Trauma-related eye removal is associated with increased psychiatric morbidity compared to other surgical indications: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Natalia Davila, Chloe Shields, Tejus Pradeep, Samantha Mclaughlin, Brian Wong, Wendy W Lee
{"title":"Trauma-related eye removal is associated with increased psychiatric morbidity compared to other surgical indications: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Natalia Davila, Chloe Shields, Tejus Pradeep, Samantha Mclaughlin, Brian Wong, Wendy W Lee","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2025-328283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>To evaluate psychiatric outcomes following enucleation or evisceration (EE) and determine whether these outcomes differ by the underlying aetiology related to surgery, including trauma, blind painful eye, infection and malignancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilised the TriNetX Research Network, analysing deidentified records of 20 109 patients who underwent EE. Psychiatric outcomes were compared with 325 108 patients who underwent other major ocular surgeries. Patients were propensity-score matched, and EE cases were stratified into trauma, blind painful eye, infection or malignancy cohorts. Outcomes included new diagnoses of depression, anxiety, stress and adjustment disorders, substance use disorders and new prescriptions of antidepressants or anxiolytics within 1 year. Predictors of psychiatric outcomes were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards models at 3 years postindex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to matched controls, the EE cohort had higher rates of antidepressant use (risk ratio, RR 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.25; p<0.01) and anxiolytic use (RR 1.15; CI, 1.07 to 1.25; p<0.01), despite similar diagnostic rates of depression. Among subgroups, trauma-related EE was uniquely associated with elevated risk of depression (RR 1.85; CI, 1.06 to 3.21; p=0.03), antidepressant use (RR 2.18; CI, 1.45 to 3.26; p<0.01), anxiolytic use (RR 1.63; CI, 1.13 to 2.33; p<0.01) and substance use disorders (RR 2.04; CI, 1.10 to 3.79; p=0.02). Trauma remained an independent predictor of depression after adjusting for psychiatric history and covariates (HR 1.34; CI, 1.11 to 1.62; p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychiatric morbidity following eye removal is influenced by related surgical aetiology. Trauma-related EE carries a distinctly higher psychiatric burden, supporting the need for targeted mental health screening and intervention in this vulnerable subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1083-1089"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2025-328283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: To evaluate psychiatric outcomes following enucleation or evisceration (EE) and determine whether these outcomes differ by the underlying aetiology related to surgery, including trauma, blind painful eye, infection and malignancy.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilised the TriNetX Research Network, analysing deidentified records of 20 109 patients who underwent EE. Psychiatric outcomes were compared with 325 108 patients who underwent other major ocular surgeries. Patients were propensity-score matched, and EE cases were stratified into trauma, blind painful eye, infection or malignancy cohorts. Outcomes included new diagnoses of depression, anxiety, stress and adjustment disorders, substance use disorders and new prescriptions of antidepressants or anxiolytics within 1 year. Predictors of psychiatric outcomes were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards models at 3 years postindex.

Results: Compared to matched controls, the EE cohort had higher rates of antidepressant use (risk ratio, RR 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.25; p<0.01) and anxiolytic use (RR 1.15; CI, 1.07 to 1.25; p<0.01), despite similar diagnostic rates of depression. Among subgroups, trauma-related EE was uniquely associated with elevated risk of depression (RR 1.85; CI, 1.06 to 3.21; p=0.03), antidepressant use (RR 2.18; CI, 1.45 to 3.26; p<0.01), anxiolytic use (RR 1.63; CI, 1.13 to 2.33; p<0.01) and substance use disorders (RR 2.04; CI, 1.10 to 3.79; p=0.02). Trauma remained an independent predictor of depression after adjusting for psychiatric history and covariates (HR 1.34; CI, 1.11 to 1.62; p<0.01).

Conclusion: Psychiatric morbidity following eye removal is influenced by related surgical aetiology. Trauma-related EE carries a distinctly higher psychiatric burden, supporting the need for targeted mental health screening and intervention in this vulnerable subgroup.

与其他手术指征相比,创伤性眼部摘除与精神疾病发病率增加相关:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景/目的:评估去核或内脏切除(EE)后的精神结局,并确定这些结局是否因手术相关的潜在病因而不同,包括创伤、失明痛眼、感染和恶性肿瘤。方法:这项回顾性队列研究利用TriNetX研究网络,分析了20109例EE患者的未确定记录。精神病学结果与325108名接受其他眼部大手术的患者进行了比较。患者倾向评分匹配,EE病例分为创伤组、盲痛眼组、感染组和恶性组。结果包括1年内新诊断的抑郁、焦虑、压力和适应障碍、物质使用障碍和新处方的抗抑郁药或抗焦虑药。在指数后3年使用Cox比例风险模型评估精神预后的预测因子。结果:与匹配的对照组相比,EE队列的抗抑郁药物使用率更高(风险比,RR 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04至1.25)。结论:摘除眼后精神疾病发病率受相关手术病因的影响。创伤相关情感表达具有明显更高的精神负担,支持有针对性的心理健康筛查和干预这一弱势亚群体的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书