Addressing health inequities in treating neuropathic pain: a scoping review of cognitive behavioral therapies, mindfulness, and meditation-based interventions.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Robert Buren, Matteo Ponzano, Nathan T Adams, Jane Jun, Kathleen A Martin Ginis
{"title":"Addressing health inequities in treating neuropathic pain: a scoping review of cognitive behavioral therapies, mindfulness, and meditation-based interventions.","authors":"Robert Buren, Matteo Ponzano, Nathan T Adams, Jane Jun, Kathleen A Martin Ginis","doi":"10.1093/epirev/mxag002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide and chronic neuropathic pain (NP) disproportionately affects individuals with unmet health care needs, especially those facing health inequities. This scoping review addresses 3 research questions: (1) What are the characteristics and outcomes of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), mindfulness, and meditation-based intervention studies designed to manage NP? (2) Do these intervention studies include participants from populations experiencing health inequities? (3) Are the interventions customized to meet the needs of people experiencing health inequities? Ten databases were searched for studies focused on the search terms \"cognitive behavioral therapy,\" \"CBT,\" \"mindfulness meditation,\" \"and neuropathic pain.\" In total, 1732 abstracts were screened and a total of 24 articles from 22 original studies were included. The primary characteristics of the studies showed that 99% of participants had NP attributable to diabetes, cancer, or spinal cord injury. Outcomes were consistent with previous reviews, demonstrating promise for CBT, mindfulness, and meditation-based therapies in relieving NP. However, demographics were poorly reported, and there was little diversity among participants. Individuals from groups experiencing health inequities were largely unrepresented. Although 55% of studies tailored intervention materials and provided content to support long-term practice, few included long-term follow-up to evaluate sustained impact. In general, research on this topic has fallen short in including and addressing the needs of people experiencing health inequities. Future research should prioritize broader participant inclusion criteria, involve individuals with lived experience in intervention design and delivery, and conduct long-term follow-up to enhance the accessibility, relevance, and sustainability of NP interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50510,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13089449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxag002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide and chronic neuropathic pain (NP) disproportionately affects individuals with unmet health care needs, especially those facing health inequities. This scoping review addresses 3 research questions: (1) What are the characteristics and outcomes of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), mindfulness, and meditation-based intervention studies designed to manage NP? (2) Do these intervention studies include participants from populations experiencing health inequities? (3) Are the interventions customized to meet the needs of people experiencing health inequities? Ten databases were searched for studies focused on the search terms "cognitive behavioral therapy," "CBT," "mindfulness meditation," "and neuropathic pain." In total, 1732 abstracts were screened and a total of 24 articles from 22 original studies were included. The primary characteristics of the studies showed that 99% of participants had NP attributable to diabetes, cancer, or spinal cord injury. Outcomes were consistent with previous reviews, demonstrating promise for CBT, mindfulness, and meditation-based therapies in relieving NP. However, demographics were poorly reported, and there was little diversity among participants. Individuals from groups experiencing health inequities were largely unrepresented. Although 55% of studies tailored intervention materials and provided content to support long-term practice, few included long-term follow-up to evaluate sustained impact. In general, research on this topic has fallen short in including and addressing the needs of people experiencing health inequities. Future research should prioritize broader participant inclusion criteria, involve individuals with lived experience in intervention design and delivery, and conduct long-term follow-up to enhance the accessibility, relevance, and sustainability of NP interventions.

解决治疗神经性疼痛的健康不公平:认知行为疗法,正念和冥想干预的范围审查。
慢性疼痛是世界范围内致残的主要原因,慢性神经性疼痛(NP)不成比例地影响着未满足医疗保健需求的个体,特别是那些面临卫生不平等的个体。本综述涉及三个研究问题:(1)设计用于治疗NP的认知行为疗法(CBT)、正念和冥想干预研究的特点和结果是什么?(2)这些干预研究是否包括来自健康不平等人群的参与者?(3)干预措施是否为满足遭受卫生不公平的人的需求而定制?研究人员在10个数据库中搜索了有关认知行为疗法、认知行为疗法、正念冥想和神经性疼痛的研究。总共筛选了1732篇摘要,包括22篇原始研究的24篇文章。这些研究的主要特征显示,99%的参与者患有可归因于糖尿病、癌症或脊髓损伤的NP。结果与先前的综述一致,表明CBT、正念和冥想疗法在缓解NP方面有希望。然而,人口统计数据的报告很差,参与者之间的多样性很小。来自卫生不平等群体的个人基本上没有代表。虽然55%的研究定制了干预材料并提供了支持长期实践的内容,但很少有研究包括长期随访来评估持续影响。总的来说,关于这一主题的研究在包括和解决遭受卫生不平等的人的需求方面做得不够。未来的研究应优先考虑更广泛的参与者纳入标准,让有干预设计和实施生活经验的个体参与进来,并进行长期随访,以提高NP干预的可及性、相关性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologic Reviews
Epidemiologic Reviews 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Epidemiologic Reviews is a leading review journal in public health. Published once a year, issues collect review articles on a particular subject. Recent issues have focused on The Obesity Epidemic, Epidemiologic Research on Health Disparities, and Epidemiologic Approaches to Global Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书