Texas Card Sorting Test: a Brief Test of Executive Functioning with Age-Adjusted Norms and External Validation.

IF 2.1
Laura H Lacritz, Alyssa N Kaser, Francisco Argueta-Ortiz, Linda S Hynan, C Munro Cullum
{"title":"Texas Card Sorting Test: a Brief Test of Executive Functioning with Age-Adjusted Norms and External Validation.","authors":"Laura H Lacritz, Alyssa N Kaser, Francisco Argueta-Ortiz, Linda S Hynan, C Munro Cullum","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acag004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Texas Card Sorting Test (TCST) is a brief test of executive functioning that involves sorting cards into groups based on like dimensions. The TCST is shorter than most available executive function measures, requires minimal language demands, and excludes negative feedback. This study generated age-adjusted normative data for the TCST in a healthy aging, normal control (NC) sample, examined its sensitivity and specificity, assessed convergent validity, and compared NC performance to an Alzheimer's disease clinical syndrome (ADCS) sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>TCST data from 164 NC [Mage = 69.60 (SD = 8.6); Meducation = 15.46 years (SD = 2.83)] and 92 ADCS participants [Mage = 77.73 (SD = 7.55); Meducation = 13.65 years (SD = 3.53)] were obtained as part of a larger neuropsychological battery at Texas Alzheimer's Research and Care Consortium (TARCC) sites from which age-adjusted normative data were derived and sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and validity were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TCST Logical Sorts (LS), or correct card sorts, were significantly correlated with age, education, and other executive function measures. Lower but significant correlations were seen with attention and memory measures. TCST performance (LS and total errors) significantly differed between groups [F (1,249) = 142, p < .001 and F(1,248) = 26.5, p < .001]. Receiver operating characteristics analysis yielded an AUC of 0.912, sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 73%, and classification accuracy of 84% for NC versus ADCS. Optimal T score cut-offs, regression-based norms, and a T score calculator are provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the TCST's validity and feasibility as a brief measure of executive functioning that can accurately discriminate between normal aging and dementia. Normative data provided will enhance interpretation of this measure.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acag004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Texas Card Sorting Test (TCST) is a brief test of executive functioning that involves sorting cards into groups based on like dimensions. The TCST is shorter than most available executive function measures, requires minimal language demands, and excludes negative feedback. This study generated age-adjusted normative data for the TCST in a healthy aging, normal control (NC) sample, examined its sensitivity and specificity, assessed convergent validity, and compared NC performance to an Alzheimer's disease clinical syndrome (ADCS) sample.

Method: TCST data from 164 NC [Mage = 69.60 (SD = 8.6); Meducation = 15.46 years (SD = 2.83)] and 92 ADCS participants [Mage = 77.73 (SD = 7.55); Meducation = 13.65 years (SD = 3.53)] were obtained as part of a larger neuropsychological battery at Texas Alzheimer's Research and Care Consortium (TARCC) sites from which age-adjusted normative data were derived and sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and validity were examined.

Results: TCST Logical Sorts (LS), or correct card sorts, were significantly correlated with age, education, and other executive function measures. Lower but significant correlations were seen with attention and memory measures. TCST performance (LS and total errors) significantly differed between groups [F (1,249) = 142, p < .001 and F(1,248) = 26.5, p < .001]. Receiver operating characteristics analysis yielded an AUC of 0.912, sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 73%, and classification accuracy of 84% for NC versus ADCS. Optimal T score cut-offs, regression-based norms, and a T score calculator are provided.

Conclusions: These findings support the TCST's validity and feasibility as a brief measure of executive functioning that can accurately discriminate between normal aging and dementia. Normative data provided will enhance interpretation of this measure.

德州卡片分类测验:具有年龄调整规范和外部验证的执行功能简要测验。
目的:德克萨斯卡片分类测试(TCST)是一个简短的执行功能测试,包括将卡片分类成基于相似维度的组。TCST比大多数可用的执行功能测试更短,对语言要求最低,并且排除负面反馈。本研究在健康衰老正常对照(NC)样本中生成了年龄调整后的TCST规范数据,检验了其敏感性和特异性,评估了收敛效度,并将NC的表现与阿尔茨海默病临床综合征(ADCS)样本进行了比较。方法:164例NC患者的TCST数据[Mage = 69.60 (SD = 8.6);年龄= 15.46岁(SD = 2.83)]和92名ADCS参与者[年龄= 77.73 (SD = 7.55);教育= 13.65年(SD = 3.53)]作为德克萨斯阿尔茨海默病研究和护理联盟(TARCC)站点更大的神经心理学研究的一部分,从中获得年龄调整的规范数据,并检查了敏感性、特异性、诊断准确性和有效性。结果:TCST逻辑分类(LS)或正确卡片分类与年龄、教育程度和其他执行功能测量显著相关。注意力和记忆力之间的相关性较低,但也很显著。TCST表现(LS和总误差)在两组之间存在显著差异[F (1,249) = 142, p]。结论:这些发现支持TCST作为执行功能的简短衡量标准的有效性和可行性,可以准确区分正常衰老和痴呆。所提供的规范性数据将加强对这一措施的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书