Scaling biofortified wheat production for agrifood and nutritional security in eastern India: Evidence from five years of multi-location field evaluations in Bihar
{"title":"Scaling biofortified wheat production for agrifood and nutritional security in eastern India: Evidence from five years of multi-location field evaluations in Bihar","authors":"Ravinder Kumar Giri , Binu Cherian , Birendra Mendali , Parminder Virk , Wolfgang Pfeifer , Raj Kumar Jat , Moti Lal Meena , Shubham Durgude , Koushik Banerjee , Mohammad Hasanain , Vijay Singh Meena","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2026.110393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Micronutrient malnutrition (“<em>hidden hunger</em>”) remains a persistent agrifood and public health challenge in South Asia. Although cereal-based diets ensure calorie sufficiency, they frequently fail to meet essential micronutrient requirements, particularly zinc and iron. In the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains (EIGP) of India, Bihar exhibits a high prevalence of anemia, stunting, and underweight populations. Addressing these challenges requires scalable, food-based nutritional interventions that enhance dietary quality without compromising crop productivity, climatic resilience, or farmer incomes.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study tested the hypothesis that zinc-biofortified wheat varieties can simultaneously deliver stable grain yield, enhanced grain zinc and iron concentrations, and broad agro-ecological adaptability under farmer-managed conditions in Bihar.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multi-location field evaluations were conducted over five consecutive wheat-growing seasons (2018–19–2022–23) across all 14 districts of Bihar, covering diverse agro-climatic sub-zones. Two zinc-biofortified wheat varieties (BHU-25 and BHU-31) were compared with a widely cultivated commercial variety (HD-2967). The dataset comprised more than 11,000 plot-level observations generated through HarvestPlus yield trials, strip trials, and farmer-led demonstrations conducted under real-world management practices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across locations and seasons, both biofortified varieties produced grain yields comparable to, or numerically higher than, the commercial check (HD-2967), with mean yields ranging from 3.9 to 4.2 Mg ha⁻¹ . Although BHU-31 recorded a numerically higher mean yield (3.6 %) and BHU-25 a marginal advantage (0.5 %) over HD-2967, these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05), indicating the absence of a yield penalty associated with biofortification. Grain zinc concentrations consistently met or exceeded the biofortification target of 38 mg kg⁻¹ and remained stable across environments, with district means ranging from 26.4 to 40.1 mg kg⁻¹ . Grain iron concentrations showed moderate but significant spatial variation across environments (33.2–40.5 mg kg⁻¹). Importantly, during climatically adverse seasons characterized by excessive rainfall and heat stress, both biofortified varieties maintained yields above 3.0 Mg ha⁻¹ , comparable to the commercial check.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Zinc-biofortified wheat varieties demonstrated a rare combination of high yield potential, enhanced micronutrient density, and climatic resilience under farmer-managed conditions, with no evidence of a yield penalty.</div></div><div><h3>Implications and limitations</h3><div>The findings provide robust field-scale evidence that zinc-biofortified wheat is a cost-effective, climate-resilient, and nutrition-sensitive intervention for cereal-based food systems. Integration of these varieties into public procurement, school feeding programs, and decentralized seed systems offers a scalable pathway to improve dietary zinc intake while sustaining wheat productivity in Bihar and similar agro-ecosystems of South Asia. While the study captures extensive spatial and temporal variability, direct assessments of household consumption and nutritional outcomes were beyond its scope.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"341 ","pages":"Article 110393"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429026000699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context
Micronutrient malnutrition (“hidden hunger”) remains a persistent agrifood and public health challenge in South Asia. Although cereal-based diets ensure calorie sufficiency, they frequently fail to meet essential micronutrient requirements, particularly zinc and iron. In the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains (EIGP) of India, Bihar exhibits a high prevalence of anemia, stunting, and underweight populations. Addressing these challenges requires scalable, food-based nutritional interventions that enhance dietary quality without compromising crop productivity, climatic resilience, or farmer incomes.
Objective
This study tested the hypothesis that zinc-biofortified wheat varieties can simultaneously deliver stable grain yield, enhanced grain zinc and iron concentrations, and broad agro-ecological adaptability under farmer-managed conditions in Bihar.
Methods
Multi-location field evaluations were conducted over five consecutive wheat-growing seasons (2018–19–2022–23) across all 14 districts of Bihar, covering diverse agro-climatic sub-zones. Two zinc-biofortified wheat varieties (BHU-25 and BHU-31) were compared with a widely cultivated commercial variety (HD-2967). The dataset comprised more than 11,000 plot-level observations generated through HarvestPlus yield trials, strip trials, and farmer-led demonstrations conducted under real-world management practices.
Results
Across locations and seasons, both biofortified varieties produced grain yields comparable to, or numerically higher than, the commercial check (HD-2967), with mean yields ranging from 3.9 to 4.2 Mg ha⁻¹ . Although BHU-31 recorded a numerically higher mean yield (3.6 %) and BHU-25 a marginal advantage (0.5 %) over HD-2967, these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05), indicating the absence of a yield penalty associated with biofortification. Grain zinc concentrations consistently met or exceeded the biofortification target of 38 mg kg⁻¹ and remained stable across environments, with district means ranging from 26.4 to 40.1 mg kg⁻¹ . Grain iron concentrations showed moderate but significant spatial variation across environments (33.2–40.5 mg kg⁻¹). Importantly, during climatically adverse seasons characterized by excessive rainfall and heat stress, both biofortified varieties maintained yields above 3.0 Mg ha⁻¹ , comparable to the commercial check.
Conclusions
Zinc-biofortified wheat varieties demonstrated a rare combination of high yield potential, enhanced micronutrient density, and climatic resilience under farmer-managed conditions, with no evidence of a yield penalty.
Implications and limitations
The findings provide robust field-scale evidence that zinc-biofortified wheat is a cost-effective, climate-resilient, and nutrition-sensitive intervention for cereal-based food systems. Integration of these varieties into public procurement, school feeding programs, and decentralized seed systems offers a scalable pathway to improve dietary zinc intake while sustaining wheat productivity in Bihar and similar agro-ecosystems of South Asia. While the study captures extensive spatial and temporal variability, direct assessments of household consumption and nutritional outcomes were beyond its scope.
期刊介绍:
Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on:
√ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels
on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems,
with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.