Reply to Discussion by A. Khayyer and C.H. Lee on “comparative study on volume conservation among various SPH models for flows of different levels of violence, coastal engineering, volume 191, August 2024, 104521”
{"title":"Reply to Discussion by A. Khayyer and C.H. Lee on “comparative study on volume conservation among various SPH models for flows of different levels of violence, coastal engineering, volume 191, August 2024, 104521”","authors":"M.Z. Wang , Y. Pan , P.N. Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2026.104973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This reply addresses the discussion by Khayyer and Lee (Coastal Eng., 192, 2024, 104 565) on the paper “Comparative study on volume conservation among various SPH models for flows of different levels of violence” by Wang et al. (Coastal Eng., 191, 2024, 104 521). The authors of the original paper (Wang et al., 2024) thank the discussers for their interest and comments on the presented work. Following their comments and suggestions, a further investigation is conducted. Since new volume error indicators, numerical cases, and analyses are introduced, this reply is structured as a research paper, including basic introductions to the methods, indicators, numerical cases, and analyses. More importantly, new insights are provided on the issues raised by Khayyer and Lee (2024), including the application of volume error indicators, the volume and mechanical energy conservation of different models, the volume conservation during wave shoaling, breaking and violent sloshing processes, and the effects of boundary conditions on volume conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50996,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 104973"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037838392600027X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This reply addresses the discussion by Khayyer and Lee (Coastal Eng., 192, 2024, 104 565) on the paper “Comparative study on volume conservation among various SPH models for flows of different levels of violence” by Wang et al. (Coastal Eng., 191, 2024, 104 521). The authors of the original paper (Wang et al., 2024) thank the discussers for their interest and comments on the presented work. Following their comments and suggestions, a further investigation is conducted. Since new volume error indicators, numerical cases, and analyses are introduced, this reply is structured as a research paper, including basic introductions to the methods, indicators, numerical cases, and analyses. More importantly, new insights are provided on the issues raised by Khayyer and Lee (2024), including the application of volume error indicators, the volume and mechanical energy conservation of different models, the volume conservation during wave shoaling, breaking and violent sloshing processes, and the effects of boundary conditions on volume conservation.
期刊介绍:
Coastal Engineering is an international medium for coastal engineers and scientists. Combining practical applications with modern technological and scientific approaches, such as mathematical and numerical modelling, laboratory and field observations and experiments, it publishes fundamental studies as well as case studies on the following aspects of coastal, harbour and offshore engineering: waves, currents and sediment transport; coastal, estuarine and offshore morphology; technical and functional design of coastal and harbour structures; morphological and environmental impact of coastal, harbour and offshore structures.