Complementary or Conflicting? Exploring the Interactions Between Technological, Marketing, and Operational Capabilities in Radical Technological Innovation

IF 12 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Sebastian Kruse, Frederik Maibaum, Janosch Bär, Malte Brettel
{"title":"Complementary or Conflicting? Exploring the Interactions Between Technological, Marketing, and Operational Capabilities in Radical Technological Innovation","authors":"Sebastian Kruse,&nbsp;Frederik Maibaum,&nbsp;Janosch Bär,&nbsp;Malte Brettel","doi":"10.1111/jpim.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Academic Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This article examines how interactions among technological, marketing, and operational capabilities influence radical technological innovation (RTI). While existing research underscores the individual influence of these capabilities, there are theoretical tensions regarding how their interactions shape RTI. We theorize that strong marketing capabilities can diminish the positive impact of technological capabilities on RTI, as they may divert technological efforts away from RTI-focused initiatives. Conversely, we propose that operational capabilities amplify the effect of technological capabilities on RTI by enabling more flexible operations and fostering inter-functional collaboration. Additionally, we argue that operational capabilities alleviate the negative influence of marketing capabilities by integrating marketing more closely with other functions. To test these propositions, we analyze a unique dataset spanning 1522 firm-year observations from 126 US manufacturing firms (2004–2016), utilizing a sophisticated patent-based measure to operationalize RTI. Our results indicate that strong marketing capabilities effectively neutralize the positive effect of technological capabilities on RTI. Moreover, strong operational capabilities reduce the negative effect of marketing capabilities by roughly half. We contribute toward resolving theoretical debates on the complementarity versus conflict between technological, marketing, and operational capabilities in shaping RTI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This study explores how the interactions between three key organizational capabilities—marketing, technological, and operational—impact RTI. Our findings reveal that strong marketing capabilities often conflict with technological capabilities, neutralizing their positive effect on RTI. To address this, we recommend that firms take proactive steps to enhance complementarity between marketing and technology functions. Specifically, firms can assign technical teams to lead RTI projects, align marketing incentives with RTI objectives, and empower marketing teams to identify customer challenges that current technologies cannot solve. Additionally, we find that operational capabilities can mitigate the negative influence of marketing on RTI by better integrating marketing with other functions. Our results show that strong operational capabilities can reduce this negative impact by approximately 50%. Therefore, we advise firms to strengthen their operational capabilities to counteract the adverse effects of marketing and to better integrate their marketing functions with operational processes to promote RTI.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":"43 2","pages":"341-358"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpim.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.70002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic Summary

This article examines how interactions among technological, marketing, and operational capabilities influence radical technological innovation (RTI). While existing research underscores the individual influence of these capabilities, there are theoretical tensions regarding how their interactions shape RTI. We theorize that strong marketing capabilities can diminish the positive impact of technological capabilities on RTI, as they may divert technological efforts away from RTI-focused initiatives. Conversely, we propose that operational capabilities amplify the effect of technological capabilities on RTI by enabling more flexible operations and fostering inter-functional collaboration. Additionally, we argue that operational capabilities alleviate the negative influence of marketing capabilities by integrating marketing more closely with other functions. To test these propositions, we analyze a unique dataset spanning 1522 firm-year observations from 126 US manufacturing firms (2004–2016), utilizing a sophisticated patent-based measure to operationalize RTI. Our results indicate that strong marketing capabilities effectively neutralize the positive effect of technological capabilities on RTI. Moreover, strong operational capabilities reduce the negative effect of marketing capabilities by roughly half. We contribute toward resolving theoretical debates on the complementarity versus conflict between technological, marketing, and operational capabilities in shaping RTI.

Managerial Summary

This study explores how the interactions between three key organizational capabilities—marketing, technological, and operational—impact RTI. Our findings reveal that strong marketing capabilities often conflict with technological capabilities, neutralizing their positive effect on RTI. To address this, we recommend that firms take proactive steps to enhance complementarity between marketing and technology functions. Specifically, firms can assign technical teams to lead RTI projects, align marketing incentives with RTI objectives, and empower marketing teams to identify customer challenges that current technologies cannot solve. Additionally, we find that operational capabilities can mitigate the negative influence of marketing on RTI by better integrating marketing with other functions. Our results show that strong operational capabilities can reduce this negative impact by approximately 50%. Therefore, we advise firms to strengthen their operational capabilities to counteract the adverse effects of marketing and to better integrate their marketing functions with operational processes to promote RTI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

互补还是冲突?探索突破性技术创新中技术、营销和运营能力之间的相互作用
本文考察了技术、营销和运营能力之间的相互作用如何影响突破性技术创新(RTI)。虽然现有的研究强调了这些能力的个人影响,但关于它们的相互作用如何塑造RTI,理论上存在紧张关系。我们的理论是,强大的营销能力可以减少技术能力对RTI的积极影响,因为它们可能会转移技术努力,远离RTI为重点的举措。相反,我们建议操作能力通过实现更灵活的操作和促进职能间协作来放大技术能力对RTI的影响。此外,我们认为运营能力通过将营销与其他职能更紧密地整合来减轻营销能力的负面影响。为了验证这些命题,我们分析了一个独特的数据集,该数据集涵盖了来自126家美国制造公司(2004-2016)的1522个公司年度观察结果,利用一种复杂的基于专利的措施来实施RTI。研究结果表明,强大的营销能力有效地抵消了技术能力对RTI的积极影响。此外,强大的运营能力将营销能力的负面影响减少了大约一半。我们致力于解决关于形成RTI的技术、营销和运营能力之间的互补性与冲突的理论争论。本研究探讨了三种关键组织能力——营销、技术和运营能力之间的相互作用如何影响RTI。我们的研究结果表明,强大的营销能力往往与技术能力相冲突,抵消了它们对RTI的积极影响。为了解决这个问题,我们建议企业采取积极的措施,加强营销和技术职能之间的互补性。具体来说,公司可以指派技术团队来领导RTI项目,将营销激励与RTI目标结合起来,并授权营销团队识别当前技术无法解决的客户挑战。此外,我们发现运营能力可以通过更好地整合营销与其他职能来缓解营销对RTI的负面影响。我们的研究结果表明,强大的运营能力可以将这种负面影响减少约50%。因此,我们建议企业加强其运营能力,以抵消营销的不利影响,并更好地将其营销职能与运营流程相结合,以促进RTI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Journal of Product Innovation Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书