Laura Simon , Lena Sophia Steubl , Merritt Gossmann , Michael Stach , Yannik Terhorst , Julia Witte , Olaf Reis , Michael Kölch , Christoph Berger , Rüdiger Pryss , Harald Baumeister , Alexander Dück
{"title":"Swipe for sleep - a standardized evaluation of mobile health apps for insomnia in children and adolescents","authors":"Laura Simon , Lena Sophia Steubl , Merritt Gossmann , Michael Stach , Yannik Terhorst , Julia Witte , Olaf Reis , Michael Kölch , Christoph Berger , Rüdiger Pryss , Harald Baumeister , Alexander Dück","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2026.108814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Access to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) in children and adolescents is limited. Mobile health applications (MHAs) available in app stores may provide an accessible and scalable option for delivering CBT-I. This study systematically evaluated the quality of MHAs targeting insomnia in children and adolescents and examined their evidence base and treatment components.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In November 2024, a systematic search of the Google Play and Apple App Stores was conducted to identify MHAs targeting insomnia in children and adolescents. MHAs were screened for eligibility in a two-level process: first based on app store descriptions, then after downloading the MHA. Eligible MHAs were independently evaluated using the German Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS-G), which rates MHAs from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent) across the subscales engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information. Additionally, the featured treatment components and supporting scientific evidence were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 2341 MHAs initially identified, eight MHA products met the inclusion criteria. The overall quality was moderate (mean = 3.5, SD = 0.4). Among the subscales, functionality was rated highest (mean = 3.8, SD = 0.6), followed by aesthetics (mean = 3.6, SD = 0.6), engagement (mean = 3.3, SD = 0.4), and information (mean = 3.1, SD = 0.8). Sleep hygiene was the most commonly featured treatment component (seven MHA products). While scientific evidence was identified for five MHA products, none specifically evaluated insomnia in the target population.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although many MHAs claim to target sleep in children and adolescents, few incorporate CBT-I components beyond sleep hygiene. The moderate quality and limited evidence base underscore the need for theory-driven, rigorously evaluated MHAs tailored to this age group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945726000523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Access to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) in children and adolescents is limited. Mobile health applications (MHAs) available in app stores may provide an accessible and scalable option for delivering CBT-I. This study systematically evaluated the quality of MHAs targeting insomnia in children and adolescents and examined their evidence base and treatment components.
Methods
In November 2024, a systematic search of the Google Play and Apple App Stores was conducted to identify MHAs targeting insomnia in children and adolescents. MHAs were screened for eligibility in a two-level process: first based on app store descriptions, then after downloading the MHA. Eligible MHAs were independently evaluated using the German Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS-G), which rates MHAs from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent) across the subscales engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information. Additionally, the featured treatment components and supporting scientific evidence were assessed.
Results
Of 2341 MHAs initially identified, eight MHA products met the inclusion criteria. The overall quality was moderate (mean = 3.5, SD = 0.4). Among the subscales, functionality was rated highest (mean = 3.8, SD = 0.6), followed by aesthetics (mean = 3.6, SD = 0.6), engagement (mean = 3.3, SD = 0.4), and information (mean = 3.1, SD = 0.8). Sleep hygiene was the most commonly featured treatment component (seven MHA products). While scientific evidence was identified for five MHA products, none specifically evaluated insomnia in the target population.
Conclusion
Although many MHAs claim to target sleep in children and adolescents, few incorporate CBT-I components beyond sleep hygiene. The moderate quality and limited evidence base underscore the need for theory-driven, rigorously evaluated MHAs tailored to this age group.
期刊介绍:
Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without.
A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry.
The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.