Optimization of ultrasound-assisted dehulling for quinoa and comparison with conventional methods: Dehulling performance and physicochemical characterization

IF 6.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Hongbin Bai, Yingsi Wu, Fei Liu, Dezheng Xuan, Xuan Zhao, Wenxue Dong, Xiang Kong, Anbin Zhang
{"title":"Optimization of ultrasound-assisted dehulling for quinoa and comparison with conventional methods: Dehulling performance and physicochemical characterization","authors":"Hongbin Bai,&nbsp;Yingsi Wu,&nbsp;Fei Liu,&nbsp;Dezheng Xuan,&nbsp;Xuan Zhao,&nbsp;Wenxue Dong,&nbsp;Xiang Kong,&nbsp;Anbin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ifset.2026.104475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dehulling is an essential step in the post-harvest processing of quinoa. To address the limitations of conventional dehulling methods, including low processing efficiency, severe grain damage, nutrient loss, and environmental pollution, this study developed a novel ultrasound-assisted wet dehulling (UWD) method as an effective alternative. The feasibility of UWD for quinoa dehulling was investigated by examining the effects of processing time (20–60 min), processing temperature (20–60 °C), and liquid-to-material ratio (3–11 mL/g) on dehulling performance. The results indicated that the optimal processing conditions were 38 min, 40 °C, and 7.2 mL/g, achieving a dehulling rate of 84.74% with a grain damage rate of only 1.22%. Comparative studies between optimized UWD and conventional dry dehulling (DD), wet dehulling (WD), and mixed dehulling (MD) demonstrated that UWD achieved a better balance between dehulling efficiency and grain integrity, with a dehulling rate second only to MD (87.21%) and a damage rate slightly higher than WD (0.93%). For physicochemical characteristics, UWD exhibited the most favorable overall performance, with loss rates of protein, fat, starch, and dietary fiber ranging from 5.31% to 23.76%. The loss rates of macro-elements (K, Mg, P, Ca) and micro-elements (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Co) ranged from 9.58% to 39.87%. Additionally, UWD-treated grains exhibited a cleaner and brighter appearance (L* = 77.12, a* = 4.36, b* = 20.75). Principal component analysis ranked the overall scores as: UWD &gt; MD &gt; WD &gt; DD. The research results provide theoretical basis and technical support for new quinoa dehulling processing technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":329,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 104475"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466856426000433","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dehulling is an essential step in the post-harvest processing of quinoa. To address the limitations of conventional dehulling methods, including low processing efficiency, severe grain damage, nutrient loss, and environmental pollution, this study developed a novel ultrasound-assisted wet dehulling (UWD) method as an effective alternative. The feasibility of UWD for quinoa dehulling was investigated by examining the effects of processing time (20–60 min), processing temperature (20–60 °C), and liquid-to-material ratio (3–11 mL/g) on dehulling performance. The results indicated that the optimal processing conditions were 38 min, 40 °C, and 7.2 mL/g, achieving a dehulling rate of 84.74% with a grain damage rate of only 1.22%. Comparative studies between optimized UWD and conventional dry dehulling (DD), wet dehulling (WD), and mixed dehulling (MD) demonstrated that UWD achieved a better balance between dehulling efficiency and grain integrity, with a dehulling rate second only to MD (87.21%) and a damage rate slightly higher than WD (0.93%). For physicochemical characteristics, UWD exhibited the most favorable overall performance, with loss rates of protein, fat, starch, and dietary fiber ranging from 5.31% to 23.76%. The loss rates of macro-elements (K, Mg, P, Ca) and micro-elements (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Co) ranged from 9.58% to 39.87%. Additionally, UWD-treated grains exhibited a cleaner and brighter appearance (L* = 77.12, a* = 4.36, b* = 20.75). Principal component analysis ranked the overall scores as: UWD > MD > WD > DD. The research results provide theoretical basis and technical support for new quinoa dehulling processing technology.
藜麦超声辅助脱壳工艺的优化及与常规脱壳方法的比较:脱壳性能及理化性质
剥壳是藜麦收获后加工的重要步骤。针对传统脱壳方法加工效率低、籽粒损伤严重、营养损失大、环境污染严重等缺点,本研究提出了一种超声辅助湿法脱壳(UWD)方法。通过考察加工时间(20 ~ 60 min)、加工温度(20 ~ 60℃)和液料比(3 ~ 11 mL/g)对藜麦脱壳性能的影响,探讨了UWD脱壳的可行性。结果表明,最佳工艺条件为38 min、40℃、7.2 mL/g,脱壳率为84.74%,晶粒损伤率仅为1.22%。与常规干式脱壳(DD)、湿式脱壳(WD)和混合脱壳(MD)的对比研究表明,优化后的UWD在脱壳效率和籽粒完整性之间取得了更好的平衡,脱壳率仅次于MD(87.21%),损伤率略高于WD(0.93%)。理化性状方面,UWD表现出最优的综合性能,蛋白质、脂肪、淀粉和膳食纤维的损失率在5.31% ~ 23.76%之间。常量元素(K、Mg、P、Ca)和微量元素(Fe、Zn、Mn、Cu、Co)的损失率在9.58% ~ 39.87%之间。此外,uwd处理后的晶粒更干净、更明亮(L* = 77.12, a* = 4.36, b* = 20.75)。主成分分析综合得分为:UWD >; MD > WD >; DD。研究结果为藜麦脱壳加工新工艺提供理论依据和技术支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
259
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies (IFSET) aims to provide the highest quality original contributions and few, mainly upon invitation, reviews on and highly innovative developments in food science and emerging food process technologies. The significance of the results either for the science community or for industrial R&D groups must be specified. Papers submitted must be of highest scientific quality and only those advancing current scientific knowledge and understanding or with technical relevance will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书