Impact of calcium suppression imaging on hand and wrist fracture detection in spectral CT: a comparison with X-ray and CT.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Skeletal Radiology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s00256-026-05156-9
Thomas Marth, Franziska Adomat, Fides R Schwartz, Tim S Fischer, Reto Sutter, Anna L Falkowski
{"title":"Impact of calcium suppression imaging on hand and wrist fracture detection in spectral CT: a comparison with X-ray and CT.","authors":"Thomas Marth, Franziska Adomat, Fides R Schwartz, Tim S Fischer, Reto Sutter, Anna L Falkowski","doi":"10.1007/s00256-026-05156-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of calcium suppression (CaSupp) imaging of spectral computed tomography (SpCT) on fracture detection in clinical routine in the acute trauma setting of the hand and wrist.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective inclusion of 125 patients who underwent both X-ray and SpCT examinations of the hand and wrist in an acute trauma setting. Two independent readers evaluated fracture presence on X-ray, conventional CT, and conventional CT plus CaSupp images (time interval 4 weeks, each). Bone bruise (BBr) presence was evaluated on CaSupp images. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated according to the consensus reading as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 125 patients (mean age, 55 years ± 19.5 [SD]; 67 female), 120 presented with at least one fracture, for a total of 212 fractured bones. Sensitivity was increased significantly for both readers in CT + CaSupp (94.3 and 97.2%) compared to conventional CT (88.2 and 90.1%, p < .01) and X-ray (72.6 and 75.9%, p < .01). Specificity was 99.9 and 100% for CT + CaSupp, 99.8 and 99.9% for conventional CT, and 99.4 and 99.9% for X-ray. Reader 1 detected 13 additional fractures in CT + CaSupp compared to conventional CT alone, while Reader 2 detected 15 additional fractures. BBr was seen in 58% of all fractures, in 76% of multifragmentary fractures, and in 13% of avulsion fractures. Inter-reader κ was almost perfect for X-ray (κ = .85), CT and CT + CaSupp (κ = .95), and substantial for BBr (κ = .61).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CaSupp images in combination with conventional CT images significantly improved sensitivity for acute trauma fracture detection in the hand and wrist compared to conventional CT images alone and X-ray.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1297-1307"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-026-05156-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of calcium suppression (CaSupp) imaging of spectral computed tomography (SpCT) on fracture detection in clinical routine in the acute trauma setting of the hand and wrist.

Materials and methods: Retrospective inclusion of 125 patients who underwent both X-ray and SpCT examinations of the hand and wrist in an acute trauma setting. Two independent readers evaluated fracture presence on X-ray, conventional CT, and conventional CT plus CaSupp images (time interval 4 weeks, each). Bone bruise (BBr) presence was evaluated on CaSupp images. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated according to the consensus reading as the reference standard.

Results: Of the 125 patients (mean age, 55 years ± 19.5 [SD]; 67 female), 120 presented with at least one fracture, for a total of 212 fractured bones. Sensitivity was increased significantly for both readers in CT + CaSupp (94.3 and 97.2%) compared to conventional CT (88.2 and 90.1%, p < .01) and X-ray (72.6 and 75.9%, p < .01). Specificity was 99.9 and 100% for CT + CaSupp, 99.8 and 99.9% for conventional CT, and 99.4 and 99.9% for X-ray. Reader 1 detected 13 additional fractures in CT + CaSupp compared to conventional CT alone, while Reader 2 detected 15 additional fractures. BBr was seen in 58% of all fractures, in 76% of multifragmentary fractures, and in 13% of avulsion fractures. Inter-reader κ was almost perfect for X-ray (κ = .85), CT and CT + CaSupp (κ = .95), and substantial for BBr (κ = .61).

Conclusion: CaSupp images in combination with conventional CT images significantly improved sensitivity for acute trauma fracture detection in the hand and wrist compared to conventional CT images alone and X-ray.

钙抑制成像对光谱CT手部和腕部骨折检测的影响:与x线和CT的比较。
目的:评价光谱计算机断层扫描(SpCT)钙抑制(CaSupp)成像在临床常规手腕部急性创伤骨折检测中的作用。材料和方法:回顾性纳入125例在急性创伤情况下接受手和手腕x线和SpCT检查的患者。两名独立的阅读者评估了x射线、常规CT和常规CT加CaSupp图像上的骨折存在情况(每次间隔4周)。在CaSupp图像上评估骨挫伤(BBr)的存在。以共识读数为参考标准计算灵敏度和特异度。结果:125例患者(平均年龄55岁±19.5 [SD]; 67例女性)中,120例出现至少一处骨折,共212例骨折。与常规CT(88.2和90.1%)相比,CT + CaSupp两种读卡器的灵敏度(94.3和97.2%)均显著提高。p结论:与常规CT和x线相比,CaSupp联合常规CT对手部和腕部急性创伤骨折的检测灵敏度显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书