Direct evidence of inter-target response competition for limited resources in attentional blink

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Liang Xu , Zong Meng , Qi Chen , Antao Chen
{"title":"Direct evidence of inter-target response competition for limited resources in attentional blink","authors":"Liang Xu ,&nbsp;Zong Meng ,&nbsp;Qi Chen ,&nbsp;Antao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2026.113338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In everyday life, we sometimes fail to notice a second event if it follows too closely after another—this phenomenon, known as the attentional blink (AB), reveals inherent limits in our ability to process rapid streams of information. The AB is characterized by an impairment in accurately identifying a second target (T2), presented after a first target (T1) within a 200–500 ms window amid a rapid sequence of distractors. It has been widely theorized that the AB results from constraints on late-stage processing. Building on the classic AB paradigm, we manipulated response congruency between T1 and T2 to examine whether the response selection of T2 is constrained during the AB period. We recruited 31 participants and recorded electroencephalography (EEG) data throughout the experiment. The results indicated that congruent responses between the targets significantly improved T1 and T2 accuracy and attenuated the AB magnitude. EEG analysis revealed that incongruent responses, as opposed to congruent ones, led to different patterns in the late stage of T2 processing and were associated with larger P3b amplitudes for T2 recognition. Multivariate pattern analysis also showed the response congruency could be distinguished during the late stage of T2 processing. Notably, these effects were specifically observed within the AB time window and were absent outside this interval. These results suggest that targets vie for the limited late-stage processing resources during the AB period. However, congruence in responses among targets reduces this competitive demand, thereby mitigating the effects of the AB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 113338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876026000206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In everyday life, we sometimes fail to notice a second event if it follows too closely after another—this phenomenon, known as the attentional blink (AB), reveals inherent limits in our ability to process rapid streams of information. The AB is characterized by an impairment in accurately identifying a second target (T2), presented after a first target (T1) within a 200–500 ms window amid a rapid sequence of distractors. It has been widely theorized that the AB results from constraints on late-stage processing. Building on the classic AB paradigm, we manipulated response congruency between T1 and T2 to examine whether the response selection of T2 is constrained during the AB period. We recruited 31 participants and recorded electroencephalography (EEG) data throughout the experiment. The results indicated that congruent responses between the targets significantly improved T1 and T2 accuracy and attenuated the AB magnitude. EEG analysis revealed that incongruent responses, as opposed to congruent ones, led to different patterns in the late stage of T2 processing and were associated with larger P3b amplitudes for T2 recognition. Multivariate pattern analysis also showed the response congruency could be distinguished during the late stage of T2 processing. Notably, these effects were specifically observed within the AB time window and were absent outside this interval. These results suggest that targets vie for the limited late-stage processing resources during the AB period. However, congruence in responses among targets reduces this competitive demand, thereby mitigating the effects of the AB.
注意眨眼中有限资源的目标间反应竞争的直接证据
在日常生活中,如果一件事紧跟在另一件事之后,我们有时会注意不到第二件事——这种现象被称为注意力眨眼(attention blink,简称AB),它揭示了我们处理快速信息流的能力固有的局限性。AB的特征是在快速的干扰物序列中,在第一个目标(T1)出现后,在200-500 ms窗口内出现准确识别第二个目标(T2)的障碍。广泛的理论认为,AB是由后期加工的约束引起的。在经典AB范式的基础上,我们对T1和T2之间的反应一致性进行了操作,以检验T2在AB期间的反应选择是否受到约束。我们招募了31名参与者,并在整个实验过程中记录了脑电图(EEG)数据。结果表明,目标之间的一致性反应显著提高了T1和T2的准确性,并减弱了AB的强度。脑电图分析显示,与一致的反应相比,不一致的反应导致T2加工后期的模式不同,并且与T2识别的P3b振幅较大有关。多变量模式分析也表明,在T2加工后期,反应一致性显著。值得注意的是,这些影响在AB时间窗内特别观察到,而在此时间窗之外则不存在。这些结果表明,在AB期间,目标争夺有限的后期加工资源。然而,目标之间反应的一致性降低了这种竞争性需求,从而减轻了AB的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas: • Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies. • Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes. • Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration. • Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书