Expert Consensus on Ethical Governance for Clinical Applications of Generative Medical Artificial Intelligence(2025 Edition).

Q4 Medicine
Meng-Chun Gong, Yong-Hui Ma, Hui Pan, Hua Bai, Hui Dai, Wei Chen, Hui Liu, Kai Gong, Zhi-Rong Zeng, Hao Wu, Yun Zhou, Zi-Hao Ouyang, Yan Luo, Bo-Han Zhang, Jun-Rong Liu, Xun-Ming Ji
{"title":"Expert Consensus on Ethical Governance for Clinical Applications of Generative Medical Artificial Intelligence(2025 Edition).","authors":"Meng-Chun Gong, Yong-Hui Ma, Hui Pan, Hua Bai, Hui Dai, Wei Chen, Hui Liu, Kai Gong, Zhi-Rong Zeng, Hao Wu, Yun Zhou, Zi-Hao Ouyang, Yan Luo, Bo-Han Zhang, Jun-Rong Liu, Xun-Ming Ji","doi":"10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.17220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The research and innovative applications of generative medical artificial intelligence(GMAI)are rapidly advancing in the healthcare field.Significant breakthroughs of GMAI have been achieved in areas such as generating diagnostic suggestions,optimizing treatment plans,and assisting doctor-patient communication,profoundly reshaping the paradigm of clinical diagnosis and treatment.However,the open-ended nature of GMAI's generation raises novel ethical challenges,including algorithmic bias,ambiguous accountability,data privacy breaches,and insufficient cultural adaptability.Current ethical governance lags behind technological implementation,necessitating the establishment of a standardized governance framework.Our research team assembled a multidisciplinary panel of experts spanning medical ethics,clinical medicine,medical artificial intelligence,hospital management,public health,and law.According to the governance logic of \"prevention-control-remediation\" and integrating international norms with domestic policies,this consensus was developed through two rounds of expert consultation to unify opinions and perspectives.It aims to provide a reference for the specific practice of clinical ethical review in the research and clinical application of GMAI and to establish an authoritative guidance framework for the clinical ethical governance of GMAI,tailored to China's cultural context and national requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":6919,"journal":{"name":"中国医学科学院学报","volume":" ","pages":"24-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医学科学院学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.17220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research and innovative applications of generative medical artificial intelligence(GMAI)are rapidly advancing in the healthcare field.Significant breakthroughs of GMAI have been achieved in areas such as generating diagnostic suggestions,optimizing treatment plans,and assisting doctor-patient communication,profoundly reshaping the paradigm of clinical diagnosis and treatment.However,the open-ended nature of GMAI's generation raises novel ethical challenges,including algorithmic bias,ambiguous accountability,data privacy breaches,and insufficient cultural adaptability.Current ethical governance lags behind technological implementation,necessitating the establishment of a standardized governance framework.Our research team assembled a multidisciplinary panel of experts spanning medical ethics,clinical medicine,medical artificial intelligence,hospital management,public health,and law.According to the governance logic of "prevention-control-remediation" and integrating international norms with domestic policies,this consensus was developed through two rounds of expert consultation to unify opinions and perspectives.It aims to provide a reference for the specific practice of clinical ethical review in the research and clinical application of GMAI and to establish an authoritative guidance framework for the clinical ethical governance of GMAI,tailored to China's cultural context and national requirements.

生成医学人工智能临床应用伦理治理专家共识(2025年版)。
生成式医疗人工智能(GMAI)在医疗领域的研究和创新应用正在迅速推进。GMAI在生成诊断建议、优化治疗方案、辅助医患沟通等方面取得重大突破,深刻重塑了临床诊疗范式。然而,GMAI一代的开放性提出了新的伦理挑战,包括算法偏见、模糊的问责制、数据隐私泄露和文化适应性不足。目前的伦理治理滞后于技术实施,需要建立规范的治理框架。我们的研究团队组建了一个多学科专家小组,涵盖医学伦理学、临床医学、医疗人工智能、医院管理、公共卫生和法律。根据“预防-控制-补救”的治理逻辑,将国际规范与国内政策相结合,通过两轮专家咨询,统一意见和观点,形成了这一共识。旨在为GMAI研究和临床应用中临床伦理审查的具体实践提供参考,为GMAI临床伦理治理建立一个符合中国文化背景和国家要求的权威指导框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国医学科学院学报
中国医学科学院学报 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6813
期刊介绍: Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae was founded in February 1979. It is a comprehensive medical academic journal published in China and abroad, supervised by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China and sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. The journal mainly reports the latest research results, work progress and dynamics in the fields of basic medicine, clinical medicine, pharmacy, preventive medicine, biomedicine, medical teaching and research, aiming to promote the exchange of medical information and improve the academic level of medicine. At present, the journal has been included in 10 famous foreign retrieval systems and their databases [Medline (PubMed online version), Elsevier, EMBASE, CA, WPRIM, ExtraMED, IC, JST, UPD and EBSCO-ASP]; and has been included in important domestic retrieval systems and databases [China Science Citation Database (Documentation and Information Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences), China Core Journals Overview (Peking University Library), China Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Database (China Science and Technology Core Journals) (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information), China Science and Technology Journal Paper and Citation Database (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书