Process integration of turquoise hydrogen via natural gas pyrolysis for blast furnace ironmaking: techno-economic viability and CO2 mitigation

IF 11.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy Conversion and Management Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121211
Dohee Kim , Jinsu Kim , Jinwoo Park
{"title":"Process integration of turquoise hydrogen via natural gas pyrolysis for blast furnace ironmaking: techno-economic viability and CO2 mitigation","authors":"Dohee Kim ,&nbsp;Jinsu Kim ,&nbsp;Jinwoo Park","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Efforts to decarbonize the steel sector primarily follow two pathways: the use of alternative low-carbon fuels (e.g., hydrogen, ammonia) for blast furnace (BF)-based ironmaking, and the adoption of electrified processes utilizing direct reduced iron in electric arc furnace-based ironmaking. In this study, synergistic process integration is proposed for hydrogen-based BF ironmaking, and its techno-economic and environmental impacts are assessed. Turquoise hydrogen, produced via natural gas pyrolysis, is designed across four cases to examine how variations in injection temperature and hydrogen purity affect the balance among process design, economic performance, and CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation potential. Heat supply strategies, including hydrogen purification units, are also considered. Each case is evaluated in terms of energy consumption, BF injection performance, economic feasibility, and environmental impact. The findings reveal that Case A achieved the highest energy efficiency of 60.4%, while Case D showed the lowest at 47.6%. Regarding BF performance, increasing the injection temperature of high-purity H<sub>2</sub> improved the H<sub>2</sub>-to-coke replacement ratio from 1.10 to 1.46 kg_coke/Nm<sup>3</sup>-gas, enabling a significantly higher H<sub>2</sub> injection rate of up to 41 kg<sub>H2</sub>/tHM. Economically, the integration proved highly competitive due to the solid carbon byproduct; Case D achieved the most favorable unit production cost (UPC) of − 0.29 US$/kg-gas, compared to 0.016 US$/kg-gas for Case A. Environmentally, Case D also demonstrated the superior sustainability profile with a net-negative CO<sub>2</sub> emission of − 7.43 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq./kg-gas. Overall, the proposed integration of turquoise H<sub>2</sub> with BF ironmaking demonstrates strong economic and environmental performance. A remaining challenge is determining the optimal degree of hydrogen purification for alternative applications within the ironmaking process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 121211"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890426001809","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efforts to decarbonize the steel sector primarily follow two pathways: the use of alternative low-carbon fuels (e.g., hydrogen, ammonia) for blast furnace (BF)-based ironmaking, and the adoption of electrified processes utilizing direct reduced iron in electric arc furnace-based ironmaking. In this study, synergistic process integration is proposed for hydrogen-based BF ironmaking, and its techno-economic and environmental impacts are assessed. Turquoise hydrogen, produced via natural gas pyrolysis, is designed across four cases to examine how variations in injection temperature and hydrogen purity affect the balance among process design, economic performance, and CO2 mitigation potential. Heat supply strategies, including hydrogen purification units, are also considered. Each case is evaluated in terms of energy consumption, BF injection performance, economic feasibility, and environmental impact. The findings reveal that Case A achieved the highest energy efficiency of 60.4%, while Case D showed the lowest at 47.6%. Regarding BF performance, increasing the injection temperature of high-purity H2 improved the H2-to-coke replacement ratio from 1.10 to 1.46 kg_coke/Nm3-gas, enabling a significantly higher H2 injection rate of up to 41 kgH2/tHM. Economically, the integration proved highly competitive due to the solid carbon byproduct; Case D achieved the most favorable unit production cost (UPC) of − 0.29 US$/kg-gas, compared to 0.016 US$/kg-gas for Case A. Environmentally, Case D also demonstrated the superior sustainability profile with a net-negative CO2 emission of − 7.43 kg CO2-eq./kg-gas. Overall, the proposed integration of turquoise H2 with BF ironmaking demonstrates strong economic and environmental performance. A remaining challenge is determining the optimal degree of hydrogen purification for alternative applications within the ironmaking process.

Abstract Image

通过天然气热解将绿松石氢用于高炉炼铁的工艺整合:技术经济可行性和二氧化碳减排
使钢铁部门脱碳的努力主要遵循两条途径:在高炉炼铁中使用替代低碳燃料(例如氢、氨),以及在电弧炉炼铁中采用利用直接还原铁的电气化工艺。本研究提出了氢基高炉炼铁协同工艺整合方案,并对其技术经济和环境影响进行了评价。通过天然气热解生产的绿松石氢气分为四种情况,以研究注射温度和氢气纯度的变化如何影响工艺设计、经济性能和二氧化碳减排潜力之间的平衡。包括氢净化装置在内的供热策略也被考虑在内。每个案例都在能耗、高炉喷注性能、经济可行性和环境影响方面进行了评估。结果显示,案例A的能源效率最高,达到60.4%,而案例D的能源效率最低,为47.6%。在高炉性能方面,提高高纯H2的注入温度,使H2与焦炭的替代比从1.10 kg_coke/Nm3-gas提高到1.46 kg_coke/Nm3-gas,使H2的注入速率显著提高,达到41 kgH2/tHM。经济上,由于固体碳副产品的存在,该整合具有很强的竞争力;案例D实现了最有利的单位生产成本(UPC),为- 0.29美元/千克气体,而案例a的UPC为0.016美元/千克气体。在环境方面,案例D还展示了卓越的可持续性,净负二氧化碳排放量为- 7.43千克二氧化碳当量/千克气体。总体而言,将绿松石H2与高炉炼铁相结合的建议具有很强的经济和环境效益。剩下的挑战是确定在炼铁过程中替代应用的最佳氢净化程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书