{"title":"Access to Digital Extension Services and Crop Yield: Evidence From Paddy Cultivation in India","authors":"Chanchal Pramanik","doi":"10.1111/agec.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We examine the influence of information access on seasonal paddy yields in 10 selected Indian states using decade-long (2009–2019) data from the Government of India's <i>Kisan</i> (farmers) call center (KCC) initiative. Based on 17 million farmers' queries at the KCC, we isolate two most frequent concerns—one related to pest pressure and the other related to weather predictions. Leveraging these farmers' queries and crop yield–related datasets at the district level, we assess the impacts of weather and paddy pest infestation information on seasonal paddy yields. Endogeneity concerns are addressed using an instrumental variable (IV) approach—previous years' paddy yields and percentage gross irrigated area as IVs for pest and weather-related queries, respectively. After confirming the validity of the IVs, the results reveal that an increase in seasonal pest attacks—proxied by a 1% increase in seasonal pest-related queries from districts—decreases paddy yields by 0.028 t ha <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$^{-1}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (i.e., a decrease of 1.1% of average paddy yields). On the contrary, a 1% increase in district-level seasonal weather queries increases paddy yields by 0.008 t ha <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$^{-1}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (i.e., an increase of 0.3% of average paddy yields). Our results point to the positive contribution of paddy yield gains, while addressing proactive types of queries (i.e., weather), as well as the limitations of digital extension services, which are unable to recover the potential yield while addressing reactive types of queries (i.e., paddy pests) in a developing country.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.70099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We examine the influence of information access on seasonal paddy yields in 10 selected Indian states using decade-long (2009–2019) data from the Government of India's Kisan (farmers) call center (KCC) initiative. Based on 17 million farmers' queries at the KCC, we isolate two most frequent concerns—one related to pest pressure and the other related to weather predictions. Leveraging these farmers' queries and crop yield–related datasets at the district level, we assess the impacts of weather and paddy pest infestation information on seasonal paddy yields. Endogeneity concerns are addressed using an instrumental variable (IV) approach—previous years' paddy yields and percentage gross irrigated area as IVs for pest and weather-related queries, respectively. After confirming the validity of the IVs, the results reveal that an increase in seasonal pest attacks—proxied by a 1% increase in seasonal pest-related queries from districts—decreases paddy yields by 0.028 t ha (i.e., a decrease of 1.1% of average paddy yields). On the contrary, a 1% increase in district-level seasonal weather queries increases paddy yields by 0.008 t ha (i.e., an increase of 0.3% of average paddy yields). Our results point to the positive contribution of paddy yield gains, while addressing proactive types of queries (i.e., weather), as well as the limitations of digital extension services, which are unable to recover the potential yield while addressing reactive types of queries (i.e., paddy pests) in a developing country.
我们使用印度政府Kisan(农民)呼叫中心(KCC)计划的十年(2009-2019)数据,研究了信息获取对印度10个选定邦的季节性水稻产量的影响。根据1700万农民在KCC的查询,我们分离出两个最常见的问题——一个与害虫压力有关,另一个与天气预报有关。利用这些农民的查询和地区一级的作物产量相关数据集,我们评估了天气和水稻害虫侵害信息对季节性水稻产量的影响。内生性问题使用工具变量(IV)方法来解决-前几年的水稻产量和总灌溉面积百分比分别作为害虫和天气相关查询的IV。在验证了IVs的有效性后,结果表明,季节性害虫袭击的增加(以地区季节性害虫相关查询增加1%为代表)会使水稻产量下降0.028 tha -1 $^{-1}$(即平均水稻产量下降1.1%)。相反,区级季节性天气查询每增加1%,水稻产量就增加0.008 t ha -1 $^{-1}$(即平均水稻产量增加0.3%)。我们的研究结果指出了水稻产量增长的积极贡献,同时解决了主动类型的查询(即天气),以及数字扩展服务的局限性,在解决发展中国家被动类型的查询(即水稻害虫)时,这些服务无法恢复潜在产量。
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Economics aims to disseminate the most important research results and policy analyses in our discipline, from all regions of the world. Topical coverage ranges from consumption and nutrition to land use and the environment, at every scale of analysis from households to markets and the macro-economy. Applicable methodologies include econometric estimation and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models, descriptive reviews and policy analyses. We particularly encourage submission of empirical work that can be replicated and tested by others.