{"title":"Stakeholders’ expectations versus standard setters’ outcome about crypto assets accounting: A PLS-SEM analysis","authors":"Adriana Tiron-Tudor, Stefania Mierlita, Cristina Stefanescu","doi":"10.1016/j.accinf.2026.100772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research aims to explore the interplay between stakeholders and the US accounting standard setter on the accounting treatment of crypto assets. We applied the beliefs-actions-outcomes (BAO) model to capture stakeholders’ expectations, expressed in their comment letters in response to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Exposure Draft (FASB’s ED) on Topic 350, and to assess their expectations’ reflection in the revised version of the standard. We analysed the relationship between stakeholders’ beliefs, proposed actions, and the final standard’s outcome using PLS-SEM (partial least squares structural equation modelling) in SmartPLS. Furthermore, we examine whether feedback from the accountancy profession, a significant stakeholder group in this process, acts as a moderator of the belief-action relationship. The results confirm that the beliefs significantly influence the proposed actions but have a minimal impact on the outcome, with a small number of suggestions for improvement being integrated. The involvement of the accountancy profession moderated the relationship between beliefs and actions, only for the scope and measurement categories, reflecting their specialised knowledge and technical expertise. Through empirical results, current research contributes to the debate on crypto asset regulation by examining stakeholders’ expectations and how their participation has influenced this regulatory field, emphasising the standard-setting body’s responsiveness to their input. The study offers theoretical and practical insights into the interplay between stakeholders’ beliefs, their proposed actions, and the development of crypto accounting regulation (the outcome).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47170,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting Information Systems","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 100772"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089526000023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research aims to explore the interplay between stakeholders and the US accounting standard setter on the accounting treatment of crypto assets. We applied the beliefs-actions-outcomes (BAO) model to capture stakeholders’ expectations, expressed in their comment letters in response to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Exposure Draft (FASB’s ED) on Topic 350, and to assess their expectations’ reflection in the revised version of the standard. We analysed the relationship between stakeholders’ beliefs, proposed actions, and the final standard’s outcome using PLS-SEM (partial least squares structural equation modelling) in SmartPLS. Furthermore, we examine whether feedback from the accountancy profession, a significant stakeholder group in this process, acts as a moderator of the belief-action relationship. The results confirm that the beliefs significantly influence the proposed actions but have a minimal impact on the outcome, with a small number of suggestions for improvement being integrated. The involvement of the accountancy profession moderated the relationship between beliefs and actions, only for the scope and measurement categories, reflecting their specialised knowledge and technical expertise. Through empirical results, current research contributes to the debate on crypto asset regulation by examining stakeholders’ expectations and how their participation has influenced this regulatory field, emphasising the standard-setting body’s responsiveness to their input. The study offers theoretical and practical insights into the interplay between stakeholders’ beliefs, their proposed actions, and the development of crypto accounting regulation (the outcome).
本研究旨在探讨利益相关者与美国会计准则制定者在加密资产会计处理方面的相互作用。我们应用信念-行动-结果(BAO)模型来捕捉利益相关者对财务会计准则委员会关于主题350的征求意见稿(FASB ' s ED)的评论信中表达的期望,并评估他们的期望在准则修订版中的反映。我们在SmartPLS中使用PLS-SEM(偏最小二乘结构方程模型)分析了利益相关者的信念、建议的行动和最终标准结果之间的关系。此外,我们研究了来自会计专业的反馈,在这一过程中一个重要的利益相关者群体,是否作为信念-行动关系的调节因子。结果证实,信念对所提议的行动有显著影响,但对结果的影响很小,只有少量的改进建议被整合。会计专业的参与调节了信念与行为之间的关系,仅在范围和测量类别上,反映了他们的专业知识和技术专长。通过实证结果,目前的研究通过检查利益相关者的期望以及他们的参与如何影响这一监管领域,强调标准制定机构对他们的投入的响应,为加密资产监管的辩论做出了贡献。该研究为利益相关者的信念、他们的拟议行动和加密会计监管的发展(结果)之间的相互作用提供了理论和实践见解。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Accounting Information Systems will publish thoughtful, well developed articles that examine the rapidly evolving relationship between accounting and information technology. Articles may range from empirical to analytical, from practice-based to the development of new techniques, but must be related to problems facing the integration of accounting and information technology. The journal will address (but will not limit itself to) the following specific issues: control and auditability of information systems; management of information technology; artificial intelligence research in accounting; development issues in accounting and information systems; human factors issues related to information technology; development of theories related to information technology; methodological issues in information technology research; information systems validation; human–computer interaction research in accounting information systems. The journal welcomes and encourages articles from both practitioners and academicians.