Comparing the Impact of Metoclopramide versus Ondansetron on Pain Reduction Caused by Etomidate Injection in Patients under General Anesthesia.

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Advanced biomedical research Pub Date : 2025-12-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/abr.abr_131_23
Zahra Rahimi, Behzad Nazemroaya, Mehrdad Masoudifar, Nazanin Nazari
{"title":"Comparing the Impact of Metoclopramide versus Ondansetron on Pain Reduction Caused by Etomidate Injection in Patients under General Anesthesia.","authors":"Zahra Rahimi, Behzad Nazemroaya, Mehrdad Masoudifar, Nazanin Nazari","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_131_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Etomidate is a short-acting intravenous anesthetic commonly used for induction of general anesthesia and sedation. Preventing pain caused by etomidate injection can improve patient comfort and broaden its clinical use. This study compared the effects of metoclopramide and ondansetron on etomidate injection-related pain in patients undergoing general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial conducted at Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, from 2021 to 2022, 90 patients were randomly assigned to three groups (<i>n</i> = 30 each): metoclopramide (Group A), ondansetron (Group B), and normal saline (Group C, control). After drug administration, 0.3 mg etomidate was injected, followed by 1 mL of 2% lidocaine. Pain intensity during etomidate injection was recorded. Hemodynamic parameters-including blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO₂)-were measured at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes, and upon discharge from recovery. Duration of surgery and recovery were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group exhibited a higher mean pain score than the intervention groups. Pain intensity differed significantly between the metoclopramide and control groups (<i>P</i> = 0.001), but not between ondansetron and control (<i>P</i> = 0.762) or between metoclopramide and ondansetron (<i>P</i> = 0.675). Both metoclopramide and ondansetron effectively reduced etomidate injection pain without significant differences in hemodynamic stability or recovery duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both metoclopramide and ondansetron attenuate pain associated with etomidate injection during induction of general anesthesia, with no clear superiority of one drug over the other. Their comparable efficacy supports either as an appropriate option for preventing etomidate-related pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":94292,"journal":{"name":"Advanced biomedical research","volume":"14 ","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12885201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_131_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Etomidate is a short-acting intravenous anesthetic commonly used for induction of general anesthesia and sedation. Preventing pain caused by etomidate injection can improve patient comfort and broaden its clinical use. This study compared the effects of metoclopramide and ondansetron on etomidate injection-related pain in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Materials and methods: In this randomized clinical trial conducted at Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, from 2021 to 2022, 90 patients were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 30 each): metoclopramide (Group A), ondansetron (Group B), and normal saline (Group C, control). After drug administration, 0.3 mg etomidate was injected, followed by 1 mL of 2% lidocaine. Pain intensity during etomidate injection was recorded. Hemodynamic parameters-including blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO₂)-were measured at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes, and upon discharge from recovery. Duration of surgery and recovery were also documented.

Results: The control group exhibited a higher mean pain score than the intervention groups. Pain intensity differed significantly between the metoclopramide and control groups (P = 0.001), but not between ondansetron and control (P = 0.762) or between metoclopramide and ondansetron (P = 0.675). Both metoclopramide and ondansetron effectively reduced etomidate injection pain without significant differences in hemodynamic stability or recovery duration.

Conclusion: Both metoclopramide and ondansetron attenuate pain associated with etomidate injection during induction of general anesthesia, with no clear superiority of one drug over the other. Their comparable efficacy supports either as an appropriate option for preventing etomidate-related pain.

Abstract Image

甲氧氯普胺与昂丹司琼对全身麻醉下依托咪酯注射液止痛效果的比较。
背景:依托咪酯是一种短效静脉麻醉药,常用于全麻诱导和镇静。预防依托咪酯注射引起的疼痛,可以提高患者的舒适度,扩大其临床应用。本研究比较了甲氧氯普胺和昂丹西琼对全身麻醉患者依托咪酯注射相关疼痛的影响。材料与方法:本随机临床试验于2021 - 2022年在伊斯法罕Al-Zahra医院进行,90例患者随机分为三组(n = 30):甲氧氯普胺(A组)、昂丹西琼(B组)和生理盐水(C组,对照组)。给药后,静脉注射依托咪酯0.3 mg, 2%利多卡因1 mL。记录注射依托咪酯时疼痛强度。在5、10、15、30、45和60分钟以及恢复出院时测量血液动力学参数,包括血压、心率和动脉氧饱和度(SaO 2)。同时记录手术时间和恢复情况。结果:对照组疼痛评分高于干预组。甲氧氯普胺组与对照组疼痛强度差异有统计学意义(P = 0.001),但昂丹司琼组与对照组疼痛强度差异无统计学意义(P = 0.762),甲氧氯普胺组与昂丹司琼组疼痛强度差异无统计学意义(P = 0.675)。甲氧氯普胺和昂丹司琼均能有效减轻依托咪酯注射疼痛,在血流动力学稳定性和恢复时间方面无显著差异。结论:甲氧氯普胺和昂丹西琼均能减轻全身麻醉诱导时依托咪酯注射引起的疼痛,两者之间没有明显的优势。它们的相当疗效支持作为预防依托咪酯相关疼痛的适当选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书