Airport accessibility assessment and shuttle bus scheduling across socioeconomic groups

IF 7.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tinghe Zhang , Ang Li , Lingxiao Wu , Changmin Jiang
{"title":"Airport accessibility assessment and shuttle bus scheduling across socioeconomic groups","authors":"Tinghe Zhang ,&nbsp;Ang Li ,&nbsp;Lingxiao Wu ,&nbsp;Changmin Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2026.104918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Airport accessibility is a critical factor influencing air travel behavior, particularly for low-income travelers who face both economic and transit-related constraints. This study proposes the Fairness Airport Accessibility Metric (FAAM), a novel measure that captures disparities in accessibility across income groups by incorporating variations in travel options and behavioral responses. Building on this metric, we develop a dual-perspective, two-stage Airport Bus Scheduling and Allocation Model that reflects the differing priorities of public stakeholders. The government-led model first maximizes accessibility to ensure fair transit access across income groups, then minimizes operational costs under fairness constraints. The operator-led model, in contrast, begins by minimizing costs while maintaining baseline accessibility, and subsequently improves accessibility within those budgetary limits, capturing the trade-off between fairness and efficiency from both policy and operational standpoints. To validate the framework, we conduct a case study in Hong Kong, using actual flight schedules from Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) combined with a synthetically constructed public transit network. The case study confirms significant spatial and income-based disparities in current airport accessibility and demonstrates the necessity of differentiated planning for diverse socioeconomic groups. Numerical experiments reveal that over-prioritizing low-income users can lead to underutilized system capacity, while favoring high-income users may improve overall efficiency but widen accessibility gaps. A balanced, fairness-driven weighting scheme provides inclusive service delivery without compromising operational feasibility. The findings highlight the importance of integrating income-responsive transit planning, fairness-aware scheduling algorithms, and targeted fare policies. Together, these strategies provide a scalable and adaptable framework for designing airport ground access systems that are both socially inclusive and operationally sustainable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 104918"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426000595","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Airport accessibility is a critical factor influencing air travel behavior, particularly for low-income travelers who face both economic and transit-related constraints. This study proposes the Fairness Airport Accessibility Metric (FAAM), a novel measure that captures disparities in accessibility across income groups by incorporating variations in travel options and behavioral responses. Building on this metric, we develop a dual-perspective, two-stage Airport Bus Scheduling and Allocation Model that reflects the differing priorities of public stakeholders. The government-led model first maximizes accessibility to ensure fair transit access across income groups, then minimizes operational costs under fairness constraints. The operator-led model, in contrast, begins by minimizing costs while maintaining baseline accessibility, and subsequently improves accessibility within those budgetary limits, capturing the trade-off between fairness and efficiency from both policy and operational standpoints. To validate the framework, we conduct a case study in Hong Kong, using actual flight schedules from Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) combined with a synthetically constructed public transit network. The case study confirms significant spatial and income-based disparities in current airport accessibility and demonstrates the necessity of differentiated planning for diverse socioeconomic groups. Numerical experiments reveal that over-prioritizing low-income users can lead to underutilized system capacity, while favoring high-income users may improve overall efficiency but widen accessibility gaps. A balanced, fairness-driven weighting scheme provides inclusive service delivery without compromising operational feasibility. The findings highlight the importance of integrating income-responsive transit planning, fairness-aware scheduling algorithms, and targeted fare policies. Together, these strategies provide a scalable and adaptable framework for designing airport ground access systems that are both socially inclusive and operationally sustainable.
机场可达性评估与社会经济群体穿梭巴士调度
机场可达性是影响航空旅行行为的一个关键因素,特别是对于面临经济和过境相关限制的低收入旅行者而言。本研究提出了公平机场可达性指标(FAAM),这是一种通过结合旅行选择和行为反应的变化来捕捉不同收入群体可达性差异的新指标。在此度量标准的基础上,我们开发了一个双视角、两阶段的机场巴士调度和分配模型,该模型反映了公共利益相关者的不同优先级。政府主导的模式首先最大限度地提高可达性,以确保不同收入群体的公平交通,然后在公平约束下最大限度地降低运营成本。相比之下,作业者主导的模式从最小化成本开始,同时保持基线可达性,随后在预算限制内提高可达性,从政策和操作的角度捕捉公平性和效率之间的权衡。为了验证这个框架,我们以香港为例进行了研究,利用香港国际机场的实际航班时刻表,结合综合建设的公共交通网络。案例研究证实了当前机场可达性存在显著的空间差异和收入差异,并证明了对不同社会经济群体进行差异化规划的必要性。数值实验表明,过度优先考虑低收入用户可能会导致系统容量利用率不足,而优先考虑高收入用户可能会提高整体效率,但会扩大可及性差距。一个平衡的、公平驱动的加权方案在不影响运营可行性的情况下提供包容性的服务。研究结果强调了整合收入响应型交通规划、公平调度算法和有针对性的票价政策的重要性。总之,这些策略为设计既具有社会包容性又具有运营可持续性的机场地面通道系统提供了一个可扩展和适应性强的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书