How Genotype-by-Environment Interactions Can Maintain Variation in Mutualisms.

IF 2.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
American Naturalist Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-22 DOI:10.1086/738501
Christopher I Carlson, Megan E Frederickson, Matthew M Osmond
{"title":"How Genotype-by-Environment Interactions Can Maintain Variation in Mutualisms.","authors":"Christopher I Carlson, Megan E Frederickson, Matthew M Osmond","doi":"10.1086/738501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractCoevolution requires reciprocal genotype-by-genotype (G × G) interactions for fitness, which occur when the fitness of a genotype in one species depends on the genotype it interacts with in another species and vice versa. However, in mutualisms, when G × G interactions are mutually beneficial, simple models predict that the resulting positive feedbacks will erode genetic variation. Here, we explore how genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions, which occur when the fitnesses of different genotypes respond differently to different environments, and G × G × E interactions, which occur when the environment changes the outcome of G × G interactions, maintain variation in mutualisms. We build a spatial population genetic model in which the fitnesses of two partners depend on mutually beneficial G × G, G × E, and G × G × E interactions. Our analysis shows that variation will always be maintained via migration-selection balance with stronger G × E than G × G interactions. However, strong G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically matched partners to fix, and, more surprisingly, weak G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically mismatched partners to fix at high dispersal rates, leading to apparent maladaptation between partners. We parameterize our model using data from three published reciprocal transplant experiments, infer the relative strengths of G × E and G × G, and discuss the implications for the maintenance of genetic variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"207 2","pages":"231-246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/738501","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractCoevolution requires reciprocal genotype-by-genotype (G × G) interactions for fitness, which occur when the fitness of a genotype in one species depends on the genotype it interacts with in another species and vice versa. However, in mutualisms, when G × G interactions are mutually beneficial, simple models predict that the resulting positive feedbacks will erode genetic variation. Here, we explore how genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions, which occur when the fitnesses of different genotypes respond differently to different environments, and G × G × E interactions, which occur when the environment changes the outcome of G × G interactions, maintain variation in mutualisms. We build a spatial population genetic model in which the fitnesses of two partners depend on mutually beneficial G × G, G × E, and G × G × E interactions. Our analysis shows that variation will always be maintained via migration-selection balance with stronger G × E than G × G interactions. However, strong G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically matched partners to fix, and, more surprisingly, weak G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically mismatched partners to fix at high dispersal rates, leading to apparent maladaptation between partners. We parameterize our model using data from three published reciprocal transplant experiments, infer the relative strengths of G × E and G × G, and discuss the implications for the maintenance of genetic variation.

基因型与环境的相互作用如何维持共生关系中的变异。
摘要共同进化需要基因型-基因型(G × G)相互作用来实现适应度,当一个物种的基因型的适应度依赖于与之相互作用的另一个物种的基因型时,反之亦然。然而,在互惠关系中,当G × G相互作用是互利的,简单的模型预测,由此产生的正反馈将侵蚀遗传变异。在这里,我们探讨基因型-环境相互作用(当不同基因型的适应度对不同环境做出不同反应时发生)和基因型-环境相互作用(当环境改变基因型-基因型相互作用的结果时发生)如何维持共生关系的变化。我们建立了一个空间种群遗传模型,其中两个伙伴的适应度依赖于互利的G × G、G × E和G × G × E相互作用。我们的分析表明,变异总是通过迁移-选择平衡来维持的,其中G × E比G × G相互作用更强。然而,强的G × G相互作用可以通过允许基因典型匹配的伴侣固定来侵蚀变异,更令人惊讶的是,弱的G × G相互作用可以通过允许基因典型不匹配的伴侣以高分散率固定来侵蚀变异,导致伴侣之间明显的不适应。我们使用三个已发表的互惠移植实验的数据来参数化我们的模型,推断出G × E和G × G的相对优势,并讨论了对遗传变异维持的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Naturalist
American Naturalist 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书