Bridging Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Financial Resilience: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda

IF 9.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Matteo Robba, Carmela Aprea, Paola Iannello, Angela Sorgente
{"title":"Bridging Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Financial Resilience: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda","authors":"Matteo Robba,&nbsp;Carmela Aprea,&nbsp;Paola Iannello,&nbsp;Angela Sorgente","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.70174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholarly interest in financial resilience has grown significantly over the past decade, yet the literature remains fragmented, marked by conceptual ambiguity and methodological inconsistencies. This integrative review critically synthesizes research on how consumers recover from financial shocks, bridging economic and psychological perspectives to advance a multidimensional understanding of financial resilience. Guided by the SPAR-4-SLR protocol, a literature search was conducted across Scopus, PsycINFO, and EconLit databases. The final sample comprises 112 documents published between 2011 and 2025. Analyses reveal persistent gaps in both conceptualization and measurement of the construct. Resilience is often conflated with related but distinct constructs, and the adoption of robust theoretical frameworks remains limited. Empirical studies predominantly emphasize economic resources (e.g., emergency savings, income, or liquidity), while neglecting non-economic resources, such as social capital and psychological characteristics. Furthermore, existing measurement tools often fail to capture the multidimensional nature of financial resilience. To address these limitations, the study outlines directions for future research aimed at improving theoretical clarity and methodological robustness. It also proposes guidelines to reconceptualize financial resilience as a systemic and dynamic process embedded within broader social and psychological systems, and to develop context-based frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"50 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijcs.70174","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholarly interest in financial resilience has grown significantly over the past decade, yet the literature remains fragmented, marked by conceptual ambiguity and methodological inconsistencies. This integrative review critically synthesizes research on how consumers recover from financial shocks, bridging economic and psychological perspectives to advance a multidimensional understanding of financial resilience. Guided by the SPAR-4-SLR protocol, a literature search was conducted across Scopus, PsycINFO, and EconLit databases. The final sample comprises 112 documents published between 2011 and 2025. Analyses reveal persistent gaps in both conceptualization and measurement of the construct. Resilience is often conflated with related but distinct constructs, and the adoption of robust theoretical frameworks remains limited. Empirical studies predominantly emphasize economic resources (e.g., emergency savings, income, or liquidity), while neglecting non-economic resources, such as social capital and psychological characteristics. Furthermore, existing measurement tools often fail to capture the multidimensional nature of financial resilience. To address these limitations, the study outlines directions for future research aimed at improving theoretical clarity and methodological robustness. It also proposes guidelines to reconceptualize financial resilience as a systemic and dynamic process embedded within broader social and psychological systems, and to develop context-based frameworks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

衔接金融弹性的经济和心理学视角:综合回顾和研究议程
在过去十年中,对金融弹性的学术兴趣显著增长,但文献仍然支离破碎,其特点是概念模糊和方法不一致。这篇综合评论批判性地综合了消费者如何从金融冲击中恢复的研究,将经济和心理观点联系起来,以促进对金融弹性的多维理解。在SPAR-4-SLR协议的指导下,在Scopus、PsycINFO和EconLit数据库中进行文献检索。最终样本包括2011年至2025年间发表的112份文件。分析显示,在概念化和测量的结构持续的差距。弹性通常与相关但不同的结构相混淆,并且采用强大的理论框架仍然有限。实证研究主要强调经济资源(如应急储蓄、收入或流动性),而忽略了非经济资源,如社会资本和心理特征。此外,现有的衡量工具往往无法捕捉到金融弹性的多维性。为了解决这些局限性,该研究概述了未来研究的方向,旨在提高理论清晰度和方法稳健性。报告还提出了指导方针,将金融韧性重新定义为嵌入更广泛的社会和心理系统的系统和动态过程,并制定了基于背景的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书