{"title":"Dynamic optimization meets budgeting: Unraveling financial complexities","authors":"Guidon Fenig , Luba Petersen","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores sources of complexity in dynamic optimization, examining how individuals navigate variation in incomes, prices, and returns in ten-period consumption-saving decisions. Our findings reveal that dynamic optimization poses significant challenges, resulting in suboptimal choices even in straightforward scenarios with stable parameters, full information, no uncertainty, and opportunities to learn. These challenges intensify in scenarios involving complexities such as frequent price changes and compounding returns, characterized by a pronounced tendency to over-smooth consumption. Additionally, we introduce a novel budgeting calculator aimed to assist with consumption planning and to collect valuable non-choice data on subjects’ planning strategies and horizons-an approach not previously utilized in studies of dynamic optimization. Participants’ actual planning horizons tend to be longer than their consumption decisions would imply. Complete planning leads to better performance in more complex scenarios, even when people do not optimally utilize the calculator. However, there is little reoptimization after the first period and participants tend to stick with suboptimal plans for most of their life cycle. The decision to plan is less influenced by the complexity of the economic environment and more by the length of the planning horizon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 107333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125004500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper explores sources of complexity in dynamic optimization, examining how individuals navigate variation in incomes, prices, and returns in ten-period consumption-saving decisions. Our findings reveal that dynamic optimization poses significant challenges, resulting in suboptimal choices even in straightforward scenarios with stable parameters, full information, no uncertainty, and opportunities to learn. These challenges intensify in scenarios involving complexities such as frequent price changes and compounding returns, characterized by a pronounced tendency to over-smooth consumption. Additionally, we introduce a novel budgeting calculator aimed to assist with consumption planning and to collect valuable non-choice data on subjects’ planning strategies and horizons-an approach not previously utilized in studies of dynamic optimization. Participants’ actual planning horizons tend to be longer than their consumption decisions would imply. Complete planning leads to better performance in more complex scenarios, even when people do not optimally utilize the calculator. However, there is little reoptimization after the first period and participants tend to stick with suboptimal plans for most of their life cycle. The decision to plan is less influenced by the complexity of the economic environment and more by the length of the planning horizon.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.