Research paradigms and scales of asphalt pavement skid resistance evaluation: A review

IF 8.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Zihang Weng, Chenglong Liu, Yuchuan Du, Zhen Leng, Difei Wu, Bryan T. Adey
{"title":"Research paradigms and scales of asphalt pavement skid resistance evaluation: A review","authors":"Zihang Weng, Chenglong Liu, Yuchuan Du, Zhen Leng, Difei Wu, Bryan T. Adey","doi":"10.26599/frict.2025.9441082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" <p> Understanding the tire‒road friction system is fundamental for evaluating the skid resistance of asphalt pavements. Literature analysis reveals that the trajectory of tire–road friction research aligns with the evolution of scientific research paradigms: experimental science, theoretical science, computational science, and data science. Research in this field can be categorized into three scales: the rubber‒pavement scale, the tire‒road scale, and the vehicle scale. Experimental observations have yielded numerous patterns and empirical models, which serve as the foundation of this research field. Although numerical measurement devices have been used for decades, the reproducibility and comparability of the results require further improvement. Tire‒road friction theory and simulations have been well developed across these three scales, but these scales remain largely independent and unconnected. With the advancement of sensing technology, texture features have been widely exploited and used as inputs for various machine learning models to estimate pavement skid resistance. However, these models are limited in their ability to integrate friction mechanisms, resulting in relatively low interpretability. In summary, the synergistic development of the four research paradigms can promote and advance the understanding and application of tire‒road friction mechanisms. This review concludes with a discussion of current challenges and future trends, drawing implications for further research in this field.</p> ","PeriodicalId":12442,"journal":{"name":"Friction","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Friction","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26599/frict.2025.9441082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the tire‒road friction system is fundamental for evaluating the skid resistance of asphalt pavements. Literature analysis reveals that the trajectory of tire–road friction research aligns with the evolution of scientific research paradigms: experimental science, theoretical science, computational science, and data science. Research in this field can be categorized into three scales: the rubber‒pavement scale, the tire‒road scale, and the vehicle scale. Experimental observations have yielded numerous patterns and empirical models, which serve as the foundation of this research field. Although numerical measurement devices have been used for decades, the reproducibility and comparability of the results require further improvement. Tire‒road friction theory and simulations have been well developed across these three scales, but these scales remain largely independent and unconnected. With the advancement of sensing technology, texture features have been widely exploited and used as inputs for various machine learning models to estimate pavement skid resistance. However, these models are limited in their ability to integrate friction mechanisms, resulting in relatively low interpretability. In summary, the synergistic development of the four research paradigms can promote and advance the understanding and application of tire‒road friction mechanisms. This review concludes with a discussion of current challenges and future trends, drawing implications for further research in this field.

Abstract Image

沥青路面抗滑性评价的研究范式与尺度综述
了解轮胎-路面摩擦系统是评价沥青路面防滑性能的基础。文献分析表明,轮胎-路面摩擦研究的发展轨迹与实验科学、理论科学、计算科学和数据科学等科学研究范式的演进相一致。该领域的研究可分为三个尺度:橡胶路面尺度、轮胎路面尺度和车辆尺度。实验观察产生了许多模式和经验模型,这些模式和模型是本研究领域的基础。虽然数值测量设备已经使用了几十年,但结果的可重复性和可比性需要进一步改进。轮胎-路面摩擦理论和模拟已经在这三个尺度上得到了很好的发展,但这些尺度在很大程度上仍然是独立和不相关的。随着传感技术的进步,纹理特征已被广泛利用,并作为各种机器学习模型的输入来估计路面防滑性。然而,这些模型在整合摩擦机制方面的能力有限,导致相对较低的可解释性。综上所述,四种研究范式的协同发展可以促进和推进对轮胎-路面摩擦机理的理解和应用。本文最后讨论了当前的挑战和未来的趋势,并对该领域的进一步研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Friction
Friction Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
13.20%
发文量
324
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Friction is a peer-reviewed international journal for the publication of theoretical and experimental research works related to the friction, lubrication and wear. Original, high quality research papers and review articles on all aspects of tribology are welcome, including, but are not limited to, a variety of topics, such as: Friction: Origin of friction, Friction theories, New phenomena of friction, Nano-friction, Ultra-low friction, Molecular friction, Ultra-high friction, Friction at high speed, Friction at high temperature or low temperature, Friction at solid/liquid interfaces, Bio-friction, Adhesion, etc. Lubrication: Superlubricity, Green lubricants, Nano-lubrication, Boundary lubrication, Thin film lubrication, Elastohydrodynamic lubrication, Mixed lubrication, New lubricants, New additives, Gas lubrication, Solid lubrication, etc. Wear: Wear materials, Wear mechanism, Wear models, Wear in severe conditions, Wear measurement, Wear monitoring, etc. Surface Engineering: Surface texturing, Molecular films, Surface coatings, Surface modification, Bionic surfaces, etc. Basic Sciences: Tribology system, Principles of tribology, Thermodynamics of tribo-systems, Micro-fluidics, Thermal stability of tribo-systems, etc. Friction is an open access journal. It is published quarterly by Tsinghua University Press and Springer, and sponsored by the State Key Laboratory of Tribology (TsinghuaUniversity) and the Tribology Institute of Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书