Root cause analysis of airplane technical failures with Rasmussen's risk management framework (RRMF) based human-machine-environment-procedure (HMEP) taxonomy

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2026.104723
Chia-Fen Chi , Vincent Tjendra , Steven Su
{"title":"Root cause analysis of airplane technical failures with Rasmussen's risk management framework (RRMF) based human-machine-environment-procedure (HMEP) taxonomy","authors":"Chia-Fen Chi ,&nbsp;Vincent Tjendra ,&nbsp;Steven Su","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2026.104723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study developed a taxonomic approach based on 30 technical failure occurrences between 2002 and 2020. This framework extends the author's previous work on human-machine-environment-procedure (HMEP) taxonomy through the application of Rasmussen's Risk Management Framework (RRMF), which can serve as a common framework to aggregate or compare datasets collected by different organizations. This RRMF-based HMEP taxonomy was used to categorize the contributing factors of 30 technical failure occurrences into seven mutually exclusive categories and respective subcategories for statistical analysis and other risk management analysis. The RRMF provided a hierarchical structure for these first-layer categories, including government oversight, manufacturer deficiency, company management, company procedure and documentation<em>,</em> people and activity management, technical failure, and environment. The functional block diagram and failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) were applied to translate the technical failures of 12 environment control system failure cases into FMEA tabular statements. Several failure modes had been identified for environmental control system failure occurrences, e.g., sense line leakage, flawed sensor input, duct crack and leakage, broken part (pin and spring), seal degradation, contamination, tube rupture, mechanical joining defect, poor contact, and unanticipated failure instances for electronic centralized aircraft monitor (ECAM). Each failure mode can provide diagnostic information to identify and fix the environmental control system failure problem more effectively. In conclusion, this RRMF-based HMEP taxonomy provided a mental model to guide the data collection during an accident investigation and subsequently derive accident patterns as the core for Safety Management System (SMS) implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 104723"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687026000013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study developed a taxonomic approach based on 30 technical failure occurrences between 2002 and 2020. This framework extends the author's previous work on human-machine-environment-procedure (HMEP) taxonomy through the application of Rasmussen's Risk Management Framework (RRMF), which can serve as a common framework to aggregate or compare datasets collected by different organizations. This RRMF-based HMEP taxonomy was used to categorize the contributing factors of 30 technical failure occurrences into seven mutually exclusive categories and respective subcategories for statistical analysis and other risk management analysis. The RRMF provided a hierarchical structure for these first-layer categories, including government oversight, manufacturer deficiency, company management, company procedure and documentation, people and activity management, technical failure, and environment. The functional block diagram and failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) were applied to translate the technical failures of 12 environment control system failure cases into FMEA tabular statements. Several failure modes had been identified for environmental control system failure occurrences, e.g., sense line leakage, flawed sensor input, duct crack and leakage, broken part (pin and spring), seal degradation, contamination, tube rupture, mechanical joining defect, poor contact, and unanticipated failure instances for electronic centralized aircraft monitor (ECAM). Each failure mode can provide diagnostic information to identify and fix the environmental control system failure problem more effectively. In conclusion, this RRMF-based HMEP taxonomy provided a mental model to guide the data collection during an accident investigation and subsequently derive accident patterns as the core for Safety Management System (SMS) implementation.
基于Rasmussen风险管理框架(RRMF)的人机环境程序(HMEP)分类的飞机技术故障根本原因分析。
本研究基于2002年至2020年间发生的30起技术故障开发了一种分类方法。该框架通过应用Rasmussen风险管理框架(RRMF)扩展了作者之前关于人-机器-环境-程序(HMEP)分类的工作,该框架可以作为汇总或比较不同组织收集的数据集的通用框架。该基于rrmf的HMEP分类法用于将30个技术故障事件的影响因素分为7个相互排斥的类别和各自的子类别,用于统计分析和其他风险管理分析。RRMF为这些第一层类别提供了一个层次结构,包括政府监督、制造商缺陷、公司管理、公司程序和文档、人员和活动管理、技术故障和环境。应用功能方框图和失效模式与影响分析法(FMEA),将12个环境控制系统失效案例的技术故障转化为FMEA表格式报表。环境控制系统故障发生的几种失效模式已被确定,例如,感测线泄漏、传感器输入有缺陷、管道裂纹和泄漏、部件损坏(销和弹簧)、密封退化、污染、管道破裂、机械连接缺陷、接触不良以及电子集中式飞机监视器(ECAM)的意外故障实例。每种故障模式都可以提供诊断信息,从而更有效地识别和修复环境控制系统的故障问题。总之,这个基于rrmf的HMEP分类法提供了一个心理模型,用于指导事故调查期间的数据收集,并随后得出事故模式,作为安全管理系统(SMS)实施的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书