Building evidence for transfusion practice: A pilot study on bacterial adhesion and growth in red blood cell infusion sets.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI:10.1111/trf.70104
Zoya Versey, Yuntong Kou, Paula van Vliet, Donna L Ledingham, Sandra Ramirez-Arcos
{"title":"Building evidence for transfusion practice: A pilot study on bacterial adhesion and growth in red blood cell infusion sets.","authors":"Zoya Versey, Yuntong Kou, Paula van Vliet, Donna L Ledingham, Sandra Ramirez-Arcos","doi":"10.1111/trf.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood administration sets are changed after a prescribed time interval with variations in guidelines. In Canada, sets are changed every 4 h based on the theory of potential bacterial attachment. This study aimed to investigate whether bacteria adhere to the inner surfaces of blood administration sets during mimicked transfusions of red blood cell concentrates (RBCCs).</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Serratia marcescens was used to test bacterial adhesion on a Primary PLUM Y-type Blood Set. Study phases (N ≥ 3): (i) RBCCs spiked with 10 CFU/mL and bacterial recovery after 4 h; (ii) and (iii) RBCCs spiked with 1 CFU/mL and bacterial recovery after 2 h (ii) and after 2 h and 24 h (iii); (iv) RBCCs inoculated with 0.1 CFU/mL and bacterial detection at 2-24 h. Bacterial adhesion was verified with dislodging, cultures, and scanning electron microscopy after completion of mimicked RBCC transfusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 10 CFU/mL, S. marcescens was recovered in one of three assays; however, at 1 CFU/mL, bacterial recovery after 2 h was minimal (one of six assays), although proliferation at 24 h was significant. With initial loads of 0.1 CFU/mL, bacteria were only detected at 8 and 24 h, and in the filter, in one of five trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot report provides evidence of bacterial growth in transfusion sets. Data obtained with S. marcescens indicate that the use of blood administration sets could be extended from 4 to ≥6 h after the infusion of the first RBCC with no impact on patient safety. These findings align with existing guidelines endorsing a longer interval between changes of blood product administration sets.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"689-699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13049246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood administration sets are changed after a prescribed time interval with variations in guidelines. In Canada, sets are changed every 4 h based on the theory of potential bacterial attachment. This study aimed to investigate whether bacteria adhere to the inner surfaces of blood administration sets during mimicked transfusions of red blood cell concentrates (RBCCs).

Study design and methods: Serratia marcescens was used to test bacterial adhesion on a Primary PLUM Y-type Blood Set. Study phases (N ≥ 3): (i) RBCCs spiked with 10 CFU/mL and bacterial recovery after 4 h; (ii) and (iii) RBCCs spiked with 1 CFU/mL and bacterial recovery after 2 h (ii) and after 2 h and 24 h (iii); (iv) RBCCs inoculated with 0.1 CFU/mL and bacterial detection at 2-24 h. Bacterial adhesion was verified with dislodging, cultures, and scanning electron microscopy after completion of mimicked RBCC transfusions.

Results: At 10 CFU/mL, S. marcescens was recovered in one of three assays; however, at 1 CFU/mL, bacterial recovery after 2 h was minimal (one of six assays), although proliferation at 24 h was significant. With initial loads of 0.1 CFU/mL, bacteria were only detected at 8 and 24 h, and in the filter, in one of five trials.

Conclusion: This pilot report provides evidence of bacterial growth in transfusion sets. Data obtained with S. marcescens indicate that the use of blood administration sets could be extended from 4 to ≥6 h after the infusion of the first RBCC with no impact on patient safety. These findings align with existing guidelines endorsing a longer interval between changes of blood product administration sets.

为输血实践建立证据:红细胞输液器中细菌粘附和生长的初步研究。
背景:血液管理设置在规定的时间间隔后随着指南的变化而改变。在加拿大,根据潜在细菌附着的理论,每4小时更换一次。本研究旨在探讨在模拟输注红细胞浓缩物(RBCCs)过程中细菌是否粘附在血液给药组的内表面。研究设计和方法:采用粘质沙雷氏菌检测Primary PLUM y型血组的细菌粘附。研究阶段(N≥3):(i) rbcc加标10 CFU/mL, 4 h后细菌回收率;(ii)和(iii) rbcc加标1 CFU/mL, 2 h (ii)、2 h和24 h (iii)后细菌回收率;(iv)接种0.1 CFU/mL的红细胞,2-24 h进行细菌检测。在完成模拟红细胞cc输注后,通过移位、培养和扫描电镜验证细菌粘附。结果:当浓度为10 CFU/mL时,三种方法中有一种都能回收到粘多糖;然而,当浓度为1 CFU/mL时,细菌在2小时后的恢复是最小的(六项试验中的一项),尽管在24小时的增殖是显著的。当初始负荷为0.1 CFU/mL时,仅在8和24 h时检测到细菌,并且在过滤器中,在五次试验中有一次。结论:该试点报告提供了输血组细菌生长的证据。用S. marcescens获得的数据表明,在输注第一个红细胞cc后,血药组的使用时间可以从4小时延长到≥6小时,对患者安全没有影响。这些发现与现有的指南一致,支持在血液制品给药组的改变之间延长间隔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书