Do Engine-Specific Tax Programs Work? A Structural Analysis of Market Spillovers and Welfare Implications

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Jiasheng Li, Pei Li, Yi Lu
{"title":"Do Engine-Specific Tax Programs Work? A Structural Analysis of Market Spillovers and Welfare Implications","authors":"Jiasheng Li,&nbsp;Pei Li,&nbsp;Yi Lu","doi":"10.1111/iere.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper examines engine-specific tax programs that are widely used in developing countries to limit car emissions. Using China's tax abatement program for small vehicles in 2015, we find significant price and sales responses for both small and large vehicles, indicating strong competition spillovers. The quantification model shows that an increase in car ownership generates more car emissions than the reduction resulting from the relocation from large to small vehicles. Welfare analysis further shows that the reduced government tax revenue and increased car emissions significantly outweigh the increased household welfare and firm profits, rendering the engine-specific tax program socially unbeneficial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48302,"journal":{"name":"International Economic Review","volume":"67 1","pages":"287-312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iere.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines engine-specific tax programs that are widely used in developing countries to limit car emissions. Using China's tax abatement program for small vehicles in 2015, we find significant price and sales responses for both small and large vehicles, indicating strong competition spillovers. The quantification model shows that an increase in car ownership generates more car emissions than the reduction resulting from the relocation from large to small vehicles. Welfare analysis further shows that the reduced government tax revenue and increased car emissions significantly outweigh the increased household welfare and firm profits, rendering the engine-specific tax program socially unbeneficial.

特定引擎的税收程序有效吗?市场溢出效应及其福利影响的结构性分析
本文考察了发展中国家广泛用于限制汽车排放的针对发动机的税收计划。利用中国2015年的小型汽车减税计划,我们发现小型和大型汽车的价格和销售都有显著的反应,表明竞争溢出效应很强。量化模型表明,汽车保有量的增加所产生的汽车排放大于由大车转向小型车所减少的排放量。福利分析进一步表明,政府税收收入的减少和汽车排放的增加大大超过了家庭福利和企业利润的增加,使得针对发动机的税收计划在社会上是不利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Economic Review was established in 1960 to provide a forum for modern quantitative economics. From its inception, the journal has tried to stimulate economic research around the world by publishing cutting edge papers in many areas of economics, including econometrics, economic theory, macro, and applied economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书