived measurements incorporated into the established multiparametric echocardiographic scoring system to detect CA; (2) develop and validate an AI-based deep-learning model for video-based detection of CA on echocardiography.

Methods: The study population comprised 5776 patients (CA, 2756; controls, 3020). The training data set included patients from the UK National Amyloidosis Center and Taiwan MacKay Memorial Hospital (CA, 2241; controls, 2130). External test data sets were obtained from the US Duke University Health System (CA, 334; left ventricular hypertrophy controls, 668) and Japan National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (CA, 181; left ventricular hypertrophy controls, 222).

Results: The multiparametric echocardiographic score computed using AI-derived measurements achieved an accuracy of 79.5% (sensitivity, 75.4%; specificity, 81.5%) in the United States cohort and 79.7% (sensitivity, 81.6%; specificity, 78.1%) in the Japan cohort. The deep-learning model demonstrated accuracies of 96.2% (sensitivity, 96.8%; specificity, 95.7%) and 95.8% (sensitivity, 97.3%; specificity, 94.3%) in the internal validation and internal test sets, respectively. External validation of the deep-learning model showed accuracies of 87.5% (sensitivity, 86.6%; specificity, 87.9%) in the United States and 88.4% (sensitivity, 92.3%; specificity, 85.3%) in the Japanese cohort. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the deep-learning model showed robust discrimination of CA from other hypertrophic phenocopies: CA versus hypertension (area under the curve [AUC], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.91-0.94]), CA versus hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (AUC, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.94]), CA versus aortic stenosis (AUC, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.90-0.95]), CA versus chronic kidney disease (AUC, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.91-0.95]). The deep-learning model was able to classify a greater proportion of patients compared with the AI-derived multiparametric echocardiographic score and achieved superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.91-0.95] versus AUC, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.85-0.90]; P<0.001).

Conclusions: Both the multiparametric echocardiographic score computed from AI-derived measurements and the fully automated deep-learning model can accurately identify patients with CA in globally diverse cohorts, with the deep-learning model providing superior performance.