Underground hydrogen storage capacity in saline aquifer

IF 11.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy Conversion and Management Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121195
Chuanjie Ren , Xiaojiang Li , Ziqing Pan , Kaiqiang Zhang
{"title":"Underground hydrogen storage capacity in saline aquifer","authors":"Chuanjie Ren ,&nbsp;Xiaojiang Li ,&nbsp;Ziqing Pan ,&nbsp;Kaiqiang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Underground hydrogen storage in saline aquifers is an irreplaceable option for large-scale hydrogen usage amid the transition to net-zero, with the urgent demand for clean energy. However, accurate hydrogen storage capacity evaluation is currently hindered by the lack of accessible analytical tools that simultaneously account for engineering constraints and hydrogen-specific biogeochemical losses. To address these gaps, this study hypothesizes that explicitly coupling engineering constraints with quantitative sink terms for microbial consumption and dissolution and diffusive loss will define a net effective capacity that provides a rigorous, safety-constrained baseline distinct from static volumetric estimates. We developed a novel first-order basin-scale screening tool that integrates transport dynamics, equations of state. This framework serves as a theoretical upper-bound estimator designed to evaluate the maximum hydrogen storage capacity subject to engineering constraints and quantitative losses, distinct from predictive reservoir simulations. Applying of the model to a representative basin-scale aquifer, a set of 10 wells with inter-well distance of 5.2 km was determined to reach 1.5 Gt storage volume. Moreover, a total of eleven factors, regarding the reservoir parameters, fluid properties, engineering strategies, and their effects on the hydrogen storage capacity, were specifically analyzed. Results show that long operational time (i.e., 1000 years) usually results in increased storage volume to reach the maximum storage capacity. We conclude that while saline aquifers offer huge storage potential, their technical feasibility is strictly governed by the coupling of hydraulic injectivity and operational time. Overall, this study provides a powerful tool for accurately and efficiently quantifying hydrogen storage capacity and optimizing strategies in saline aquifer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 121195"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890426001640","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Underground hydrogen storage in saline aquifers is an irreplaceable option for large-scale hydrogen usage amid the transition to net-zero, with the urgent demand for clean energy. However, accurate hydrogen storage capacity evaluation is currently hindered by the lack of accessible analytical tools that simultaneously account for engineering constraints and hydrogen-specific biogeochemical losses. To address these gaps, this study hypothesizes that explicitly coupling engineering constraints with quantitative sink terms for microbial consumption and dissolution and diffusive loss will define a net effective capacity that provides a rigorous, safety-constrained baseline distinct from static volumetric estimates. We developed a novel first-order basin-scale screening tool that integrates transport dynamics, equations of state. This framework serves as a theoretical upper-bound estimator designed to evaluate the maximum hydrogen storage capacity subject to engineering constraints and quantitative losses, distinct from predictive reservoir simulations. Applying of the model to a representative basin-scale aquifer, a set of 10 wells with inter-well distance of 5.2 km was determined to reach 1.5 Gt storage volume. Moreover, a total of eleven factors, regarding the reservoir parameters, fluid properties, engineering strategies, and their effects on the hydrogen storage capacity, were specifically analyzed. Results show that long operational time (i.e., 1000 years) usually results in increased storage volume to reach the maximum storage capacity. We conclude that while saline aquifers offer huge storage potential, their technical feasibility is strictly governed by the coupling of hydraulic injectivity and operational time. Overall, this study provides a powerful tool for accurately and efficiently quantifying hydrogen storage capacity and optimizing strategies in saline aquifer.

Abstract Image

盐碱层地下储氢能力
随着对清洁能源的迫切需求,在向净零转型的过程中,盐碱层地下储氢是大规模使用氢的不可替代的选择。然而,由于缺乏可访问的分析工具,同时考虑工程限制和氢特异性生物地球化学损失,目前阻碍了准确的储氢能力评估。为了解决这些差距,本研究假设将工程约束与微生物消耗、溶解和扩散损失的定量汇项明确耦合,将定义一个净有效容量,该容量提供了一个严格的、安全约束的基线,与静态体积估算不同。我们开发了一种新的一阶盆地尺度筛选工具,该工具集成了输运动力学、状态方程。该框架作为理论上的上限估计器,旨在评估受工程约束和定量损失影响的最大储氢容量,与预测油藏模拟不同。将该模型应用于具有代表性的盆地尺度含水层,确定了一组10口井,井间距离为5.2 km,库容达到1.5 Gt。具体分析了储层参数、流体性质、工程策略等11个因素对储氢能力的影响。结果表明,较长的运行时间(即1000年)通常会导致存储量增加,以达到最大存储容量。我们得出的结论是,尽管咸水含水层具有巨大的储存潜力,但其技术可行性严格取决于水力注入能力和操作时间的耦合。综上所述,本研究为准确、高效地定量盐碱层储氢能力和优化储氢策略提供了有力的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书