A Realist Evaluation of a Seven Day Community Rehabilitation Unit

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Lisa Murphy, Freda Browne, Helen Toohey, Jennifer Kinsella, Michael Connolly
{"title":"A Realist Evaluation of a Seven Day Community Rehabilitation Unit","authors":"Lisa Murphy, Freda Browne, Helen Toohey, Jennifer Kinsella, Michael Connolly","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf318.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The Community Rehabilitation Unit (CRU) at Our Lady’s Hospice & Care Services is an 18-bed inpatient facility for those aged 65+. The unit bridges the gap between acute care and community living by providing tailored rehabilitation programmes to optimise patient function. Established as a five-day service it expanded to seven days in 2020. Research on community rehabilitation inpatient services for frail older adults is limited internationally. Methods This study set out to investigate how the CRU works for patients and in what circumstances it works best and why? The objectives included developing explanatory theories, identifying perceptions of processes, resources, mechanisms and determining areas for service improvement. Phase1: a literature review, analysis of anonymised data from 200 admissions, 19 internal documents and an Expert Panel (n=7) to develop initial programme theory. Phase 2: testing and refining these theories through stakeholder focus groups/interviews (n=10) and patient interviews (n=4). Phase 3: final theory refinement and approval by the Expert Panel (n=4). Results The primary patient profile were admitted from home (94%) with mobility issues (54%) being the main reason, followed by general rehabilitation (27%). The seven-day service was positively evaluated by stakeholders and patients, although some internal feedback mentioned 'quiet weekends. The seven-day service enabled the admission of more complex patients. The CRU's location and grounds were appreciated. Resources fostered autonomy, while limited bathrooms posed challenges. Socialisation positively impacted patient motivation, as did staff. While rehabilitation focused on patient-set goals, this was not consistently documented in nursing assessments. Conclusion The CRU service was positively received and areas for improvement were identified. Reviewing PAS data to better capture admission details and reasons for admission is recommended. Formalising a philosophy of care, including a nursing-care model, to reflect person-centred, goal-oriented rehabilitation is crucial. Maintaining the seven-day service and enhancing weekend social activities are recommended to reinforce its benefits.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf318.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The Community Rehabilitation Unit (CRU) at Our Lady’s Hospice & Care Services is an 18-bed inpatient facility for those aged 65+. The unit bridges the gap between acute care and community living by providing tailored rehabilitation programmes to optimise patient function. Established as a five-day service it expanded to seven days in 2020. Research on community rehabilitation inpatient services for frail older adults is limited internationally. Methods This study set out to investigate how the CRU works for patients and in what circumstances it works best and why? The objectives included developing explanatory theories, identifying perceptions of processes, resources, mechanisms and determining areas for service improvement. Phase1: a literature review, analysis of anonymised data from 200 admissions, 19 internal documents and an Expert Panel (n=7) to develop initial programme theory. Phase 2: testing and refining these theories through stakeholder focus groups/interviews (n=10) and patient interviews (n=4). Phase 3: final theory refinement and approval by the Expert Panel (n=4). Results The primary patient profile were admitted from home (94%) with mobility issues (54%) being the main reason, followed by general rehabilitation (27%). The seven-day service was positively evaluated by stakeholders and patients, although some internal feedback mentioned 'quiet weekends. The seven-day service enabled the admission of more complex patients. The CRU's location and grounds were appreciated. Resources fostered autonomy, while limited bathrooms posed challenges. Socialisation positively impacted patient motivation, as did staff. While rehabilitation focused on patient-set goals, this was not consistently documented in nursing assessments. Conclusion The CRU service was positively received and areas for improvement were identified. Reviewing PAS data to better capture admission details and reasons for admission is recommended. Formalising a philosophy of care, including a nursing-care model, to reflect person-centred, goal-oriented rehabilitation is crucial. Maintaining the seven-day service and enhancing weekend social activities are recommended to reinforce its benefits.
七天社区康复单位的现实评估
背景圣母安宁疗护服务的社区康复部(CRU)设有18张病床,为65岁以上的长者提供住院服务。该单位通过提供量身定制的康复计划来优化患者功能,弥合了急性护理和社区生活之间的差距。该服务最初为5天,到2020年扩大到7天。国际上对体弱老年人社区康复住院服务的研究有限。本研究旨在探讨CRU是如何对患者起作用的,在什么情况下效果最好,为什么效果最好?目标包括发展解释性理论,确定对程序、资源、机制的看法,并确定服务改进的领域。第一阶段:文献综述,分析来自200名招生人员的匿名数据,19份内部文件和一个专家小组(n=7),以发展初步计划理论。第二阶段:通过利益相关者焦点小组/访谈(n=10)和患者访谈(n=4)来测试和完善这些理论。第三阶段:最后的理论完善和专家小组的批准(n=4)。结果住院患者主要来自家庭(94%),主要原因是活动能力问题(54%),其次是一般康复(27%)。这项为期七天的服务得到了利益相关者和患者的积极评价,尽管一些内部反馈提到了“安静的周末”。为期7天的服务使更复杂的病人得以入院。CRU的位置和场地受到赞赏。资源促进了自主性,而有限的浴室带来了挑战。社会化对患者的动机产生了积极的影响,工作人员也是如此。虽然康复侧重于患者设定的目标,但在护理评估中并没有一致的记录。结论CRU的服务得到了积极的评价,并确定了需要改进的地方。建议审查PAS数据以更好地获取入学细节和入学原因。将护理哲学(包括护理模式)正式化,以反映以人为本、以目标为导向的康复是至关重要的。建议维持七天服务,并加强周末社交活动,以增强其效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书