Evaluating tourism destination images: Integrating survey, neural responses and artificial intelligence

IF 8 2区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Kathrin Jaszus , Anett Erdmann , Jose M. Ramos-Henríquez , Jose M. Mas-Iglesias
{"title":"Evaluating tourism destination images: Integrating survey, neural responses and artificial intelligence","authors":"Kathrin Jaszus ,&nbsp;Anett Erdmann ,&nbsp;Jose M. Ramos-Henríquez ,&nbsp;Jose M. Mas-Iglesias","doi":"10.1016/j.jdmm.2026.101089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study introduces a triple-method approach to evaluate tourism destination attractiveness by integrating consumer surveys, neurophysiological measurements, and large language models (LLMs). Drawing on dual-process theory as a conceptual and interpretive framework, we examine how different measurement methods, individually and in combination, can help explain tourists' preferences for destination images. The study involved 96 participants from two countries who were shown in an experiment ten images representing various tourism types while collecting self-reported data, neurophysiological measurements, and LLM-based image assessments. To analyze image rankings and relative preferences, we adopted a multi-stage analytical approach. Our findings suggest that each measurement method captures distinct aspects of tourist decision-making: Survey measurements primarily correlate with fast-affective responses. Neurophysiological data reveal affective and cognitive responses not detected in self-reports. LLMs offer complementary evaluations. However, the incremental explanatory value of LLM-based assessment varies by image-type. Combined measurements also differ in effectiveness across tourism types, underscoring the need for tailored evaluation approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Destination Marketing & Management","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 101089"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Destination Marketing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212571X26000077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces a triple-method approach to evaluate tourism destination attractiveness by integrating consumer surveys, neurophysiological measurements, and large language models (LLMs). Drawing on dual-process theory as a conceptual and interpretive framework, we examine how different measurement methods, individually and in combination, can help explain tourists' preferences for destination images. The study involved 96 participants from two countries who were shown in an experiment ten images representing various tourism types while collecting self-reported data, neurophysiological measurements, and LLM-based image assessments. To analyze image rankings and relative preferences, we adopted a multi-stage analytical approach. Our findings suggest that each measurement method captures distinct aspects of tourist decision-making: Survey measurements primarily correlate with fast-affective responses. Neurophysiological data reveal affective and cognitive responses not detected in self-reports. LLMs offer complementary evaluations. However, the incremental explanatory value of LLM-based assessment varies by image-type. Combined measurements also differ in effectiveness across tourism types, underscoring the need for tailored evaluation approaches.
旅游目的地形象评价:综合调查、神经反应和人工智能
本研究以消费者调查、神经生理测量和大型语言模型(LLMs)为基础,采用三种方法来评估旅游目的地的吸引力。利用双过程理论作为概念和解释框架,我们研究了不同的测量方法如何单独和组合,可以帮助解释游客对目的地图像的偏好。该研究涉及来自两个国家的96名参与者,在收集自我报告数据、神经生理测量和基于法学硕士的图像评估的同时,向他们展示了代表不同旅游类型的10幅图像。为了分析图像排名和相对偏好,我们采用了多阶段分析方法。我们的研究结果表明,每种测量方法都捕获了游客决策的不同方面:调查测量主要与快速情感反应相关。神经生理学数据揭示了自我报告中未检测到的情感和认知反应。法学硕士提供补充评估。然而,基于llm的评估的增量解释价值因图像类型而异。综合衡量方法在不同旅游类型之间的有效性也有所不同,这突出表明需要有针对性的评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Destination Marketing & Management (JDMM) is an international journal that focuses on the study of tourist destinations, specifically their marketing and management. It aims to provide a critical understanding of all aspects of destination marketing and management, considering their unique contexts in terms of policy, planning, economics, geography, and history. The journal seeks to develop a strong theoretical foundation in this field by incorporating knowledge from various disciplinary approaches. Additionally, JDMM aims to promote critical thinking and innovation in destination marketing and management, expand the boundaries of knowledge, and serve as a platform for international idea exchange.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书