Andreas Espehana, George Macfarlane, Elizabeth Mairenn Garden, Liam Lee, Gabija Klyvyte, Lavandan Jegatheeswaran, Rebecca Davies, Carl Philpott
{"title":"Investigating the Effect of Tumour Necrosis Factor Antagonist on Olfaction","authors":"Andreas Espehana, George Macfarlane, Elizabeth Mairenn Garden, Liam Lee, Gabija Klyvyte, Lavandan Jegatheeswaran, Rebecca Davies, Carl Philpott","doi":"10.1111/coa.70093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Tumour Necrosis factor antagonists is a potent anti-inflammatory medication and has shown to improve olfactory function in murine models. The primary aim was to determine the effect of TNF antagonists on olfactory performance in humans. Secondary aim is to generate pilot data on the suitability of TNF for a randomised controlled trial in patients with smell disorders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>This study is a single centre observatory prospective proof of concept cohort study. Adult patients are recruited from a tertiary rheumatology centre, who are to be initiated on TNF antagonists therapy (adalimumab biosimilar) for the first time. Participants were assessed with a simple questionnaire and a baseline olfactory assessment with the extended Sniffin’ Stick Test. Participants were then brought back after 3 months of treatment for a repeat questionnaire and Sniffin’ Sticks Test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>The primary outcome <i>was</i> to determine the difference between smell test scores in the Sniffin’ Sticks TDI score before and after 3-months of treatment. Secondary outcomes include changes in visual analogue score from baseline to follow-up (questionnaire).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-three participants were recruited in the study; 21 were lost to follow up and two had stopped taking their medication, hence 40 were included in the analysis. There was no statistically significant improvement in TDI score of all participants at 3 months after treatment (<i>p</i> value = 0.08). However, analysis of participants who had olfactory dysfunction at baseline (<i>n</i> = 20, TDI < 31 or 30.5 if aged 20–30) showed a statistically significant improvement in TDI score after 3 months (<i>p</i> value = 0.012).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>TNF antagonists have the potential to improve olfactory function in those with olfactory dysfunction and should be subjected to further study in a selected group of patients with olfactory dysfunction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":"51 4","pages":"504-511"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coa.70093","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.70093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Tumour Necrosis factor antagonists is a potent anti-inflammatory medication and has shown to improve olfactory function in murine models. The primary aim was to determine the effect of TNF antagonists on olfactory performance in humans. Secondary aim is to generate pilot data on the suitability of TNF for a randomised controlled trial in patients with smell disorders.
Design
This study is a single centre observatory prospective proof of concept cohort study. Adult patients are recruited from a tertiary rheumatology centre, who are to be initiated on TNF antagonists therapy (adalimumab biosimilar) for the first time. Participants were assessed with a simple questionnaire and a baseline olfactory assessment with the extended Sniffin’ Stick Test. Participants were then brought back after 3 months of treatment for a repeat questionnaire and Sniffin’ Sticks Test.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary outcome was to determine the difference between smell test scores in the Sniffin’ Sticks TDI score before and after 3-months of treatment. Secondary outcomes include changes in visual analogue score from baseline to follow-up (questionnaire).
Results
Sixty-three participants were recruited in the study; 21 were lost to follow up and two had stopped taking their medication, hence 40 were included in the analysis. There was no statistically significant improvement in TDI score of all participants at 3 months after treatment (p value = 0.08). However, analysis of participants who had olfactory dysfunction at baseline (n = 20, TDI < 31 or 30.5 if aged 20–30) showed a statistically significant improvement in TDI score after 3 months (p value = 0.012).
Conclusion
TNF antagonists have the potential to improve olfactory function in those with olfactory dysfunction and should be subjected to further study in a selected group of patients with olfactory dysfunction.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.