Hazard-based seismic fragility functions for steel moment-resisting frame buildings through data-driven damage state identification

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2026-04-15 Epub Date: 2026-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122270
Amir Hossein Asjodi
{"title":"Hazard-based seismic fragility functions for steel moment-resisting frame buildings through data-driven damage state identification","authors":"Amir Hossein Asjodi","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper employs supervised and unsupervised learning methods to present hazard-based seismic fragility functions for Steel Moment-Resisting Frame (SMRF) buildings. The database supporting this research comprises structural responses of over 12,000 time history analyses for 100 SMRF buildings lumped into three categories: low-, mid-, and high-rise. The ground motions have been selected to represent three hazard levels, resulting in Service Level Earthquake (SLE), Design Basis Earthquake (DBE), and Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE). Considering the primary period of each building and the target response spectra, a set of ground motions is selected, and the peak story drift ratios are extracted. Subsequently, unsupervised clustering techniques are employed to identify drift thresholds that distinguish between different damage states across various hazard levels, thereby refining the fixed boundaries recommended in existing codes and guidelines. Supervised learning techniques, on the other hand, are employed to predict the maximum drift ratio using features from ground motions and structural periods. The resulting drift ratio serves as an Engineering Demand Parameter (EDP), which, along with the hazard-informed drift threshold, is used to generate a machine learning-based fragility function. The proposed approach enables damage state identification of SMRF buildings under a specific ground motion, using only structural periods and signal features, without requiring detailed structural response data. The results of this study provide a set of site-specific hazard-based fragility curves, supporting seismic risk and loss assessment across different earthquake intensities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 122270"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029626001835","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper employs supervised and unsupervised learning methods to present hazard-based seismic fragility functions for Steel Moment-Resisting Frame (SMRF) buildings. The database supporting this research comprises structural responses of over 12,000 time history analyses for 100 SMRF buildings lumped into three categories: low-, mid-, and high-rise. The ground motions have been selected to represent three hazard levels, resulting in Service Level Earthquake (SLE), Design Basis Earthquake (DBE), and Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE). Considering the primary period of each building and the target response spectra, a set of ground motions is selected, and the peak story drift ratios are extracted. Subsequently, unsupervised clustering techniques are employed to identify drift thresholds that distinguish between different damage states across various hazard levels, thereby refining the fixed boundaries recommended in existing codes and guidelines. Supervised learning techniques, on the other hand, are employed to predict the maximum drift ratio using features from ground motions and structural periods. The resulting drift ratio serves as an Engineering Demand Parameter (EDP), which, along with the hazard-informed drift threshold, is used to generate a machine learning-based fragility function. The proposed approach enables damage state identification of SMRF buildings under a specific ground motion, using only structural periods and signal features, without requiring detailed structural response data. The results of this study provide a set of site-specific hazard-based fragility curves, supporting seismic risk and loss assessment across different earthquake intensities.
基于数据驱动损伤状态识别的钢框架结构地震易损性函数
本文采用监督学习和无监督学习两种方法,建立了钢框架结构基于危险性的地震易损性函数。支持这项研究的数据库包括100个SMRF建筑的12,000多个时间历史分析的结构响应,这些建筑分为三类:低层、中层和高层。地面运动被选择代表三个危险级别,导致服务级别地震(SLE),设计基础地震(DBE)和最大考虑地震(MCE)。考虑每个建筑物的初始周期和目标响应谱,选择一组地震动,提取峰值层漂移比。随后,采用无监督聚类技术来识别漂移阈值,以区分不同危险级别的不同损害状态,从而改进现有规范和指南中推荐的固定边界。另一方面,监督学习技术被用来利用地面运动和结构周期的特征来预测最大漂移比。由此产生的漂移比作为工程需求参数(EDP),该参数与危险通知漂移阈值一起用于生成基于机器学习的脆弱性函数。所提出的方法能够在特定的地面运动下识别SMRF建筑物的损坏状态,仅使用结构周期和信号特征,而不需要详细的结构响应数据。本研究的结果提供了一套特定地点的基于灾害的脆弱性曲线,支持不同地震烈度下的地震风险和损失评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书