Examination of inertial measurement units to evaluate lower body segmental angles in persons with autism

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2026.113172
Lauren A. Luginsland , Kiara B. Barrett , Hunter J. Bennett
{"title":"Examination of inertial measurement units to evaluate lower body segmental angles in persons with autism","authors":"Lauren A. Luginsland ,&nbsp;Kiara B. Barrett ,&nbsp;Hunter J. Bennett","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2026.113172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Inertial measurement units (IMU’s) have been used to collect human movement data in practical, real-world environments in both non-pathological and pathological gait. IMU sensors have produced strong results for their validity and repeatability compared to the gold-standard of motion capture, specifically in college-aged populations. Due to their small size and lightweight design, IMU’s can be very convenient for the collection of movement data across various populations. Given the unique movement patterns reported in persons with autism (i.e., variability both intra- and inter-subject), the purpose of this proposed study was to compare gait events and segmental angles of the foot, shank, and thigh during gait via IMU’s compared to the “gold standard” of motion capture. Gait events were calculated using the superior-inferior acceleration/anterior-posterior acceleration (SIacc/APacc) methodology and the 10 N vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) methodology. Gait event detection was matched between SIacc/APacc and vGRF methods for heel strike yet significantly different for toe off. Our results support the existing literature suggesting an agreement in sagittal plane lower extremity segmental angles between IMU’s and motion capture, with less agreement between modalities in the frontal and transverse planes. However, these findings should be approached with caution and accompanied by recommendations that take into account the attributes of each participant (e.g. stimming, sensitivities). Future work investigating specific functional tasks to define the axis system and limit out-of-plane motion is needed in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 113172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929026000266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inertial measurement units (IMU’s) have been used to collect human movement data in practical, real-world environments in both non-pathological and pathological gait. IMU sensors have produced strong results for their validity and repeatability compared to the gold-standard of motion capture, specifically in college-aged populations. Due to their small size and lightweight design, IMU’s can be very convenient for the collection of movement data across various populations. Given the unique movement patterns reported in persons with autism (i.e., variability both intra- and inter-subject), the purpose of this proposed study was to compare gait events and segmental angles of the foot, shank, and thigh during gait via IMU’s compared to the “gold standard” of motion capture. Gait events were calculated using the superior-inferior acceleration/anterior-posterior acceleration (SIacc/APacc) methodology and the 10 N vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) methodology. Gait event detection was matched between SIacc/APacc and vGRF methods for heel strike yet significantly different for toe off. Our results support the existing literature suggesting an agreement in sagittal plane lower extremity segmental angles between IMU’s and motion capture, with less agreement between modalities in the frontal and transverse planes. However, these findings should be approached with caution and accompanied by recommendations that take into account the attributes of each participant (e.g. stimming, sensitivities). Future work investigating specific functional tasks to define the axis system and limit out-of-plane motion is needed in this population.
用惯性测量装置评估自闭症患者下体节段角。
惯性测量单元(IMU)已被用于在实际的、真实的环境中以非病理和病理步态收集人体运动数据。与运动捕捉的黄金标准相比,IMU传感器的有效性和可重复性已经产生了强有力的结果,特别是在大学年龄的人群中。由于IMU的小尺寸和轻量化设计,它可以非常方便地收集不同人群的运动数据。鉴于自闭症患者报告的独特运动模式(即受试者内部和受试者之间的可变性),本研究的目的是通过IMU比较步态过程中足、小腿和大腿的节段角度和运动捕捉的“黄金标准”。采用上下加速度/前后加速度(SIacc/APacc)方法和10 N垂直地面反作用力(vGRF)方法计算步态事件。SIacc/APacc与vGRF方法对足跟撞击的步态事件检测结果相匹配,但对脱趾的步态事件检测结果存在显著差异。我们的研究结果支持了现有文献的观点,即IMU和运动捕捉在矢状面下肢节段角度上是一致的,而在额平面和横平面上的模式不太一致。然而,这些发现应该谨慎对待,并伴随着考虑到每个参与者的属性(例如刺激,敏感性)的建议。未来的工作需要研究特定的功能任务来定义轴系统和限制面外运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书