Gender-related facilitators and barriers to participation in research on aging using fuzzy cognitive mapping

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Neurobiology of Aging Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2026.01.009
Vasvi Dhir , Ivan Sarmiento , Isabel McDonald , Maude Gélinas Faucher , Stéfanie A. Tremblay , Mark J. Yaffe , Neil Andersson , Maiya R. Geddes
{"title":"Gender-related facilitators and barriers to participation in research on aging using fuzzy cognitive mapping","authors":"Vasvi Dhir ,&nbsp;Ivan Sarmiento ,&nbsp;Isabel McDonald ,&nbsp;Maude Gélinas Faucher ,&nbsp;Stéfanie A. Tremblay ,&nbsp;Mark J. Yaffe ,&nbsp;Neil Andersson ,&nbsp;Maiya R. Geddes","doi":"10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2026.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of cognitive neuroscience research on aging, older women are often overrepresented in observational research, whereas men are overrepresented in clinical trials. Factors underlying the selection bias between and across genders in research on aging are currently poorly understood. Addressing this knowledge gap is critical to provide guidance on how we might mitigate selection bias and improve the generalizability, robustness, and reproducibility of our findings. We aimed to identify the barriers and facilitating factors that older adults perceive when considering participation in cognitive neuroscience research that were shared across, or that differed between, older women and men. We employed fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM), a method that facilitates participation in research and action. Maps were co-created individually with research participants to identify factors, and their inter-relationships, that encouraged or hindered their participation in research. These factors were then standardized across maps, categorized through thematic analysis, and organized into group-level causal networks using graph theory methods. Our results indicated that both older women and men perceived individual psychological motivators, the quality of communication with the research team, logistic considerations and research-specific practices as key factors that influenced their participation in research. Dissociable factors between genders were also identified: Prior personal and professional experiences facilitated research engagement in women, whereas willingness to return benefits to the general population encouraged men’s research participation. These findings provide insights to guide the development of sampling strategies that enable equitable access to research and enhanced sample representativeness among women and men in research on aging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19110,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Aging","volume":"162 ","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197458026000151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of cognitive neuroscience research on aging, older women are often overrepresented in observational research, whereas men are overrepresented in clinical trials. Factors underlying the selection bias between and across genders in research on aging are currently poorly understood. Addressing this knowledge gap is critical to provide guidance on how we might mitigate selection bias and improve the generalizability, robustness, and reproducibility of our findings. We aimed to identify the barriers and facilitating factors that older adults perceive when considering participation in cognitive neuroscience research that were shared across, or that differed between, older women and men. We employed fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM), a method that facilitates participation in research and action. Maps were co-created individually with research participants to identify factors, and their inter-relationships, that encouraged or hindered their participation in research. These factors were then standardized across maps, categorized through thematic analysis, and organized into group-level causal networks using graph theory methods. Our results indicated that both older women and men perceived individual psychological motivators, the quality of communication with the research team, logistic considerations and research-specific practices as key factors that influenced their participation in research. Dissociable factors between genders were also identified: Prior personal and professional experiences facilitated research engagement in women, whereas willingness to return benefits to the general population encouraged men’s research participation. These findings provide insights to guide the development of sampling strategies that enable equitable access to research and enhanced sample representativeness among women and men in research on aging.
基于模糊认知映射的老龄化研究中与性别相关的促进因素和参与障碍
在认知神经科学衰老研究的背景下,老年女性在观察性研究中经常被过多地代表,而男性在临床试验中被过多地代表。在老龄化研究中,性别之间和性别之间的选择偏差背后的因素目前知之甚少。解决这一知识差距对于我们如何减轻选择偏差、提高研究结果的普遍性、稳健性和可重复性提供指导至关重要。我们的目的是确定老年人在考虑参与认知神经科学研究时所感受到的障碍和促进因素,这些障碍和促进因素在老年女性和男性之间是共同的,或者是不同的。我们采用模糊认知映射(FCM),一种促进参与研究和行动的方法。地图是与研究参与者单独共同创建的,以确定鼓励或阻碍他们参与研究的因素及其相互关系。然后,这些因素在地图上标准化,通过主题分析进行分类,并使用图论方法组织成群体级因果网络。我们的研究结果表明,老年女性和男性都认为个人心理激励因素、与研究团队的沟通质量、逻辑考虑和研究特定实践是影响他们参与研究的关键因素。性别之间的可分离因素也被确定:先前的个人和职业经历促进了女性的研究参与,而愿意将利益回报给一般人群则鼓励了男性的研究参与。这些发现为指导抽样策略的发展提供了见解,这些策略能够在老年研究中实现公平获取研究并增强女性和男性的样本代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Aging
Neurobiology of Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
225
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Aging publishes the results of studies in behavior, biochemistry, cell biology, endocrinology, molecular biology, morphology, neurology, neuropathology, pharmacology, physiology and protein chemistry in which the primary emphasis involves mechanisms of nervous system changes with age or diseases associated with age. Reviews and primary research articles are included, occasionally accompanied by open peer commentary. Letters to the Editor and brief communications are also acceptable. Brief reports of highly time-sensitive material are usually treated as rapid communications in which case editorial review is completed within six weeks and publication scheduled for the next available issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书