“The Hamster Wheel Is on Fire”: How the Pandemic Amplified Inequality in the Academy

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Catherine Albiston, Tonya L. Brito, Cathy Hu, Daniela Campos Ugaz
{"title":"“The Hamster Wheel Is on Fire”: How the Pandemic Amplified Inequality in the Academy","authors":"Catherine Albiston,&nbsp;Tonya L. Brito,&nbsp;Cathy Hu,&nbsp;Daniela Campos Ugaz","doi":"10.1111/gwao.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Institutional practices often recreate inequalities within organizations, especially in times of crisis like the COVID pandemic. Although early pandemic research expressed alarm that increased caregiving demands were reducing women's research productivity, it paid less attention to changing work demands. By contrast, this article examines whether pandemic changes in academic work demands varied across race and gender, drawing on survey data from 1198 faculty members in two university systems in the United States. Consistent with theories of institutional routines, identity taxation, and status beliefs, we find that, compared to their colleagues, women and faculty of color spent more time on service and teaching, performed more emotional labor, and experienced more burnout. Women report greater decreases than men in research productivity, but the presence of children does not fully explain these gender differences. Women are more likely to consider leaving the university, but intentions to leave are driven by their disproportionate emotional labor and service during the pandemic. Our findings provide insight into how pandemic increases in academic labor fell more heavily on some faculty members than others. They also contribute to our understanding of mechanisms that reproduce inequality in the academy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48128,"journal":{"name":"Gender Work and Organization","volume":"33 2","pages":"624-643"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwao.70066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Work and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.70066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Institutional practices often recreate inequalities within organizations, especially in times of crisis like the COVID pandemic. Although early pandemic research expressed alarm that increased caregiving demands were reducing women's research productivity, it paid less attention to changing work demands. By contrast, this article examines whether pandemic changes in academic work demands varied across race and gender, drawing on survey data from 1198 faculty members in two university systems in the United States. Consistent with theories of institutional routines, identity taxation, and status beliefs, we find that, compared to their colleagues, women and faculty of color spent more time on service and teaching, performed more emotional labor, and experienced more burnout. Women report greater decreases than men in research productivity, but the presence of children does not fully explain these gender differences. Women are more likely to consider leaving the university, but intentions to leave are driven by their disproportionate emotional labor and service during the pandemic. Our findings provide insight into how pandemic increases in academic labor fell more heavily on some faculty members than others. They also contribute to our understanding of mechanisms that reproduce inequality in the academy.

“仓鼠轮着火了”:流行病如何放大了学术界的不平等
制度实践往往会在组织内部造成不平等,特别是在COVID大流行等危机时期。虽然早期的大流行病研究警告说,照料需求的增加正在降低妇女的研究生产力,但它对不断变化的工作需求关注较少。相比之下,本文利用对美国两所大学系统的1198名教员的调查数据,研究了学术工作需求的大流行变化是否因种族和性别而异。与制度惯例、身份税和地位信念理论相一致,我们发现,与同事相比,女性和有色人种教师花在服务和教学上的时间更多,表现出更多的情绪劳动,并且经历了更多的倦怠。女性在研究生产力方面的下降比男性更大,但是孩子的存在并不能完全解释这些性别差异。女性更有可能考虑离开大学,但离开的意图是由于她们在大流行期间不成比例的情感劳动和服务。我们的研究结果让我们了解到,学术工作的大流行对一些教员的影响比其他教员更大。它们还有助于我们理解学术界再现不平等的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Gender, Work & Organization is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal was established in 1994 and is published by John Wiley & Sons. It covers research on the role of gender on the workfloor. In addition to the regular issues, the journal publishes several special issues per year and has new section, Feminist Frontiers,dedicated to contemporary conversations and topics in feminism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书