Mind The Weekend Gap: Handover Challenges In Older Patient Care In A Model Three Hospital

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Joshua Ramjohn, Hailey Sledge, Talal Zahid, Ednilson Lang Kim Tao, David O'Loughlin, Tiago Mendes
{"title":"Mind The Weekend Gap: Handover Challenges In Older Patient Care In A Model Three Hospital","authors":"Joshua Ramjohn, Hailey Sledge, Talal Zahid, Ednilson Lang Kim Tao, David O'Loughlin, Tiago Mendes","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf318.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Clinical handover in geriatric medicine is particularly challenging due to the multifaceted needs of older patients, complex decision-making, and the importance of continuity across care transitions. In many Irish Model Three Hospitals, the current system – where on-call teams facilitate weekend inpatient reviews – introduces further challenges for safe handover. Handwritten weekend review proformas are commonly utilised, though their content may not consistently meet comprehensive handover standards as outlined by the Health Service Executive (HSE). This study audited the content of weekend handover proformas in a Model Three Hospital, against the HSE-recommended handover criteria. Methods A retrospective review of 90 weekend handover proformas was conducted over a two month period, assessing compliance with recognised HSE safe handover standards. Results The mean age of patients listed for weekend review was 74 years. Three patient identifiers were documented in 87% of proformas, while 8% lacked any identifiers. The nature of the requested review was specified in 76% of cases, with combined review of blood results and clinical assessment being the most frequently requested review modality (63%). A proposed management plan was documented in 63% of proformas, and outstanding tasks were noted in 51%. A treatment escalation plan was included in only 25% of entries, and resuscitation status was recorded in 24%. Notably, none of the proformas included triage categorisation, prioritisation, or urgency levels. Conclusion This audit highlights deficits in weekend handover communication within an acute Model Three hospital, particularly impacting older adults. Such deficiencies may contribute to adverse events, suboptimal outcomes and prolonged hospitalisation. We propose implementing a digital, standardised handover tool, incorporating HSE-recommended criteria to support structured, accurate and efficient clinical communication. This aligns with best practice, enhances patient safety and continuity of care through addressing the specific needs of the older inpatient population, while promoting environmental sustainability by reducing reliance on printed proformas.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf318.206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Clinical handover in geriatric medicine is particularly challenging due to the multifaceted needs of older patients, complex decision-making, and the importance of continuity across care transitions. In many Irish Model Three Hospitals, the current system – where on-call teams facilitate weekend inpatient reviews – introduces further challenges for safe handover. Handwritten weekend review proformas are commonly utilised, though their content may not consistently meet comprehensive handover standards as outlined by the Health Service Executive (HSE). This study audited the content of weekend handover proformas in a Model Three Hospital, against the HSE-recommended handover criteria. Methods A retrospective review of 90 weekend handover proformas was conducted over a two month period, assessing compliance with recognised HSE safe handover standards. Results The mean age of patients listed for weekend review was 74 years. Three patient identifiers were documented in 87% of proformas, while 8% lacked any identifiers. The nature of the requested review was specified in 76% of cases, with combined review of blood results and clinical assessment being the most frequently requested review modality (63%). A proposed management plan was documented in 63% of proformas, and outstanding tasks were noted in 51%. A treatment escalation plan was included in only 25% of entries, and resuscitation status was recorded in 24%. Notably, none of the proformas included triage categorisation, prioritisation, or urgency levels. Conclusion This audit highlights deficits in weekend handover communication within an acute Model Three hospital, particularly impacting older adults. Such deficiencies may contribute to adverse events, suboptimal outcomes and prolonged hospitalisation. We propose implementing a digital, standardised handover tool, incorporating HSE-recommended criteria to support structured, accurate and efficient clinical communication. This aligns with best practice, enhances patient safety and continuity of care through addressing the specific needs of the older inpatient population, while promoting environmental sustainability by reducing reliance on printed proformas.
注意周末间隙:三级医院老年病人护理的交接挑战
由于老年患者多方面的需求、复杂的决策以及在护理过渡期间保持连续性的重要性,老年医学的临床交接尤其具有挑战性。在许多爱尔兰三级医院中,目前的系统——随叫随到的团队为周末住院病人复查提供便利——为安全移交带来了进一步的挑战。手写的周末审查形式通常被使用,尽管其内容可能不始终符合卫生服务执行局(HSE)概述的全面移交标准。本研究参照hse推荐的交接标准,对某三甲医院的周末交接形式内容进行审核。方法对90份周末交接表格进行回顾性分析,评估其是否符合公认的HSE安全交接标准。结果周末复查的患者平均年龄为74岁。87%的形式文件中记录了三个患者标识符,而8%的形式文件中没有任何标识符。在76%的病例中指定了所要求的审查的性质,其中血液结果和临床评估的联合审查是最常见的审查方式(63%)。63%的形式报表记录了拟议的管理计划,51%的形式报表记录了未完成的任务。只有25%的条目包含了治疗升级计划,24%的条目记录了复苏状态。值得注意的是,没有一个形式包括分类、优先级或紧急级别。结论:本次审计突出了一家急性三级医院在周末交接沟通方面的缺陷,尤其是对老年人的影响。这些缺陷可能导致不良事件、次优结果和延长住院时间。我们建议采用数字化、标准化的交接工具,结合hse推荐的标准,以支持结构化、准确和高效的临床沟通。这符合最佳实践,通过解决老年住院患者的特殊需求,提高患者安全和护理的连续性,同时通过减少对印刷形式的依赖,促进环境的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书