Analysis of chronic pain patients at a multidisciplinary spine center.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain management Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-10 DOI:10.1080/17581869.2026.2625647
Lisa R Witkin, Jessica Kim, Jacky Choi, Silis Y Jiang, Jonathan N Tobin
{"title":"Analysis of chronic pain patients at a multidisciplinary spine center.","authors":"Lisa R Witkin, Jessica Kim, Jacky Choi, Silis Y Jiang, Jonathan N Tobin","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2625647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective is to characterize patients presenting to a multidisciplinary spine center to understand sociodemographic features, pain characteristics, and functional status across diagnoses. The secondary objective is to identify factors associated with worse outcomes in radiculopathy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, registry-based cohort study, we extracted questionnaire and EHR data for 10,069 patients. Baseline sociodemographic, clinical, and pain-related were examined across the top 10 diagnostic categories. Thereafter, we performed an analysis of radiculopathy patients (<i>n</i> = 653) using GLMM with random intercepts to identify baseline factors associated with changes in NRS and PROMIS-PI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At presentation, patients had moderate pain intensity (mean NRS:5.1, SD:2.1), significant impairment in PROMIS-PI (mean:64.6, SD:7.9), and PROMIS-PF (mean:37.7, SD:8.9), regardless of the diagnosis. Longitudinal analysis of radiculopathy patients identified multiple statistically significant factors (<i>p</i> < 0.05) associated with worse outcomes, including sleep interference, depression/anxiety, smoking, BMI, and being female, Black/African American, or Asian race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study explores predictors of poor outcomes that may identify opportunities for interventions targeting modifiable risk factors and highlights the need for further research into how health disparities influence treatment outcomes. Identifying non-responders could improve selecting effective treatments through precision care, ultimately reducing costs and disability associated with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"405-418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2625647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective is to characterize patients presenting to a multidisciplinary spine center to understand sociodemographic features, pain characteristics, and functional status across diagnoses. The secondary objective is to identify factors associated with worse outcomes in radiculopathy patients.

Methods: In this retrospective, registry-based cohort study, we extracted questionnaire and EHR data for 10,069 patients. Baseline sociodemographic, clinical, and pain-related were examined across the top 10 diagnostic categories. Thereafter, we performed an analysis of radiculopathy patients (n = 653) using GLMM with random intercepts to identify baseline factors associated with changes in NRS and PROMIS-PI.

Results: At presentation, patients had moderate pain intensity (mean NRS:5.1, SD:2.1), significant impairment in PROMIS-PI (mean:64.6, SD:7.9), and PROMIS-PF (mean:37.7, SD:8.9), regardless of the diagnosis. Longitudinal analysis of radiculopathy patients identified multiple statistically significant factors (p < 0.05) associated with worse outcomes, including sleep interference, depression/anxiety, smoking, BMI, and being female, Black/African American, or Asian race.

Conclusions: This study explores predictors of poor outcomes that may identify opportunities for interventions targeting modifiable risk factors and highlights the need for further research into how health disparities influence treatment outcomes. Identifying non-responders could improve selecting effective treatments through precision care, ultimately reducing costs and disability associated with chronic pain.

多学科脊柱中心慢性疼痛患者分析。
目的:主要目的是描述到多学科脊柱中心就诊的患者的特征,以了解不同诊断的社会人口统计学特征、疼痛特征和功能状态。次要目的是确定与神经根病患者预后不良相关的因素。方法:在这项基于登记的回顾性队列研究中,我们提取了10069例患者的问卷调查和电子病历数据。基线社会人口学,临床和疼痛相关检查了前10个诊断类别。此后,我们对神经根病患者(n = 653)进行了GLMM随机截距分析,以确定与NRS和promisi - pi变化相关的基线因素。结果:无论诊断如何,患者在入院时均有中度疼痛强度(平均NRS:5.1, SD:2.1), promise - pi(平均:64.6,SD:7.9)和promise - pf(平均:37.7,SD:8.9)明显受损。对神经根病患者的纵向分析发现了多个具有统计学意义的因素(p)。结论:本研究探讨了不良预后的预测因素,可能为针对可改变的危险因素的干预提供了机会,并强调了进一步研究健康差异如何影响治疗结果的必要性。识别无反应者可以通过精确护理改善选择有效的治疗方法,最终降低成本和与慢性疼痛相关的残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书