Tinghe Zhang , Ang Li , Lingxiao Wu , Changmin Jiang
{"title":"Airport accessibility assessment and shuttle bus scheduling across socioeconomic groups","authors":"Tinghe Zhang , Ang Li , Lingxiao Wu , Changmin Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2026.104918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Airport accessibility is a critical factor influencing air travel behavior, particularly for low-income travelers who face both economic and transit-related constraints. This study proposes the Fairness Airport Accessibility Metric (FAAM), a novel measure that captures disparities in accessibility across income groups by incorporating variations in travel options and behavioral responses. Building on this metric, we develop a dual-perspective, two-stage Airport Bus Scheduling and Allocation Model that reflects the differing priorities of public stakeholders. The government-led model first maximizes accessibility to ensure fair transit access across income groups, then minimizes operational costs under fairness constraints. The operator-led model, in contrast, begins by minimizing costs while maintaining baseline accessibility, and subsequently improves accessibility within those budgetary limits, capturing the trade-off between fairness and efficiency from both policy and operational standpoints. To validate the framework, we conduct a case study in Hong Kong, using actual flight schedules from Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) combined with a synthetically constructed public transit network. The case study confirms significant spatial and income-based disparities in current airport accessibility and demonstrates the necessity of differentiated planning for diverse socioeconomic groups. Numerical experiments reveal that over-prioritizing low-income users can lead to underutilized system capacity, while favoring high-income users may improve overall efficiency but widen accessibility gaps. A balanced, fairness-driven weighting scheme provides inclusive service delivery without compromising operational feasibility. The findings highlight the importance of integrating income-responsive transit planning, fairness-aware scheduling algorithms, and targeted fare policies. Together, these strategies provide a scalable and adaptable framework for designing airport ground access systems that are both socially inclusive and operationally sustainable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 104918"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426000595","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Airport accessibility is a critical factor influencing air travel behavior, particularly for low-income travelers who face both economic and transit-related constraints. This study proposes the Fairness Airport Accessibility Metric (FAAM), a novel measure that captures disparities in accessibility across income groups by incorporating variations in travel options and behavioral responses. Building on this metric, we develop a dual-perspective, two-stage Airport Bus Scheduling and Allocation Model that reflects the differing priorities of public stakeholders. The government-led model first maximizes accessibility to ensure fair transit access across income groups, then minimizes operational costs under fairness constraints. The operator-led model, in contrast, begins by minimizing costs while maintaining baseline accessibility, and subsequently improves accessibility within those budgetary limits, capturing the trade-off between fairness and efficiency from both policy and operational standpoints. To validate the framework, we conduct a case study in Hong Kong, using actual flight schedules from Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) combined with a synthetically constructed public transit network. The case study confirms significant spatial and income-based disparities in current airport accessibility and demonstrates the necessity of differentiated planning for diverse socioeconomic groups. Numerical experiments reveal that over-prioritizing low-income users can lead to underutilized system capacity, while favoring high-income users may improve overall efficiency but widen accessibility gaps. A balanced, fairness-driven weighting scheme provides inclusive service delivery without compromising operational feasibility. The findings highlight the importance of integrating income-responsive transit planning, fairness-aware scheduling algorithms, and targeted fare policies. Together, these strategies provide a scalable and adaptable framework for designing airport ground access systems that are both socially inclusive and operationally sustainable.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.