{"title":"Exploring preferences for demand-responsive transport in rural Japan: An integrated probabilistic choice set and latent variable approach","authors":"Yuanfang Zhu , Meilan Jiang , Takayuki Morikawa , Toshiyuki Yamamoto , Zhijian Zhao , Hitomi Sato , Yusaku Ogai , Misaki Nakashita , Shizuko Matsuzoe , Miwa Ueki","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2026.104919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although demand-responsive transport (DRT) has been proposed as an innovative mobility solution to enhance accessibility in rural areas, its adoption and utilization remain low. To facilitate broader acceptance, it is essential to identify the factors influencing individuals’ willingness to use such services. This study examined preferences for DRT based on stated preference data collected from 610 respondents in a rural region of Japan. The analysis showed low willingness to use the service, with 75.4% of respondents indicating that they would not utilize it for any trip purpose, regardless of service attributes. To explicitly account for this non-compensatory behavior, an integrated probabilistic choice set and latent variable (IPCSLV) model was developed. Compared with traditional choice models, the IPCSLV model demonstrated a superior fit and yielded more interpretable results. The findings indicated that older adults aged ≥ 75 years, non-drivers, and individuals who were aware of the nearest bus stop were more likely to consider DRT as a transport alternative. Positive perceptions of DRT were also linked to higher levels of acceptance, with participation in the demonstration trial contributing to the development of these favorable views. Among those who considered DRT, service was most preferred for trips to the railway station, and cost emerged as the most influential service-related factor affecting usage. These insights support the design of tailored services that target the specific user groups identified in the analysis. While individuals with high car dependency were more likely to exclude DRT, offering free trial opportunities may encourage them to consider adopting DRT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 104919"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426000601","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although demand-responsive transport (DRT) has been proposed as an innovative mobility solution to enhance accessibility in rural areas, its adoption and utilization remain low. To facilitate broader acceptance, it is essential to identify the factors influencing individuals’ willingness to use such services. This study examined preferences for DRT based on stated preference data collected from 610 respondents in a rural region of Japan. The analysis showed low willingness to use the service, with 75.4% of respondents indicating that they would not utilize it for any trip purpose, regardless of service attributes. To explicitly account for this non-compensatory behavior, an integrated probabilistic choice set and latent variable (IPCSLV) model was developed. Compared with traditional choice models, the IPCSLV model demonstrated a superior fit and yielded more interpretable results. The findings indicated that older adults aged ≥ 75 years, non-drivers, and individuals who were aware of the nearest bus stop were more likely to consider DRT as a transport alternative. Positive perceptions of DRT were also linked to higher levels of acceptance, with participation in the demonstration trial contributing to the development of these favorable views. Among those who considered DRT, service was most preferred for trips to the railway station, and cost emerged as the most influential service-related factor affecting usage. These insights support the design of tailored services that target the specific user groups identified in the analysis. While individuals with high car dependency were more likely to exclude DRT, offering free trial opportunities may encourage them to consider adopting DRT.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.