Machine learning for forecasting production in tight oil reservoirs: Application to the Bakken formation of Williston basin

IF 4.6
Unconventional Resources Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.uncres.2026.100335
Yeonpyeong Jo , Rasoul B. Sorkhabi , Palash Panja , Milind Deo
{"title":"Machine learning for forecasting production in tight oil reservoirs: Application to the Bakken formation of Williston basin","authors":"Yeonpyeong Jo ,&nbsp;Rasoul B. Sorkhabi ,&nbsp;Palash Panja ,&nbsp;Milind Deo","doi":"10.1016/j.uncres.2026.100335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the tremendous growth of oil production from tight reservoirs in the US, characterizing and forecasting these tight formations faces significant uncertainties and risks. Machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as insightful complementary methods to physics-based unconventional reservoir simulations for predicting oil production due to complex reservoir properties that make traditional modeling challenging. This study applies ML approaches to predict oil production from the Bakken formation in the Williston basin and employs normalized production indices (NPIs) by normalizing cumulative oil production with time and completion parameters. Key parameters include surface coordinates, lateral perforated length, total base water volume and total proppant used in hydraulic fracturing, number of stimulated fracture stages, and water volume and proppant per stimulated fracture stage. Five scenarios were analyzed: raw cumulative oil and four NPIs. Feature importance analysis was conducted using SHAP, followed by prediction using random forest, XGBoost, and Multilayer perceptron. Results revealed that well location ranked among the top features, demonstrating superior production potential at the eastern Bakken formation. Total base water and water volume per fracture stage showed a contrasting trend, indicating that the water distribution strategy is critical for stage-level performance. Proppant variables displayed complex non-monotonic relationships with multiple optimal ranges. XGBoost outperformed other algorithms. Stage-normalized NPI<sub>2</sub> achieved optimal prediction accuracy with 37% improvement in R<sup>2</sup> compared to raw cumulative oil, while spacing-normalized NPI<sub>3</sub> offered the most practical implementation. These findings demonstrate that completion optimization strategies should align with specific production objectives, providing quantitative guidance for improved capital efficiency in unconventional oil development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101263,"journal":{"name":"Unconventional Resources","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100335"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unconventional Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666519026000324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the tremendous growth of oil production from tight reservoirs in the US, characterizing and forecasting these tight formations faces significant uncertainties and risks. Machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as insightful complementary methods to physics-based unconventional reservoir simulations for predicting oil production due to complex reservoir properties that make traditional modeling challenging. This study applies ML approaches to predict oil production from the Bakken formation in the Williston basin and employs normalized production indices (NPIs) by normalizing cumulative oil production with time and completion parameters. Key parameters include surface coordinates, lateral perforated length, total base water volume and total proppant used in hydraulic fracturing, number of stimulated fracture stages, and water volume and proppant per stimulated fracture stage. Five scenarios were analyzed: raw cumulative oil and four NPIs. Feature importance analysis was conducted using SHAP, followed by prediction using random forest, XGBoost, and Multilayer perceptron. Results revealed that well location ranked among the top features, demonstrating superior production potential at the eastern Bakken formation. Total base water and water volume per fracture stage showed a contrasting trend, indicating that the water distribution strategy is critical for stage-level performance. Proppant variables displayed complex non-monotonic relationships with multiple optimal ranges. XGBoost outperformed other algorithms. Stage-normalized NPI2 achieved optimal prediction accuracy with 37% improvement in R2 compared to raw cumulative oil, while spacing-normalized NPI3 offered the most practical implementation. These findings demonstrate that completion optimization strategies should align with specific production objectives, providing quantitative guidance for improved capital efficiency in unconventional oil development.

Abstract Image

致密油储层产量预测的机器学习方法:在威利斯顿盆地Bakken组的应用
尽管美国致密储层的石油产量大幅增长,但这些致密储层的特征和预测面临着巨大的不确定性和风险。由于复杂的储层性质使传统建模具有挑战性,机器学习(ML)技术已经成为基于物理的非常规储层模拟的有见地的补充方法,用于预测石油产量。该研究应用ML方法预测Williston盆地Bakken地层的产油量,并通过将累积产油量随时间和完井参数归一化,采用归一化生产指数(npi)。关键参数包括地面坐标、侧向射孔长度、水力压裂总基础水量和总支撑剂用量、压裂段数、每个压裂段的水量和支撑剂用量。分析了五种情况:原始累积油和四种npi。使用SHAP进行特征重要性分析,然后使用随机森林、XGBoost和多层感知器进行预测。结果显示,该井的井位是最重要的特征之一,表明Bakken地层东部具有优越的生产潜力。总基水和每个压裂段的水量呈现出对比趋势,表明配水策略对压裂段级性能至关重要。支撑剂变量在多个最优范围内表现出复杂的非单调关系。XGBoost优于其他算法。阶段归一化NPI2达到了最佳的预测精度,与原始累积油相比,R2提高了37%,而间隔归一化NPI3提供了最实用的实现方法。这些研究结果表明,完井优化策略应该与特定的生产目标相一致,为提高非常规石油开发的资本效率提供定量指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书