Christopher I Carlson, Megan E Frederickson, Matthew M Osmond
{"title":"How Genotype-by-Environment Interactions Can Maintain Variation in Mutualisms.","authors":"Christopher I Carlson, Megan E Frederickson, Matthew M Osmond","doi":"10.1086/738501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractCoevolution requires reciprocal genotype-by-genotype (G × G) interactions for fitness, which occur when the fitness of a genotype in one species depends on the genotype it interacts with in another species and vice versa. However, in mutualisms, when G × G interactions are mutually beneficial, simple models predict that the resulting positive feedbacks will erode genetic variation. Here, we explore how genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions, which occur when the fitnesses of different genotypes respond differently to different environments, and G × G × E interactions, which occur when the environment changes the outcome of G × G interactions, maintain variation in mutualisms. We build a spatial population genetic model in which the fitnesses of two partners depend on mutually beneficial G × G, G × E, and G × G × E interactions. Our analysis shows that variation will always be maintained via migration-selection balance with stronger G × E than G × G interactions. However, strong G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically matched partners to fix, and, more surprisingly, weak G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically mismatched partners to fix at high dispersal rates, leading to apparent maladaptation between partners. We parameterize our model using data from three published reciprocal transplant experiments, infer the relative strengths of G × E and G × G, and discuss the implications for the maintenance of genetic variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"207 2","pages":"231-246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/738501","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractCoevolution requires reciprocal genotype-by-genotype (G × G) interactions for fitness, which occur when the fitness of a genotype in one species depends on the genotype it interacts with in another species and vice versa. However, in mutualisms, when G × G interactions are mutually beneficial, simple models predict that the resulting positive feedbacks will erode genetic variation. Here, we explore how genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions, which occur when the fitnesses of different genotypes respond differently to different environments, and G × G × E interactions, which occur when the environment changes the outcome of G × G interactions, maintain variation in mutualisms. We build a spatial population genetic model in which the fitnesses of two partners depend on mutually beneficial G × G, G × E, and G × G × E interactions. Our analysis shows that variation will always be maintained via migration-selection balance with stronger G × E than G × G interactions. However, strong G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically matched partners to fix, and, more surprisingly, weak G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically mismatched partners to fix at high dispersal rates, leading to apparent maladaptation between partners. We parameterize our model using data from three published reciprocal transplant experiments, infer the relative strengths of G × E and G × G, and discuss the implications for the maintenance of genetic variation.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.