Methylation and merriment: an exploration of epigenetic mechanisms underlying play behaviour

IF 10.9 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Biological Reviews Pub Date : 2026-07-02 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1002/brv.70142
Robert J. Malka, Marcos Arranz, Ignacio Baselga-Carretero
{"title":"Methylation and merriment: an exploration of epigenetic mechanisms underlying play behaviour","authors":"Robert J. Malka,&nbsp;Marcos Arranz,&nbsp;Ignacio Baselga-Carretero","doi":"10.1002/brv.70142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Species from octopi to humans engage in play. This review examines how epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, may regulate play behaviour across taxa. We frame play through historical definitions, categorizing it into object, locomotor, and social forms, and examine how each may be linked to epigenetic shifts, for example in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression. We then explore the role of domestication in enhancing play <i>via</i> methylation of stress and sociality genes, comparing domesticated chickens, dogs, and foxes to their wild kin. We link the neurobiology of play, spanning the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and reward circuits, to epigenetic modulation. Assessing the evolutionary fitness advantages of play, we compare adaptive benefits against the surplus resource theory. Despite its presence in many taxa, there remains limited direct evidence for a role of epigenetic mechanisms in play, and we urge research into the developmental and adaptive roles of play across a wider range of species.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"101 4","pages":"1683-1703"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brv.70142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Species from octopi to humans engage in play. This review examines how epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, may regulate play behaviour across taxa. We frame play through historical definitions, categorizing it into object, locomotor, and social forms, and examine how each may be linked to epigenetic shifts, for example in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression. We then explore the role of domestication in enhancing play via methylation of stress and sociality genes, comparing domesticated chickens, dogs, and foxes to their wild kin. We link the neurobiology of play, spanning the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and reward circuits, to epigenetic modulation. Assessing the evolutionary fitness advantages of play, we compare adaptive benefits against the surplus resource theory. Despite its presence in many taxa, there remains limited direct evidence for a role of epigenetic mechanisms in play, and we urge research into the developmental and adaptive roles of play across a wider range of species.

甲基化与快乐:探索游戏行为背后的表观遗传机制。
从章鱼到人类,所有物种都会玩耍。这篇综述探讨了表观遗传机制,如DNA甲基化,如何调节不同分类群的玩耍行为。我们通过历史定义来构建游戏,将其分为物体形式、运动形式和社会形式,并研究每种形式如何与表观遗传变化联系起来,例如脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)的表达。然后,我们通过比较家养的鸡、狗和狐狸与它们的野生亲属,探讨了驯化在通过压力和社会性基因甲基化来增强玩耍中的作用。我们将游戏的神经生物学,横跨下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴和奖励回路,与表观遗传调节联系起来。在评估游戏的进化适应度优势时,我们比较了适应效益和剩余资源理论。尽管它存在于许多分类群中,但仍然有有限的直接证据表明表观遗传机制在发挥作用中所起的作用,我们敦促研究在更广泛的物种中发挥的发育和适应作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书