Dynamic optimization meets budgeting: Unraveling financial complexities

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Guidon Fenig , Luba Petersen
{"title":"Dynamic optimization meets budgeting: Unraveling financial complexities","authors":"Guidon Fenig ,&nbsp;Luba Petersen","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores sources of complexity in dynamic optimization, examining how individuals navigate variation in incomes, prices, and returns in ten-period consumption-saving decisions. Our findings reveal that dynamic optimization poses significant challenges, resulting in suboptimal choices even in straightforward scenarios with stable parameters, full information, no uncertainty, and opportunities to learn. These challenges intensify in scenarios involving complexities such as frequent price changes and compounding returns, characterized by a pronounced tendency to over-smooth consumption. Additionally, we introduce a novel budgeting calculator aimed to assist with consumption planning and to collect valuable non-choice data on subjects’ planning strategies and horizons-an approach not previously utilized in studies of dynamic optimization. Participants’ actual planning horizons tend to be longer than their consumption decisions would imply. Complete planning leads to better performance in more complex scenarios, even when people do not optimally utilize the calculator. However, there is little reoptimization after the first period and participants tend to stick with suboptimal plans for most of their life cycle. The decision to plan is less influenced by the complexity of the economic environment and more by the length of the planning horizon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 107333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125004500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores sources of complexity in dynamic optimization, examining how individuals navigate variation in incomes, prices, and returns in ten-period consumption-saving decisions. Our findings reveal that dynamic optimization poses significant challenges, resulting in suboptimal choices even in straightforward scenarios with stable parameters, full information, no uncertainty, and opportunities to learn. These challenges intensify in scenarios involving complexities such as frequent price changes and compounding returns, characterized by a pronounced tendency to over-smooth consumption. Additionally, we introduce a novel budgeting calculator aimed to assist with consumption planning and to collect valuable non-choice data on subjects’ planning strategies and horizons-an approach not previously utilized in studies of dynamic optimization. Participants’ actual planning horizons tend to be longer than their consumption decisions would imply. Complete planning leads to better performance in more complex scenarios, even when people do not optimally utilize the calculator. However, there is little reoptimization after the first period and participants tend to stick with suboptimal plans for most of their life cycle. The decision to plan is less influenced by the complexity of the economic environment and more by the length of the planning horizon.
动态优化满足预算:解开财务复杂性
本文探讨了动态优化中复杂性的来源,考察了个人如何在十期消费-储蓄决策中驾驭收入、价格和回报的变化。我们的研究结果表明,动态优化带来了巨大的挑战,即使在具有稳定参数、充分信息、没有不确定性和学习机会的简单场景中,也会导致次优选择。这些挑战在复杂的情况下加剧,如频繁的价格变化和复合回报,其特点是过度平滑消费的明显趋势。此外,我们还引入了一种新的预算计算器,旨在协助进行消费规划,并收集有关受试者规划策略和水平的有价值的非选择数据——这是一种在动态优化研究中从未使用过的方法。参与者的实际规划周期往往比他们的消费决策所暗示的要长。在更复杂的情况下,完整的计划会带来更好的表现,即使人们没有最佳地利用计算器。然而,在第一阶段之后几乎没有再优化,参与者倾向于在他们生命周期的大部分时间里坚持次优计划。经济环境的复杂性对规划决策的影响较小,而规划周期的长短对决策的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书