[Real-life data of the IVI interval after switching to faricimab therapy].

IF 0.6
Die Ophthalmologie Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s00347-026-02389-w
D S Muranyi, J Molling, U Hammer, A Habermann, G Lehmann, E Luci, C Buchwald, T Hammer
{"title":"[Real-life data of the IVI interval after switching to faricimab therapy].","authors":"D S Muranyi, J Molling, U Hammer, A Habermann, G Lehmann, E Luci, C Buchwald, T Hammer","doi":"10.1007/s00347-026-02389-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME), intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents currently represents the standard of care. Both treatment intervals and the choice of the optimal agent are critical determinants of therapeutic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the effect of switching from established anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab, bevacizumab or aflibercept) to faricimab on injection intervals in patients with nAMD or DME.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data were collected in a routine outpatient ophthalmology practice. Inclusion criteria were: (I) treatment according to a treat-and-extend protocol, (II) at least six intravitreal injections prior to switching to faricimab and (III) at least three subsequent faricimab injections. To assess disease-specific effects, patients were stratified into nAMD and DME subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 86 patients with a mean of 37 prior injections were included. The mean injection interval before switching to faricimab was 44 days. In the nAMD subgroup (n = 74, mean age 72 years), the interval significantly increased from 46 to 53 days (mean difference 7.45 days, p < 0.05). In the DME subgroup (n = 12, mean age 65 years), the interval significantly increased from 42 to 57 days (mean difference 15.25 days, p < 0.05). The effect size was moderate (Cohen's d = 0.56) with high statistical power (99.93%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Switching to faricimab resulted in a significant extension of treatment intervals in both indications, with patients with DME deriving the greatest benefit. Limitations include the small sample size and potential selection bias. These findings suggest an improved benefit-risk profile through reduced injection frequency. Additional real-world data and meta-analyses may help identify biomarkers to further individualize anti-VEGF therapy in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":72808,"journal":{"name":"Die Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":"298-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-026-02389-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME), intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents currently represents the standard of care. Both treatment intervals and the choice of the optimal agent are critical determinants of therapeutic outcomes.

Objective: This study evaluated the effect of switching from established anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab, bevacizumab or aflibercept) to faricimab on injection intervals in patients with nAMD or DME.

Material and methods: Data were collected in a routine outpatient ophthalmology practice. Inclusion criteria were: (I) treatment according to a treat-and-extend protocol, (II) at least six intravitreal injections prior to switching to faricimab and (III) at least three subsequent faricimab injections. To assess disease-specific effects, patients were stratified into nAMD and DME subgroups.

Results: A total of 86 patients with a mean of 37 prior injections were included. The mean injection interval before switching to faricimab was 44 days. In the nAMD subgroup (n = 74, mean age 72 years), the interval significantly increased from 46 to 53 days (mean difference 7.45 days, p < 0.05). In the DME subgroup (n = 12, mean age 65 years), the interval significantly increased from 42 to 57 days (mean difference 15.25 days, p < 0.05). The effect size was moderate (Cohen's d = 0.56) with high statistical power (99.93%).

Conclusion: Switching to faricimab resulted in a significant extension of treatment intervals in both indications, with patients with DME deriving the greatest benefit. Limitations include the small sample size and potential selection bias. These findings suggest an improved benefit-risk profile through reduced injection frequency. Additional real-world data and meta-analyses may help identify biomarkers to further individualize anti-VEGF therapy in the future.

[转入法利昔单抗治疗后IVI间隔的真实数据]。
背景:对于新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)和糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME),玻璃体内注射(IVI)抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)药物目前是标准的治疗方法。治疗间隔和最佳药物的选择是治疗结果的关键决定因素。目的:本研究评估从现有抗vegf药物(雷尼单抗、贝伐单抗或阿非利塞普)切换到法利西单抗对nAMD或DME患者注射间隔的影响。材料和方法:资料收集在常规门诊眼科实践。纳入标准是:(I)根据治疗和延长方案进行治疗,(II)在改用法利西单抗之前至少进行6次玻璃体内注射,(III)随后至少进行3次法利西单抗注射。为了评估疾病特异性影响,将患者分为nAMD和DME亚组。结果:共纳入86例患者,平均37次既往注射。改用法昔单抗前的平均注射间隔为44天。在nAMD亚组(n = 74,平均年龄72岁)中,间隔时间从46天显著增加到53天(平均差值7.45天,p )。结论:改用faricimab可显著延长两种适应症的治疗间隔时间,DME患者获益最大。局限性包括样本量小和潜在的选择偏差。这些研究结果表明,通过减少注射频率可以改善获益风险状况。额外的真实世界数据和荟萃分析可能有助于确定生物标志物,从而在未来进一步个体化抗vegf治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书