Scaling biofortified wheat production for agrifood and nutritional security in eastern India: Evidence from five years of multi-location field evaluations in Bihar

IF 7.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Field Crops Research Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2026.110393
Ravinder Kumar Giri , Binu Cherian , Birendra Mendali , Parminder Virk , Wolfgang Pfeifer , Raj Kumar Jat , Moti Lal Meena , Shubham Durgude , Koushik Banerjee , Mohammad Hasanain , Vijay Singh Meena
{"title":"Scaling biofortified wheat production for agrifood and nutritional security in eastern India: Evidence from five years of multi-location field evaluations in Bihar","authors":"Ravinder Kumar Giri ,&nbsp;Binu Cherian ,&nbsp;Birendra Mendali ,&nbsp;Parminder Virk ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Pfeifer ,&nbsp;Raj Kumar Jat ,&nbsp;Moti Lal Meena ,&nbsp;Shubham Durgude ,&nbsp;Koushik Banerjee ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hasanain ,&nbsp;Vijay Singh Meena","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2026.110393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Micronutrient malnutrition (“<em>hidden hunger</em>”) remains a persistent agrifood and public health challenge in South Asia. Although cereal-based diets ensure calorie sufficiency, they frequently fail to meet essential micronutrient requirements, particularly zinc and iron. In the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains (EIGP) of India, Bihar exhibits a high prevalence of anemia, stunting, and underweight populations. Addressing these challenges requires scalable, food-based nutritional interventions that enhance dietary quality without compromising crop productivity, climatic resilience, or farmer incomes.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study tested the hypothesis that zinc-biofortified wheat varieties can simultaneously deliver stable grain yield, enhanced grain zinc and iron concentrations, and broad agro-ecological adaptability under farmer-managed conditions in Bihar.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multi-location field evaluations were conducted over five consecutive wheat-growing seasons (2018–19–2022–23) across all 14 districts of Bihar, covering diverse agro-climatic sub-zones. Two zinc-biofortified wheat varieties (BHU-25 and BHU-31) were compared with a widely cultivated commercial variety (HD-2967). The dataset comprised more than 11,000 plot-level observations generated through HarvestPlus yield trials, strip trials, and farmer-led demonstrations conducted under real-world management practices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across locations and seasons, both biofortified varieties produced grain yields comparable to, or numerically higher than, the commercial check (HD-2967), with mean yields ranging from 3.9 to 4.2 Mg ha⁻¹ . Although BHU-31 recorded a numerically higher mean yield (3.6 %) and BHU-25 a marginal advantage (0.5 %) over HD-2967, these differences were not statistically significant (P &gt; 0.05), indicating the absence of a yield penalty associated with biofortification. Grain zinc concentrations consistently met or exceeded the biofortification target of 38 mg kg⁻¹ and remained stable across environments, with district means ranging from 26.4 to 40.1 mg kg⁻¹ . Grain iron concentrations showed moderate but significant spatial variation across environments (33.2–40.5 mg kg⁻¹). Importantly, during climatically adverse seasons characterized by excessive rainfall and heat stress, both biofortified varieties maintained yields above 3.0 Mg ha⁻¹ , comparable to the commercial check.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Zinc-biofortified wheat varieties demonstrated a rare combination of high yield potential, enhanced micronutrient density, and climatic resilience under farmer-managed conditions, with no evidence of a yield penalty.</div></div><div><h3>Implications and limitations</h3><div>The findings provide robust field-scale evidence that zinc-biofortified wheat is a cost-effective, climate-resilient, and nutrition-sensitive intervention for cereal-based food systems. Integration of these varieties into public procurement, school feeding programs, and decentralized seed systems offers a scalable pathway to improve dietary zinc intake while sustaining wheat productivity in Bihar and similar agro-ecosystems of South Asia. While the study captures extensive spatial and temporal variability, direct assessments of household consumption and nutritional outcomes were beyond its scope.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"341 ","pages":"Article 110393"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429026000699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Micronutrient malnutrition (“hidden hunger”) remains a persistent agrifood and public health challenge in South Asia. Although cereal-based diets ensure calorie sufficiency, they frequently fail to meet essential micronutrient requirements, particularly zinc and iron. In the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains (EIGP) of India, Bihar exhibits a high prevalence of anemia, stunting, and underweight populations. Addressing these challenges requires scalable, food-based nutritional interventions that enhance dietary quality without compromising crop productivity, climatic resilience, or farmer incomes.

Objective

This study tested the hypothesis that zinc-biofortified wheat varieties can simultaneously deliver stable grain yield, enhanced grain zinc and iron concentrations, and broad agro-ecological adaptability under farmer-managed conditions in Bihar.

Methods

Multi-location field evaluations were conducted over five consecutive wheat-growing seasons (2018–19–2022–23) across all 14 districts of Bihar, covering diverse agro-climatic sub-zones. Two zinc-biofortified wheat varieties (BHU-25 and BHU-31) were compared with a widely cultivated commercial variety (HD-2967). The dataset comprised more than 11,000 plot-level observations generated through HarvestPlus yield trials, strip trials, and farmer-led demonstrations conducted under real-world management practices.

Results

Across locations and seasons, both biofortified varieties produced grain yields comparable to, or numerically higher than, the commercial check (HD-2967), with mean yields ranging from 3.9 to 4.2 Mg ha⁻¹ . Although BHU-31 recorded a numerically higher mean yield (3.6 %) and BHU-25 a marginal advantage (0.5 %) over HD-2967, these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05), indicating the absence of a yield penalty associated with biofortification. Grain zinc concentrations consistently met or exceeded the biofortification target of 38 mg kg⁻¹ and remained stable across environments, with district means ranging from 26.4 to 40.1 mg kg⁻¹ . Grain iron concentrations showed moderate but significant spatial variation across environments (33.2–40.5 mg kg⁻¹). Importantly, during climatically adverse seasons characterized by excessive rainfall and heat stress, both biofortified varieties maintained yields above 3.0 Mg ha⁻¹ , comparable to the commercial check.

Conclusions

Zinc-biofortified wheat varieties demonstrated a rare combination of high yield potential, enhanced micronutrient density, and climatic resilience under farmer-managed conditions, with no evidence of a yield penalty.

Implications and limitations

The findings provide robust field-scale evidence that zinc-biofortified wheat is a cost-effective, climate-resilient, and nutrition-sensitive intervention for cereal-based food systems. Integration of these varieties into public procurement, school feeding programs, and decentralized seed systems offers a scalable pathway to improve dietary zinc intake while sustaining wheat productivity in Bihar and similar agro-ecosystems of South Asia. While the study captures extensive spatial and temporal variability, direct assessments of household consumption and nutritional outcomes were beyond its scope.
在印度东部为农业食品和营养安全扩大生物强化小麦生产:来自比哈尔邦5年多地点实地评估的证据
背景微量营养素营养不良(“隐性饥饿”)仍然是南亚农业食品和公共卫生面临的一个长期挑战。虽然以谷物为基础的饮食确保热量充足,但它们往往不能满足基本微量营养素的需求,特别是锌和铁。在印度东部的印度河-恒河平原(EIGP),比哈尔邦贫血、发育迟缓和体重不足的患病率很高。应对这些挑战需要可扩展的、以粮食为基础的营养干预措施,在不影响作物生产力、气候适应能力或农民收入的情况下提高饮食质量。目的本研究验证了在比哈尔邦农民管理条件下,生物强化锌小麦品种能够同时实现稳定的粮食产量、提高粮食锌和铁浓度以及广泛的农业生态适应性的假设。方法在比哈尔邦所有14个区连续5个小麦生长季节(2018-19-2022-23)进行多地点实地评价,涵盖不同的农业气候分区。研究了两个锌生物强化小麦品种(bhi -25和bhi -31)与一个广泛种植的商品品种(HD-2967)的比较。该数据集包括超过11,000个地块观测数据,这些数据来自HarvestPlus产量试验、条块试验和农民主导的实际管理实践示范。结果在不同的地点和季节,两种生物强化品种的粮食产量与商业对照(HD-2967)相当,或者在数字上高于商业对照(HD-2967),平均产量在3.9到4.2 Mg ha¹ 之间。虽然与HD-2967相比,bu -31的平均产量(3.6 %)和bu -25的边际优势(0.5 %)在数值上更高,但这些差异在统计学上不显著(P >; 0.05),表明不存在与生物强化相关的产量损失。粮食锌浓度始终达到或超过38 mg kg⁻¹ 的生物强化目标,并在各个环境中保持稳定,地区平均值从26.4到40.1 mg kg⁻¹ 。颗粒铁浓度在不同环境中表现出中度但显著的空间差异(33.2-40.5 mg kg⁻¹)。重要的是,在以过度降雨和高温胁迫为特征的气候不利季节,两种生物强化品种的产量都保持在3.0 Mg ha -¹ 以上,与商业检查相当。结论:在农民管理的条件下,锌生物强化小麦品种表现出高产潜力、增强微量元素密度和气候适应能力的罕见组合,没有证据表明产量受到影响。研究结果提供了强有力的田间规模证据,证明锌生物强化小麦是一种具有成本效益、气候适应性和营养敏感性的谷物食品系统干预措施。在比哈尔邦和南亚类似的农业生态系统,将这些品种纳入公共采购、学校供餐计划和分散种子系统,为提高膳食锌摄入量,同时维持小麦生产力提供了一条可扩展的途径。虽然这项研究捕捉到了广泛的空间和时间变化,但对家庭消费和营养状况的直接评估超出了其范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书