Testing five-day average ward based BP accuracy by comparing versus inpatient Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring– A ward-based, retrospective cohort study

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Colm Ryan, Mary Doyle, Dan Ryan
{"title":"Testing five-day average ward based BP accuracy by comparing versus inpatient Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring– A ward-based, retrospective cohort study","authors":"Colm Ryan, Mary Doyle, Dan Ryan","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf318.207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Blood pressure (BP) is a highly important inpatient vital sign. However, its variability poses a challenge to the clinician attempting to conclude ward mean and minimum values - often from two readings per day. In this study we compared BP readings from 24-hour ambulatory BP monitors (ABPMs with that of 5 days of twice daily ward based BP readings (WBRs). The aim of the study was to test the accuracy of ward BP in clarifying mean and minimum values. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study, gathering data on inpatients in an off-site rehabilitation unit between April 2023 and October 2024. Included patients had undergone an 24-hour ABPM assessment during their inpatient stay. Chart review was performed to collect data on ABPM, daytime WBRs (five day average, five day minimum), demographics, comorbidities, and clinical frailty score. Univariate analysis compared the relationships between ABPMsand WBRs. Results 72 patients were included; 45 were male (63%), mean age 79.92 years (6.744), mean clinical frailty score 5.056 (0.948). ABPMsdiffered significantly from five-day WBRs. Mean Systolic WBRs differing from ABPMsby an average of 6.4mmHg (p-value 0.03, Pearson 0.79). WBRs overestimated systolic blood pressure in 50 patients (69%), by an average of 12.01mmHg (p-value 0.001, Pearson 0.9). Regarding minimum Systolic BP, WBRs overestimated minimum BP by more than 10mmHg in 35 (49%) patients. Of note 29 (40%) of our cohort reported a history of falls in the last year with comorbid orthostatic hypotension. Conclusion In this frail, frequent-faller group, five-day average ward systolic BP overestimated mean systolic BP by approximately 1 BP tablet (6mmHg). Moreover, in half of patients ward BP overestimated minimum BP by more than 10mmHg. While treating hypertension is an essential component of medical care, more accurate BP assessment tools should be considered to prevent over-zealous treatment of BP in older, frailer inpatients.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf318.207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Blood pressure (BP) is a highly important inpatient vital sign. However, its variability poses a challenge to the clinician attempting to conclude ward mean and minimum values - often from two readings per day. In this study we compared BP readings from 24-hour ambulatory BP monitors (ABPMs with that of 5 days of twice daily ward based BP readings (WBRs). The aim of the study was to test the accuracy of ward BP in clarifying mean and minimum values. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study, gathering data on inpatients in an off-site rehabilitation unit between April 2023 and October 2024. Included patients had undergone an 24-hour ABPM assessment during their inpatient stay. Chart review was performed to collect data on ABPM, daytime WBRs (five day average, five day minimum), demographics, comorbidities, and clinical frailty score. Univariate analysis compared the relationships between ABPMsand WBRs. Results 72 patients were included; 45 were male (63%), mean age 79.92 years (6.744), mean clinical frailty score 5.056 (0.948). ABPMsdiffered significantly from five-day WBRs. Mean Systolic WBRs differing from ABPMsby an average of 6.4mmHg (p-value 0.03, Pearson 0.79). WBRs overestimated systolic blood pressure in 50 patients (69%), by an average of 12.01mmHg (p-value 0.001, Pearson 0.9). Regarding minimum Systolic BP, WBRs overestimated minimum BP by more than 10mmHg in 35 (49%) patients. Of note 29 (40%) of our cohort reported a history of falls in the last year with comorbid orthostatic hypotension. Conclusion In this frail, frequent-faller group, five-day average ward systolic BP overestimated mean systolic BP by approximately 1 BP tablet (6mmHg). Moreover, in half of patients ward BP overestimated minimum BP by more than 10mmHg. While treating hypertension is an essential component of medical care, more accurate BP assessment tools should be considered to prevent over-zealous treatment of BP in older, frailer inpatients.
通过对比住院病人动态血压监测,检测五天平均病房血压的准确性——一项基于病房的回顾性队列研究
背景:血压(BP)是住院病人非常重要的生命体征。然而,它的可变性对临床医生提出了挑战,他们试图得出病房平均值和最小值——通常是每天两次读数。在这项研究中,我们比较了24小时动态血压监测仪(abpm)的血压读数与5天每天两次的病房血压读数(wbr)。本研究的目的是检验ward BP在澄清平均值和最小值方面的准确性。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,收集了2023年4月至2024年10月期间在异地康复病房住院的患者的数据。纳入的患者在住院期间接受了24小时ABPM评估。进行图表回顾,收集ABPM、日间wbr(平均5天,最低5天)、人口统计学、合并症和临床虚弱评分的数据。单因素分析比较了abpms和wbr之间的关系。结果纳入72例患者;男性45例(63%),平均年龄79.92岁(6.744岁),平均临床虚弱评分5.056分(0.948分)。abpm与5天wbr显著不同。平均收缩期wbr与abpms平均相差6.4mmHg (p值0.03,Pearson值0.79)。50例患者(69%)的wbr平均高估了收缩压12.01mmHg (p值0.001,Pearson值0.9)。在最小收缩压方面,35例(49%)患者wbr对最小收缩压的高估超过10mmHg。值得注意的是,我们的队列中有29人(40%)报告了去年的跌倒史,并伴有直立性低血压。结论:在这个虚弱、经常下降的组中,5天平均病房收缩压高估了平均收缩压约1 BP片(6mmHg)。此外,一半患者的血压高估了最低血压超过10mmHg。虽然治疗高血压是医疗保健的重要组成部分,但应考虑使用更准确的血压评估工具,以防止对年老体弱的住院患者过度治疗血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书