Young Son , Bio Joo , Mina Park , Sung Jun Ahn , Sungjun Kim , Hong-Seon Lee
{"title":"Real-world use of PACS-integrated automated spine numbering in MRI","authors":"Young Son , Bio Joo , Mina Park , Sung Jun Ahn , Sungjun Kim , Hong-Seon Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2026.110744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Traditional methods of vertebral identification have predominantly relied on relative approaches, depending on discernible landmarks. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in radiology, aiming to augment the workflow of radiologists and the benefit of patients. This study aims to investigate the real-world application of picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-integrated automated spine numbering for the daily interpretation of spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study, at a tertiary hospital, analyzed 235 spine MRI cases from November 2023 to January 2024. The study focused on the effect of AI-assisted spine labeling system. We measured reading times from PACS log records, leading to the exclusion of 32 cases due to time outliers. Thus, 109 (53.7%) implemented AI, while 94 (46.3%) did not. Subgroup analysis evaluated differences based on the type of radiologist (specialist vs. resident), whether the examination was an initial or follow-up, and the anatomic region (lumbar vs. non-lumbar).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Integrating an AI-assisted spine labeling algorithm into the PACS significantly reduced reading times for residents (<em>p</em> < 0.05) but not for specialists. AI-implemented cases demonstrated high accuracy, with only 2.8% discordance. Despite AI implementation, overall reading times did not differ significantly (<em>p</em> = 0.0858).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AI has the potential to enhance efficiency, particularly benefiting trainees, by providing a consistent reference for the spinal anatomy. Future studies should explore the effect of AI on clinical outcomes and patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 110744"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707126000367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Traditional methods of vertebral identification have predominantly relied on relative approaches, depending on discernible landmarks. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in radiology, aiming to augment the workflow of radiologists and the benefit of patients. This study aims to investigate the real-world application of picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-integrated automated spine numbering for the daily interpretation of spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.
Methods
This retrospective study, at a tertiary hospital, analyzed 235 spine MRI cases from November 2023 to January 2024. The study focused on the effect of AI-assisted spine labeling system. We measured reading times from PACS log records, leading to the exclusion of 32 cases due to time outliers. Thus, 109 (53.7%) implemented AI, while 94 (46.3%) did not. Subgroup analysis evaluated differences based on the type of radiologist (specialist vs. resident), whether the examination was an initial or follow-up, and the anatomic region (lumbar vs. non-lumbar).
Results
Integrating an AI-assisted spine labeling algorithm into the PACS significantly reduced reading times for residents (p < 0.05) but not for specialists. AI-implemented cases demonstrated high accuracy, with only 2.8% discordance. Despite AI implementation, overall reading times did not differ significantly (p = 0.0858).
Conclusion
AI has the potential to enhance efficiency, particularly benefiting trainees, by providing a consistent reference for the spinal anatomy. Future studies should explore the effect of AI on clinical outcomes and patient care.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology