Metabolic growth mechanisms and theoretical growth potential of global woody plant communities

IF 9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Shumiao Shu, Xiaolu Tang, George Kontsevich, Xiaodan Wang, Wanze Zhu, Yangyi Zhao, Wenzhi Wang, Xiaoxiang Zhao, Zhaoyong Hu
{"title":"Metabolic growth mechanisms and theoretical growth potential of global woody plant communities","authors":"Shumiao Shu,&nbsp;Xiaolu Tang,&nbsp;George Kontsevich,&nbsp;Xiaodan Wang,&nbsp;Wanze Zhu,&nbsp;Yangyi Zhao,&nbsp;Wenzhi Wang,&nbsp;Xiaoxiang Zhao,&nbsp;Zhaoyong Hu","doi":"10.1002/ecm.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predicting the growth and maximum biomass (<i>M</i><sub>max</sub>) of woody plant communities (WPCs) remains a central challenge in terrestrial ecology due to the complex and heterogeneous nature of tree growth. While metabolic scaling theory (MST) provides a valuable conceptual framework, it remains limited in its ability to fully explain community-level growth or carbon dynamics. To address this limitation, we developed an iterative growth model for forests (IGMF), built upon an iterative growth framework grounded in MST's core principles and further incorporating the self-thinning effect. The IGMF and its extensions suggest that community-level growth, net primary productivity (NPP), and other key components of the carbon budget—including gross primary productivity, autotrophic respiration, organ turnover, and non-structural carbohydrate storage—may be approximated as functions of current biomass, biomass-specific maintenance respiration, stand age, or <i>M</i><sub>max</sub>. These relationships provide a basis for estimating the global <i>M</i><sub>max</sub> of WPCs during 2018–2020 at approximately 1440 ± 26 Pg (1 Pg = 1 × 10<sup>15</sup> g), with an additional biomass potential of about 510 Pg under current conditions. However, machine learning projections suggest that this potential may decline by up to 246 Pg by 2100, primarily within evergreen broadleaf forests. Our analyses also indicate that species richness, by promoting functional convergence, can amplify the negative effects of temperature and precipitation seasonality on <i>M</i><sub>max</sub>. In contrast, warming in the Northern Hemisphere may favor <i>M</i><sub>max</sub> accumulation in open shrublands. Together, these results help to clarify the growth dynamics of WPCs and suggest a possible shift in the major contributors to terrestrial carbon sequestration—from forests to shrublands—under future climate scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting the growth and maximum biomass (Mmax) of woody plant communities (WPCs) remains a central challenge in terrestrial ecology due to the complex and heterogeneous nature of tree growth. While metabolic scaling theory (MST) provides a valuable conceptual framework, it remains limited in its ability to fully explain community-level growth or carbon dynamics. To address this limitation, we developed an iterative growth model for forests (IGMF), built upon an iterative growth framework grounded in MST's core principles and further incorporating the self-thinning effect. The IGMF and its extensions suggest that community-level growth, net primary productivity (NPP), and other key components of the carbon budget—including gross primary productivity, autotrophic respiration, organ turnover, and non-structural carbohydrate storage—may be approximated as functions of current biomass, biomass-specific maintenance respiration, stand age, or Mmax. These relationships provide a basis for estimating the global Mmax of WPCs during 2018–2020 at approximately 1440 ± 26 Pg (1 Pg = 1 × 1015 g), with an additional biomass potential of about 510 Pg under current conditions. However, machine learning projections suggest that this potential may decline by up to 246 Pg by 2100, primarily within evergreen broadleaf forests. Our analyses also indicate that species richness, by promoting functional convergence, can amplify the negative effects of temperature and precipitation seasonality on Mmax. In contrast, warming in the Northern Hemisphere may favor Mmax accumulation in open shrublands. Together, these results help to clarify the growth dynamics of WPCs and suggest a possible shift in the major contributors to terrestrial carbon sequestration—from forests to shrublands—under future climate scenarios.

全球木本植物群落代谢生长机制及理论生长潜力
由于树木生长的复杂性和异质性,预测木本植物群落(WPCs)的生长和最大生物量(mmax)仍然是陆地生态学的核心挑战。虽然代谢标度理论(MST)提供了一个有价值的概念框架,但它在充分解释群落水平生长或碳动态方面的能力仍然有限。为了解决这一限制,我们开发了一个森林的迭代生长模型(IGMF),该模型建立在基于MST核心原则的迭代生长框架之上,并进一步纳入了自疏效应。IGMF及其扩展表明,群落水平生长、净初级生产力(NPP)和碳收支的其他关键组成部分——包括总初级生产力、自养呼吸、器官周转量和非结构性碳水化合物储量——可以近似为当前生物量、生物量特异性维持呼吸、林龄或最大生物量的函数。这些关系为估计2018-2020年全球WPCs最大M值约为1440±26 Pg (1 Pg = 1 × 10 15 g)提供了基础,在当前条件下,额外的生物质潜力约为510 Pg。然而,机器学习预测表明,到2100年,这一潜力可能会下降246 Pg,主要是在常绿阔叶林中。物种丰富度通过促进功能收敛,可以放大温度和降水季节性对最大降水量的负面影响。相反,北半球变暖可能有利于开阔灌丛的max积累。总之,这些结果有助于澄清WPCs的生长动态,并提出在未来气候情景下陆地碳固存的主要贡献者(从森林到灌丛)可能发生的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书