Which Protein-Based Dietary Supplements Most Effectively Enhance Fat-Free Mass and Strength Gains in Healthy Adults Undergoing Resistance Training? A Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Translational sports medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-02 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/tsm2/5557511
Marcos D M Drummond, Ronaldo A D Silva, Nelson Carvas Junior, Miércio S Melo, Matheus H L Ferreira
{"title":"Which Protein-Based Dietary Supplements Most Effectively Enhance Fat-Free Mass and Strength Gains in Healthy Adults Undergoing Resistance Training? A Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Marcos D M Drummond, Ronaldo A D Silva, Nelson Carvas Junior, Miércio S Melo, Matheus H L Ferreira","doi":"10.1155/tsm2/5557511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various protein-based dietary supplements are widely used by individuals engaged in strength training to optimize gains in muscle strength and fat-free mass. However, gaps remain in the scientific literature regarding a comprehensive comparison-particularly the effectiveness of different types of supplemented proteins in healthy adults. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of protein-based dietary supplements, combined with strength training, on increasing muscle strength and fat-free mass in healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A network meta-analysis was conducted using randomized controlled trials evaluating different protein supplements combined with strength training. The outcomes assessed were muscle strength (primary) and fat-free mass (secondary). The search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to May 2024, with no restrictions on language or publication date.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78 studies were included, comprising 4755 participants across two outcomes and involving 13 types of protein supplements, plus placebo and control groups. Compared to placebo, for strength, collagen was the most effective supplement (SMD = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.73; <i>p</i> = 0.0125; SUCRA 88.05%), followed by whey protein (SMD = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.27; <i>p</i> = 0.0145; SUCRA 64.34%). The other supplements showed no statistically significant differences compared to placebo (<i>p</i> > 0.05). For fat-free mass, results were similar. Collagen showed a statistically superior effect (SMD = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.40; <i>p</i> < 0.0001; SUCRA 98.92%), followed by whey protein (SMD = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.28; <i>p</i> = 0.0051; SUCRA 60.23%). Other supplements showed no statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Collagen and whey protein are the only protein supplements effective in enhancing strength training effects. Moreover, collagen shows a superior effect compared to whey protein for both outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":"2026 ","pages":"5557511"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12862422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tsm2/5557511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Various protein-based dietary supplements are widely used by individuals engaged in strength training to optimize gains in muscle strength and fat-free mass. However, gaps remain in the scientific literature regarding a comprehensive comparison-particularly the effectiveness of different types of supplemented proteins in healthy adults. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of protein-based dietary supplements, combined with strength training, on increasing muscle strength and fat-free mass in healthy adults.

Methods: A network meta-analysis was conducted using randomized controlled trials evaluating different protein supplements combined with strength training. The outcomes assessed were muscle strength (primary) and fat-free mass (secondary). The search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to May 2024, with no restrictions on language or publication date.

Results: A total of 78 studies were included, comprising 4755 participants across two outcomes and involving 13 types of protein supplements, plus placebo and control groups. Compared to placebo, for strength, collagen was the most effective supplement (SMD = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.73; p = 0.0125; SUCRA 88.05%), followed by whey protein (SMD = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.27; p = 0.0145; SUCRA 64.34%). The other supplements showed no statistically significant differences compared to placebo (p > 0.05). For fat-free mass, results were similar. Collagen showed a statistically superior effect (SMD = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.40; p < 0.0001; SUCRA 98.92%), followed by whey protein (SMD = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.28; p = 0.0051; SUCRA 60.23%). Other supplements showed no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Collagen and whey protein are the only protein supplements effective in enhancing strength training effects. Moreover, collagen shows a superior effect compared to whey protein for both outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在接受抗阻训练的健康成人中,哪种蛋白质膳食补充剂最有效地提高无脂肪质量和力量增益?网络元分析。
背景:各种以蛋白质为基础的膳食补充剂被从事力量训练的个人广泛使用,以优化肌肉力量和无脂肪量的增加。然而,关于全面比较的科学文献仍然存在空白,特别是不同类型的补充蛋白质在健康成年人中的有效性。本系统综述和网络荟萃分析旨在比较以蛋白质为基础的膳食补充剂结合力量训练在增加健康成人肌肉力量和无脂肪量方面的有效性。方法:网络荟萃分析采用随机对照试验评估不同的蛋白质补充剂结合力量训练。评估的结果是肌肉力量(主要)和无脂肪质量(次要)。检索在PubMed, Scopus和Embase中执行,截止到2024年5月,没有语言或出版日期限制。结果:总共纳入了78项研究,包括4755名参与者,涉及两种结果,涉及13种蛋白质补充剂,以及安慰剂和对照组。与安慰剂相比,就强度而言,胶原蛋白是最有效的补充剂(SMD = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.09至0.73;p = 0.0125; SUCRA 88.05%),其次是乳清蛋白(SMD = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03至0.27;p = 0.0145; SUCRA 64.34%)。与安慰剂相比,其他补充剂没有统计学上的显著差异(p < 0.05)。对于无脂肪质量,结果相似。胶原蛋白在统计学上表现出较好的效果(SMD = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.48 ~ 1.40, p < 0.0001, SUCRA 98.92%),其次是乳清蛋白(SMD = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.05 ~ 0.28, p = 0.0051, SUCRA 60.23%)。其他补品差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:胶原蛋白和乳清蛋白是唯一能提高力量训练效果的蛋白质补充剂。此外,与乳清蛋白相比,胶原蛋白在这两种结果中都表现出更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书