Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from biomass and RDF gasification with integrated carbon Capture: A Brazilian Perspective

IF 11.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy Conversion and Management Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121185
Diogo Josué de Souza Santos , Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano Julio , York Castillo Santiago , Osvaldo José Venturini , José Carlos Escobar Palacio
{"title":"Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from biomass and RDF gasification with integrated carbon Capture: A Brazilian Perspective","authors":"Diogo Josué de Souza Santos ,&nbsp;Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano Julio ,&nbsp;York Castillo Santiago ,&nbsp;Osvaldo José Venturini ,&nbsp;José Carlos Escobar Palacio","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For this study, sugarcane bagasse and Refuse-Derived Fuel from Municipal Solid Waste gasification were investigated for low-emission hydrogen production. This is done through a unique simulation that integrates Aspen Plus® and Hysys® to present a detailed analysis considering the Brazilian availability of sugarcane bagasse and Refuse-Derived Fuel. A chemical equilibrium model was developed and validated in Aspen Plus® using various gasifying agents. A sensitivity analysis of the equivalence ratio was conducted, revealing a temperature increase from 700 to 900°C when using air as the gasifying agent. The gasification temperature ranged from 550 to 750°C when employing air and steam with a fixed SBR of 1. The highest hydrogen volumetric fraction for Refuse-Derived Fuel was 0.25, while for sugarcane bagasse gasification, it was 0.22. Additionally, the addition of shift reactors favors hydrogen production, increasing the hydrogen mass flow rate by approximately 90% in the gasification plant. The plants achieved an overall efficiency of around 50% for all evaluated scenarios, but the efficiency was reduced to about 40% with the addition of the carbon capture system. Besides, the levelized cost of hydrogen ranged between 4 and 4.5 US$/kgH<sub>2</sub> and 5 and 6 US$/kgH<sub>2</sub> in the gasification system with carbon capture. The results of this study suggest that biomass-hydrogen-based processes are promising options contributing to H<sub>2</sub> production capacity, but improvements are needed to achieve significant volumes and competitive costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 121185"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890426001548","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For this study, sugarcane bagasse and Refuse-Derived Fuel from Municipal Solid Waste gasification were investigated for low-emission hydrogen production. This is done through a unique simulation that integrates Aspen Plus® and Hysys® to present a detailed analysis considering the Brazilian availability of sugarcane bagasse and Refuse-Derived Fuel. A chemical equilibrium model was developed and validated in Aspen Plus® using various gasifying agents. A sensitivity analysis of the equivalence ratio was conducted, revealing a temperature increase from 700 to 900°C when using air as the gasifying agent. The gasification temperature ranged from 550 to 750°C when employing air and steam with a fixed SBR of 1. The highest hydrogen volumetric fraction for Refuse-Derived Fuel was 0.25, while for sugarcane bagasse gasification, it was 0.22. Additionally, the addition of shift reactors favors hydrogen production, increasing the hydrogen mass flow rate by approximately 90% in the gasification plant. The plants achieved an overall efficiency of around 50% for all evaluated scenarios, but the efficiency was reduced to about 40% with the addition of the carbon capture system. Besides, the levelized cost of hydrogen ranged between 4 and 4.5 US$/kgH2 and 5 and 6 US$/kgH2 in the gasification system with carbon capture. The results of this study suggest that biomass-hydrogen-based processes are promising options contributing to H2 production capacity, but improvements are needed to achieve significant volumes and competitive costs.

Abstract Image

结合碳捕获的生物质和RDF气化制氢的技术经济评估:巴西视角
在本研究中,研究了蔗渣和城市生活垃圾气化垃圾衍生燃料用于低排放制氢。这是通过整合Aspen Plus®和Hysys®的独特模拟来完成的,以提供考虑到巴西蔗渣和垃圾衍生燃料可用性的详细分析。在Aspen Plus®中使用各种气化剂开发并验证了化学平衡模型。对等效比进行了敏感性分析,发现当使用空气作为气化剂时,温度从700℃升高到900℃。当采用固定SBR为1的空气和蒸汽时,气化温度范围为550至750°C。垃圾衍生燃料的最高氢体积分数为0.25,而蔗渣气化的最高氢体积分数为0.22。此外,移位反应器的增加有利于氢气的生产,在气化装置中增加了大约90%的氢气质量流率。在所有评估方案中,工厂的总效率约为50%,但在增加碳捕获系统后,效率降至约40%。此外,在具有碳捕获的气化系统中,氢气的平准化成本在4至4.5美元/kgH2之间,在5至6美元/kgH2之间。这项研究的结果表明,生物质氢为基础的工艺是有前途的选择,有助于H2的生产能力,但需要改进,以实现显著的产量和具有竞争力的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书