With a Little Help From My Car: Sharing Automated Vehicle's Situation Awareness Reduces Driver-Initiated Automation Disengagement Without Delaying Takeover Response Time.

IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Human Factors Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-07 DOI:10.1177/00187208261422917
Joonbum Lee, Hansol Rheem, John D Lee, Joseph F Szczerba, Akilesh Rajavenkatanarayanan, Roy Mathieu
{"title":"With a Little Help From My Car: Sharing Automated Vehicle's Situation Awareness Reduces Driver-Initiated Automation Disengagement Without Delaying Takeover Response Time.","authors":"Joonbum Lee, Hansol Rheem, John D Lee, Joseph F Szczerba, Akilesh Rajavenkatanarayanan, Roy Mathieu","doi":"10.1177/00187208261422917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study investigated the effect of sharing vehicle situation awareness (VSA) on driver takeover behavior in complex urban environments.BackgroundAs automated vehicles (AV) expand their operational design domain, little is known about driver interactions with driving automation in complex urban settings. Drivers often become either overly reliant on automation or fail to rely on it even when capable, leading to misuse or disuse. Sharing VSA information could enhance drivers' awareness of the AV system and response when AVs request manual control in complex situations.MethodsA driving simulator tested sharing VSA information via augmented reality head-up displays (AR HUDs) during takeover scenarios. Participants were assigned to control or experimental groups that received different combinations of VSA elements: perception (object highlighting), comprehension (confidence assessment), and projection (trajectory information). Two urban driving scenarios (parking lane and intersection) were tested.ResultsSharing VSA information reduced driver-initiated automation disengagement before takeover requests without delaying response times. Perception information alone showed no significant difference from baseline, but adding egocentric projection information significantly reduced driver-initiated overrides, while allocentric projection did not. Adding confidence assessment further enhanced effectiveness. The parking lane scenario was associated with quicker responses, fewer full takeovers, and softer braking.ConclusionSpecific combinations of VSA information reduced driver-initiated disengagement from automation without compromising response times. The type and presentation of shared information significantly affect human-automation interaction.ApplicationThese findings can guide the design of AV systems that better support driver-vehicle interaction in complex urban environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"953-971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261422917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study investigated the effect of sharing vehicle situation awareness (VSA) on driver takeover behavior in complex urban environments.BackgroundAs automated vehicles (AV) expand their operational design domain, little is known about driver interactions with driving automation in complex urban settings. Drivers often become either overly reliant on automation or fail to rely on it even when capable, leading to misuse or disuse. Sharing VSA information could enhance drivers' awareness of the AV system and response when AVs request manual control in complex situations.MethodsA driving simulator tested sharing VSA information via augmented reality head-up displays (AR HUDs) during takeover scenarios. Participants were assigned to control or experimental groups that received different combinations of VSA elements: perception (object highlighting), comprehension (confidence assessment), and projection (trajectory information). Two urban driving scenarios (parking lane and intersection) were tested.ResultsSharing VSA information reduced driver-initiated automation disengagement before takeover requests without delaying response times. Perception information alone showed no significant difference from baseline, but adding egocentric projection information significantly reduced driver-initiated overrides, while allocentric projection did not. Adding confidence assessment further enhanced effectiveness. The parking lane scenario was associated with quicker responses, fewer full takeovers, and softer braking.ConclusionSpecific combinations of VSA information reduced driver-initiated disengagement from automation without compromising response times. The type and presentation of shared information significantly affect human-automation interaction.ApplicationThese findings can guide the design of AV systems that better support driver-vehicle interaction in complex urban environments.

在我的车的一点帮助下:共享自动驾驶汽车的情况感知,在不延迟接管响应时间的情况下,减少驾驶员发起的自动脱离。
目的研究复杂城市环境下共享车辆态势感知(VSA)对驾驶员接管行为的影响。随着自动驾驶汽车(AV)的操作设计领域不断扩大,人们对复杂城市环境中驾驶员与自动驾驶之间的相互作用知之甚少。司机往往要么过度依赖自动化,要么即使有能力也不依赖它,从而导致误用或废弃。共享VSA信息可以增强驾驶员对自动驾驶系统的认知,以及在复杂情况下自动驾驶请求手动控制时的响应。方法一个驾驶模拟器测试了在接管场景下通过增强现实抬头显示器(AR hud)共享VSA信息。参与者被分配到对照组或实验组,接受不同的VSA元素组合:感知(对象突出显示),理解(信心评估)和投影(轨迹信息)。测试了两种城市驾驶场景(停车车道和十字路口)。结果:共享VSA信息减少了在接管请求之前由驾驶员发起的自动化脱离,而不会延迟响应时间。单独的感知信息与基线没有显著差异,但添加以自我为中心的投影信息显著减少了驾驶员发起的覆盖,而非以自我为中心的投影信息则没有显著差异。增加信心评估进一步提高了有效性。停车车道的场景与更快的反应、更少的全面接管和更软的制动有关。VSA信息的特定组合在不影响响应时间的情况下减少了驾驶员发起的脱离自动化。共享信息的类型和表示方式显著影响人机交互。这些发现可以指导自动驾驶系统的设计,以更好地支持复杂城市环境中的驾驶员-车辆交互。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书